2014 Ukrainian Maidan Revolt: News, Views, Photos & Videos

Status
Not open for further replies.

shen

Senior Member
first Georgia 2008, now Ukraine. in both instances, the servicemen of former Soviet republics just don't seem to have the stomach to fight Russia. why? Is it because nostalgia for the Soviet Union is still very much alive in the heart of the common people?
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
They have almost no budget either Ukraine is basically Bankrupt.
They have only a small amount of Fuel for there Vehicles, are using equipment that was given to them in the 1990's from stocks left over from the 1970's 1980's. I mean Seriously The Iraqi Army in the Gulf war was in better shape, and what are they facing? Civilians backed by Militias who are being armed by a nation who's military might Dwarfs them. A modernized Russian Army, In far far better shape then the Force that participated in Georgia.
 

Miragedriver

Brigadier
Thank you TerraN. That’s my point exactly. There will be a disenfranchised minority that will not want to be part of Russia. Maybe even some ethnic Russians that may want to remain as part of the Ukraine. You have to put yourself in their position. Imagine if the part of the nation you live in became part of your neighboring nation’s territory. How would you feel about it?

Imagine (granted these are exaggerations, but it provides a frame of reference):

a) Western Poland being incorporated into Germany
b) Baluchistan portion of Pakistan becoming part of Iran
c) Areas of the southwest USA with a Mexican majority becoming part of Mexico
d) Melilla between Spain and Morocco
e) Kashmir between China, Pakistan and India
f) Golan between Israel and Syria
g) Carlingford Lough between Ireland and UK
h) Gibraltar between UK and Spain
i) Arica between Chile and Peru
j) Etc………I could go on...........................
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Ukraine crisis: Military column 'seized' in Kramatorsk
Pro-Russian militants in eastern Ukraine have seized six Ukrainian armoured vehicles, the defence ministry in Kiev says.
Reports say the occupants were disarmed after the vehicles were blockaded by locals in the city of Kramatorsk.
The incident comes a day after the military began an operation to remove pro-Russian protesters from public buildings across eastern Ukraine.
Meanwhile, Nato is increasing activity in member states bordering Russia.
After Ukrainian forces recaptured an airfield outside Kramatorsk on Tuesday, armoured vehicles appeared in the centre of the town early on Wednesday.
BBC journalists witnessed civilians, at least some of whom appeared to be local people, challenging soldiers, who were also blocked by a crowd a few kilometres outside the town.
One officer said he had not "come to fight" and would never obey orders to shoot his "own people".
"A column was blocked by a crowd of local people in Kramatorsk with members of a Russian diversionary-terrorist group among them," the defence ministry said its statement.
The military vehicles were then taken to Sloviansk where they are being held by "people in uniforms who have no relation to Ukraine's armed forces," the ministry said.
The Ukrainian troops appear to have been disarmed before being fed by pro-Russian militants at a cafe in Sloviansk and then put on a bus back to their home city of Dnipropetrovsk.
In another incident, several hundred residents of Pchyolkino, south of Sloviansk, surrounded another column of 14 Ukrainian military vehicles.
After the crowd was reinforced by pro-Russian gunmen, negotiations ensued and the troops were allowed to drive their vehicles away, but only after agreeing to surrender the magazines from their assault rifles.
Ukraine's "anti-terrorist" operation is looking more and more a non-event - or worse, an outright fiasco, reports the BBC's David Stern in Donetsk.
The episodes come amid increasing tension across eastern Ukraine, blamed by the Kiev government and the West on covert Russian intervention in the region - an allegation denied by Moscow.
The crisis escalated this month after pro-Russian rebels occupied buildings in about 10 towns and cities, demanding greater autonomy or referendums on secession.
Tens of thousands of Russian soldiers are believed to have massed on Ukraine's borders since Russia took control of the Ukrainian region of Crimea last month, following a controversial referendum on self-determination.
As tensions rose, Ukraine's acting Defence Minister Mykhailo Koval headed for the east of the country to monitor the progress of the "anti-terrorist operation" announced by acting President Olexander Turchynov on Tuesday.
In the city of Donetsk, where activists have been occupying the regional government building since 6 April, pro-Russian gunmen have taken control of the mayor's office.
They told an AFP correspondent their only demand was for the region to stage a referendum on turning Ukraine into a federation with broader local rights.
'More planes'
Meanwhile Nato announced it was beefing up its eastern members' defences.
In Brussels, Nato Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen promised "more planes in the air, mores ships on the water, more readiness on the land".
He called on Russia to make clear it did not "support the violent actions of well-armed militias or pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine".
The Nato alliance includes two ex-Soviet Baltic republics with large ethnic Russian communities, Latvia and Estonia, while other members such as Poland share borders with Russia.
Four-way talks are due to take place on Thursday in Geneva between diplomats from Russia, the EU, the US and Ukraine.
Ahead of the annexation of Crimea, masked soldiers believed to be Russian troops appeared at strategic points across the peninsula alongside "self-defence" units, said to have been formed locally.
Speaking in London, UK Foreign Secretary William Hague said Russia had sent "thinly disguised" armed groups into eastern Ukraine to spearhead the occupation of buildings.
Ukraine's Security Service (SBU) has meanwhile published what it says is a batch of intercepted conversations between the Russian secret services and pro-Russian forces in eastern Ukraine.
Russian security service officers are heard to order forces in eastern Ukraine to "shoot to kill" when dealing with Ukrainian troops who do not surrender, according to the transcripts.
Counter-intelligence spokesman Vitaliy Naida told reporters the same Russian agents had been involved in the run-up to Russia's Crimea annexation.
The intercepts could not be independently verified. Moscow maintains the pro-Russian protests in eastern Ukraine are the result of grassroots activism.
I am reminded of a Story of a force of European Peacekeepers in Africa who were literally stripped of there gear arms and vehicles. They even took the Uniforms.
 

advill

Junior Member
Maybe a better phrase could be "Russia Springing into Action". Interesting to examine the history of this region and have one's own thinking about the current situation. Putin is definitely a strong leader, irrespective of views about him and his arm-twisting methods. Countries need strong leaders, albeit hopefully not brutal ones. Only with an honest, strong and uncorrupt leader with a dedicated team can any country progress. Unfortunately, there are very few around - most of them have their own agendas including promoting their legacies. We find them in several countries: Big, Medium-sized and small ones too.


Thing is will Russia try and grab Odessa which is very strategic for Ukraine

Foreign warships can visit Odessa naval base right across from Crimea I have a feeling Russia is going to go for Odessa this is why they are trying to start another engagement in Eastern Ukraine

This is called the Russian Spring
 

solarz

Brigadier
Thank you TerraN. That’s my point exactly. There will be a disenfranchised minority that will not want to be part of Russia. Maybe even some ethnic Russians that may want to remain as part of the Ukraine. You have to put yourself in their position. Imagine if the part of the nation you live in became part of your neighboring nation’s territory. How would you feel about it?

I think at this point, talks about a disenfranchised minority is just speculation. What we do know is that when the Kiev government sent in troops to quell the pro-Russian protests, those troops were met and blocked by crowds of angry unarmed civilians.

That pretty much shoots a hole in the argument that the pro-Russian protesters were composed of paid shills or undercover Russian agents. Unless you think Russia managed to insert entire villages into Ukraine.

I'm sure there are people who don't want to join the Russian Federation, but by all appearances, most of those people do not want to remain a part of Ukraine.
 

Dizasta1

Senior Member
Thank you TerraN. That’s my point exactly. There will be a disenfranchised minority that will not want to be part of Russia. Maybe even some ethnic Russians that may want to remain as part of the Ukraine. You have to put yourself in their position. Imagine if the part of the nation you live in became part of your neighboring nation’s territory. How would you feel about it?

Imagine (granted these are exaggerations, but it provides a frame of reference):

a)Western Poland being incorporated into Germany
b)Baluchistan portion of Pakistan becoming part of Iran
c)Areas of the southwest USA with a Mexican majority becoming part of Mexico
d)Melilla between Spain and Morocco
e)Kashmir between China, Pakistan and India
f)Golan between Israel and Syria
g)Carlingford Lough between Ireland and UK
h)Gibraltar between UK and Spain
i)Arica between Chile and Peru
j)Etc………I could go on...........................


I'm gonna go off-topic for some corrections to your two points there, namely B & E:

The issue in Pakistan's province of Baluchistan is not related to Iran. Rather, it is the indians, who are operating from 7 so-called diplomatic offices established in Afghanistan, post US invasion of the country. The BLA are identified as terrorists who are being covertly armed and funded via channels of pro-indian offices within Kabul. Karzai/Kabul, dislike Pakistan to the extent that they would cross any foreign-relation threshold, as helping the indians out where need be, to undermine Pakistan's stability. Iran has nothing to do with Baluchistan, to the contrary, they are facing issues with Jhandallah terrorists who've conducted several raids across the Pakistan-Iran border. The only thing Iran wants Pakistan to do is control and subdue this Jhandallah terrorist group.

Kashmir, well this subject has been well documented from the UN to OIC. The people of Kashmir were promised a plebicite, or what is called the freedom to choose whether they want to be a part of Pakistan, india or be independent. Upon the creation of Pakistan, the "Two Nation" concept was adopted on the basis of Muslims for Pakistan and hindus for hindustan. Kashmir is a Muslim majority area which was ruled by a hindu, who in-turn chose to cecede to hindustan (india). This was against the wishes of the people of Kashmir, as they weren't even given a chance to choose. The hindustani army was immediately deployed in Kashmir and then war ensued.

Pakistan took whatever land area it got when fighting a war against hindustan, for the liberation of Kashmir. Areas where China contested with Pakistan's side of Kashmir, was resolved between Pakistan and China, peacefully. And China's claim to Aksai Chin with hindustan, got dealt with war in 1962. This area, I might add, is a desolate wasteland of no economic or social value, other than a strategic one for China. Currently, what hindustan (india) holds is the Vale of Kashmir, Leh and Ladakh. Where the Vale of Kashmir is a Muslim majority area and the people of the Vale predominantly either want to cecede to Pakistan and/or become independent sovereign state.

-----------------------------------------------

Now back to the topic:

What interests me is the land area of Transnistria and the news regarding it, that came out last month!
 
Last edited:

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Well Kinda Sorta. The truth is always a moderate. Russian Intelligence has been caught feeding money and posting "Guest Roles" Actors paid to play as Pro Russians hero's or to discredit western nations. The Russians have also been caught with some embarrassing moments Where Russian Embeds have let it slip. basically they are operating like US ARMY Green Berets. they move in Identify local groups who are friendly to there ends, Equip and Train them, lead them into actions.

If they want to remain part of Ukraine? Those actively in the protests may not at least of the Ukraine as it is today. If they Want to become part of Russia is also in question. But for sure the State of Ukraine has a long way to go before it can become a real nation. The entire political system needs a Overhaul.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Getting caught or not caught is irrelevant. In my old neighborhood growing up that was the thug mentality to believe if they didn't get caught committing a crime, it meant they weren't guilty. Hawaii was acquired pretty much the same way where non-Hawaiians were shipped in to "out-vote" the indigenous population to become a state.
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Hope it was nothing too serious and that your recovery will be swift!

Yes, Master Delft, we will be praying for your complete and swift recovery, and hoping you know the One True Master, in this lovely Holy Week, as we celebrate the Easter Season!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top