2014 Ukrainian Maidan Revolt: News, Views, Photos & Videos

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
I quite agree Jeff that business should be operated in the way you describe. However the notion I describe I found at the time reported in a newspaper article.
Well, what a newspaper article reports on a particular day is not real evidence of any governmental or major economic authority recommending such illegal acts by business leadership.

delft said:
And you cannot deny that many bankers acted quite immorally when selling sub prime mortgages for AAA quality, when trading in shares or currency using millisecond advantages in computer networks and many other tricks that do not improve material production or improve services so that notion didn't really go that much farther.
I presume you are talking about the US finaincial crisis now? 1st what one considers immoral...or even unethical...is not the same as criminal behavior. The former is what people probably ought not to do, but not against the law. The latter is patently illegal and is against the law.

And, besides, that was something that happened in the US which had many, many more issues influencing it (like the fact that politicians passed laws forcing banks to sell houses at sub prime rates to bad credit risks (all in the name of buying more votes for those credit risks because they could now tell them that they, the politicians, got them their piece of the "American dream), and then the banks, knowing full well that the risk was bad, sold them to other institutions so they could get out from under what the politicans had forced them to do...and ultimately speculators did exactly what you describe and was so rampant that it almost brought the whole system down). The main reason for it was, as I say, politicans of a cerrtain ilk making laws when they had the majority, that were foolish to begin with and done in the name of pure politics. Anyhow, we could go on and on about that...but let's not. It's off topic here.

delft said:
The oligarchs in Ukraine are not controlled by law. The politicians are very corrupt, Yanukovych and his friends not more than his opponents. And I don't think EU can pay for whatever might prove to be necessary.
Some of them may well not be. And that is bad. But that is one of the reasons I am sure many of the Ukrainians hope to be able to get to the EU, because they hope that there is a much higher semblance of the rule of law thetre than what they are currently living with...or what they see as the personification of oligarchy (erightly or wrongly) in the leadership of Russia...except they see it there as official and at the national level.

My hope is simply that the parties do not over react, or act rashly and get themselves into a real war, which would make everything much worse for the people...the citizens who will be most adversly effected by it.
 

bajingan

Senior Member
Obama warns Russia of 'costs' for any military intervention in Ukraine

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


President Barack Obama bluntly warned Russia on Friday that it will face international condemnation as well as unspecified "costs" for any military intervention in neighboring Ukraine.






Related Stories


US warns Russia against Ukraine intervention Associated Press
US warns Russia on Ukraine, nudges Georgia to West Associated Press
Kerry: Russia pledges to respect Ukraine's borders Associated Press
White House warns Russia to avoid 'provocative' actions with Ukraine Reuters
Ukraine says Russia tries to seize airports, base Associated Press

"We are now deeply concerned by reports of military movements taken by the Russian Federation inside of Ukraine," Obama said in a hastily arranged public statement from the White House briefing room.

"Just days after the world came to Russia for the Olympic games, it would invite the condemnation of nations around the world. And indeed, the United States will stand with the international community in affirming that there will be costs for any military intervention in Ukraine," the president warned.

His remarks came after top Ukrainian officials charged that Russian troops had taken over the two main airports in the strategic Crimea peninsula.

RELATED: Ukrainian official says 8 Russian cargo planes in Crimea

The president did not confirm Moscow's apparent role in the deployments, but he declared that "any violation of Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity" would be "deeply destabilizing" and amount to a "profound interference" in its neighbors' affairs, as well as a violation of international laws.

"Throughout this crisis, we have been very clear about one fundamental principle: The Ukrainian people deserve the opportunity to determine their own future," he said.

"Right now, the situation remains very fluid," Obama said. "Vice President Biden just spoke with the prime minister of Ukraine to assure him that in this difficult moment, the United States supports his government's efforts and stands for the sovereignty, territorial integrity and democratic future of Ukraine."

"We will continue to coordinate closely with our European allies, we will continue to communicate directly with the Russian government, and we will continue to keep all of you in the press corps and the American people informed as events develop," he said.

Obama's remarks were the latest sign that the crisis over Ukraine, where protesters and the parliament pushed pro-Moscow President Viktor Yanukovych from power, will not end quietly or anytime soon. Top U.S. officials have reached out to their Russian counterparts in recent days, including Obama calling Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Hours before Obama's surprise statement, Secretary of State John Kerry said he had discussed the situation with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

"I asked specifically that Russia work with the United States and with our friends and allies in order to support Ukraine, to rebuild unity, security, and a healthy economy," Kerry said. Lavrov "reaffirmed President Putin’s statement that Russia will respect the territorial integrity of Ukraine," Kerry said.

It was unclear what sorts of actions Obama might take, or what limited approach would deter the Russians

There is 99.5% chance that Putin is laughing at this one
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
You know, one of the things that is great about SD is that we have some exceptional people here who are in the know and who post here and can give us information about what we are seeing and hearing long before the rest of the world (particularly the news agencies) catch on.

Case in point is the "armed men" who took over the Crimea government buildings yestewrday and then the airports in the Crimea earlier today. As pictures began to leak out and get shown here, we had members (in this case in particular Terran_Empire) who indicated that those were not only Russian uniforms...top of the line...but that because of their arms, webbing, etc, that they were Russian soldirs.

Now, we have the press reporting all over the place that the Russian military is on the ground in the Crimea. Probably initially from the Naval Base there, but now more and more through those very airports they have taken control of. One quote from the Urkaine is now that, "Thirteen Russian aircraft landed at the airport of Gvardeyskoye with 150 soldiers in each one," And this is already taking place as Obama and Kerry keep up their prattle about the Russians better not put troops on the ground or there will be "consequences." Yea, Barry, sure...sort of like the "Red Line," in Syria that you first said was drawn in the sand...and then later you said you never said. Sure.

Fact is, we know now that the Russian Mmilitary is on the ground in the Crimea.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Market Watch said:
Russian soldiers have occupied two key airports in Ukraine’s restive pro-Russia region of Crimea, Ukraine’s acting interior minister said Friday.

Soldiers wearing camouflage and bearing automatic weapons have taken up positions at Belbek Airport in Sevastopol, home of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, and at the airport in Simferopol, the region’s capital, Arsen Avakov said.

He said the soldiers’ uniforms bore no identifying marks “but they do not hide their affiliation with the Russian armed forces.”

“This is an armed invasion and occupation,” he said in a message posted on his Facebook page. “It is a direct provocation of armed bloodshed in the territory of a sovereign state.”

At Belbek Airport, Avakov said armed military units connected to Russia’s fleet had blocked access to the terminal and that the airport was now closed. He said Ukrainian soldiers and border guards remained inside the airport and Interior Ministry troops had set up a perimeter around the airport, but there had been no conflict.

In Simferopol, he said that around midnight, 100 people who identified themselves as a Cossacks — civilian Russian traditionalists who often work closely with police — tried to break through a fence onto the airport grounds, but were driven away by airport security.

Then, at 1:30 a.m., several trucks carrying more than 100 armed soldiers in unmarked camouflage uniforms arrived and took up positions inside the airport’s restaurant. When told by Ukrainian Interior Ministry troops that they had no right to be there, Avakov said the soldiers said they had been instructed not to negotiate.

He said that despite the standoff, the airport was operating normally.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Fox News said:
Russian troops moved into Crimea Friday, U.S. officials told Fox News, prompting Ukraine to accuse Russia of an "armed invasion."

At the White House, President Obama said the U.S. government is "deeply concerned" by reports of Russian "military movements" and warned any violation of Ukraine's sovereignty would be "deeply destabilizing."

"There will be costs" for any military intervention, he said, without specifying what those costs might be.

U.S. officials told Fox News they see “evidence of air and maritime movement into and out of Crimea by Russian forces” although the Pentagon declined to officially "characterize" the movement.

Agence France Press quoted a top Ukranian official as saying Russian aircraft carrying nearly 2,000 suspected troops have landed at a military air base near the regional capital of the restive Crimean peninsula.

"Thirteen Russian aircraft landed at the airport of Gvardeyskoye (near Simferopol) with 150 people in each one," Sergiy Kunitsyn, the Ukrainian president's special representative in Crimea, told the local ATR television channel, according to AFP. He accused Russia of an "armed invasion."

The new developments prompted Ukraine to accuse Russia of a "military invasion and occupation" -- a claim that brought an alarming new dimension to the crisis.

Russia kept silent on claims of military intervention, even as it maintained its hard-line stance on protecting ethnic Russians in Crimea, a peninsula of Ukraine on the northern coast of the Black Sea.

A spokesman for the Ukrainian border service said eight Russian transport planes have landed in Crimea with unknown cargo.

Serhiy Astakhov told The Associated Press that the Il-76 planes arrived unexpectedly Friday and were given permission to land, one after the other, at Gvardeiskoye air base, north of the regional capital, Simferopol.

Astakhov said the people in the planes refused to identify themselves and waved off customs officials, saying they didn't require their services.

Earlier in the day, Russian armored vehicles rumbled across Crimea and reports surfaced of troops being deployed at airports and a coast guard base – signs of a more heavy-handed approach to the crisis from Moscow

The Ukraine has to be very, very careful now. They should themselves deploy their troops to the borders of the other provinces and the nation...but in NO WAY attack or fight the Russians already in the Crimea. That is a trap. It will giv Putin the pretext he will need to send in more and more and Urkaine could lose most of its nation.

If they stand forceful...and prepared...at those other areas, making the Russians come to them, and then protest loudly to the international community in the hopes of forming a strong coaltion, then they have a much better chance in the sort run and the long run. But that will take time and they cannot afford to get immediately embroiled with a much stronger and more capable, and deeper, Russian force at this point.
 
Last edited:

Equation

Lieutenant General
If true, this would be great material for your mercenary thread! :)

If it's true and if we can find out who they are.

Mercenary or not, they conducted they carry out their military operations pretty proficient. Most of them don't even have their unit insignia's on their uniforms or any id on their BDU (battle dress uniforms) at least from what I've seen on television lately. Russian black ops perhaps?
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Guys, talk about the US sending unprepared ambassadors to China and elsewhere, outside of the Ukraine, while interesting and perhaps pathetic, is still completely off topic on this thread. Partuclarly as this situation in the Ukraine has heated up significantly today. Please...

STAY ON TOPIC

I am removing those off topic comments and moving them to the "What the Heck?" thread.


Thanks.
 
Last edited:

Broccoli

Senior Member
After Obama's "red line" in Syria it's quite clear that Putin knows he's a weak leader, and Russians knows that US liberals are defeatist pacifists who won't do anything. Russians are doing anything to get Ukrainians "bite" so they have excuse to attack... they did same in Georgia and Shakasvili was stupid enough to do it.

If Russia get's way from taking Crimea it's over for small NATO countries like Estonia because Russians know that west doesn't do anything.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Russia's do or die strategic necessity to influence Ukraine and hold Crimea, is in a completely different league to any designs they might have over Estonia.

Certainly it is alarmist and unrealistic IMHO to think Putin will go for another sovereign country simply because they managed to possibly hold onto Crimea. It is a completely different game.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
After Obama's "red line" in Syria it's quite clear that Putin knows he's a weak leader, and Russians knows that US liberals are defeatist pacifists who won't do anything. Russians are doing anything to get Ukrainians "bite" so they have excuse to attack... they did same in Georgia and Shakasvili was stupid enough to do it.

If Russia get's way from taking Crimea it's over for small NATO countries like Estonia because Russians know that west doesn't do anything.
Well, I am not so sure about that.

This will lead to a very much strengthening of NATO and the EU. Poland, Hungary, the Baltics, GErmany, etc. will all stiffen up significantly and show resolve. I expect at this point that Russia is going to control Crimea...now that they have committed troops. It will probably end up like the Provinces in Georgia. Crimea will vote for Independence and they will ask Russia to be their protectorate.

Russia will retain the Crimea and the base at Sevastapol pemanently without worry about a lease to a Ukriane alinged with the EU.

That's what is happening here.

The Ukraine is going to have to accept this now...as is the EU. Short of some type of foreign policy/negotiating miracle, I am afraid it is too late to prevent or do anything about.

The Ukraine has to immediately see to the security of their other bodres and defend them, but not attack the Russian forces.

If Obama wanted to show any type of strength at all...he would have started sending C-17 aircraft with advisors, provisions, trainers, and its own security Force to Kiev day before yestterday...or maybe now. Not as a military force to fight the Russians, but as a warning to Russia that to go any further will neccessitate rolling over American soldiers. The EU should do the same thing.
 
Last edited:

Equation

Lieutenant General
Well, I am not so sure about that.

This will lead to a very much strngethening of NATO and the EU. Poland, Hungary, the BAltics, GErmany, etc. will all stiffen and show resolve. I expect that Russia is going to control Crimea...at this point, now that they have committed troops, it will probably end up like the Prvinces in Georgia. Crimea will vote for Independence and they will ask Russia to be their protectorate.

Russia will retain the Crimea and the base at Sevastapol pemanently without worry about a lease to a Ukriane alinged with the EU.

That's what is happening here.

The Ukraine is going to have to accept this now...as is the EU. Short of some type of foreign policy/negotiating miracle, I am afraid it is too late to prevent or do anything about.

The Ukraine has to immdeiately see to the security of their other bodres and defend them, but not attack the Russian forces.


Hey Jeff have you heard anything from your Ukrainian friends regarding the former PM Yanukovich and that the new government are planning to press charges on him and demand Russia to turn him over?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top