09III/09IV (093/094) Nuclear Submarine Thread

[siegecrossbow]

The Indian media had reported on this B.S. a month ago from FIRST Post media. And reported by the same lady who used to work for WION News.

It is the gift that keeps on giving. Change a few details, claim the source is top secret Japanese report, and publish it a month later!

 

[ChongqingHotPot92]

Now that Indian media picking on that too.. i expect to see a repeat of how one Indian TV actually broadcasted fake news on Chinese Su-35 crash.

Given the strong bias on BROSINT... It will become circular reporting, something which Sutton himself actually despise but well, do little or no action to remedy.

Or maybe the Daily Mail is run by a bunch of Jai Hinds, just like Downing Street.

 

[broadsword]

Or maybe the Daily Mail is run by a bunch of Jai Hinds, just like Downing Street.

No, but white imperialists who hate a rising China to the core.

 

[siegecrossbow]

Or maybe the Daily Mail is run by a bunch of Jai Hinds, just like Downing Street.

No. Jai Hinds are just the imitators. They are the original and the best at what they do.

 

[Hitomi]

Given the strong bias on BROSINT... It will become circular reporting, something which Sutton himself actually despise but well, do little or no action to remedy.

Since he has doubled down on the fake news, he wants it to gain traction so that his credibility can be propped up among the midwits he has left for followers.

 

[sheogorath]

Because there are English language "OSINTers" who can't do PLA watching competently and signal boost things that do not deserve to get signal boosted, and tabloids who can't do journalism competently end up signal boosting them in turn.

I am seriously interested that you are seriously interested -- is the idea of the Daily Mail writing an article on this a month after it first made idiotic rounds on Twitter/X not completely on brand for them?

I think what kind of bothers people is that Sutton used to be reliable and was doing OSINT before it became "cool" and a obvious grift. It is completely unserious to go around stickying tweets when there is no new information and is the same old rumor as before.

 

[Rafi]

I think what kind of bothers people is that Sutton used to be reliable and was doing OSINT before it became "cool" and a obvious grift. It is completely unserious to go around stickying tweets when there is no new information and is the same old rumor as before.

They cannot resist the "8 pieces of silver" from you know who.

 

[steven_master]

Isn’t 55 crew members rather low for a nuclear submarine compliment

 

[Stealthflanker]

Isn’t 55 crew members rather low for a nuclear submarine compliment

It's low but practical. Crew as low as 30 was realized in Russian alfa class in 1960's. With high automations.

 

[no_name]

Isn’t 55 crew members rather low for a nuclear submarine compliment

Plus 100 child workers.

The article is certainly not legit, so no numbers there should be taken seriously.