manqiangrexue
Brigadier
A big problem with you is that you don't filter data; you swallow it literally when it comes from someone with position. You're stuck on the word, "fruitful" but how would he know if it was fruitful? He just knows that he got data and he's not going to complicate the matter by saying, "We got data but we don't know if it's good because it's common practice for submarines to make excessive noise to cover their true acoustics during times when they know they're being detected." That statement is true; the technique is used around the world.According to a Japanese newspaper Yomiuri Shimbun, a high ranking official of Japanese Defense Ministry said, "it was fruitful that Japan was able to get Shang-class sub's data".
This would be another example of you failing to filter data. "Chased" actually means "followed." Just like China often says that it chased American FONOPS out of the South China but it actually means that they followed the US and the American ships eventually left. This is exactly what happened here. How could it actually be a chase? What's the sub afraid of? They're not going to depth-charge it; what else can they do?no, no. JMSDF's destroyer Onami started continuous hot pursuit when 093B was inside Senkaku's contiguous zone. After continuously chased for nearly 24 hours, the sub 093B surfaced, probably forced or unwillingly, not voluntarily. the sub 093B could not run away in East China Sea.
Did the Japanese source say that the sub was forced to surface or did you add that? Because there is no mechanism in the world to force an enemy sub to surface. You can kill it with a depth charge to sink it, but if it doesn't want to surface, you can't do anything about it. If the Japanese source said this, it would be a direct example of their providing false information to sensationalize the article. If you said this, it demonstrates your lack of understanding of submarine operations.