Yak-36 combat debut was n afghanistan, according to the soviet,her performance was totally dissappointment,the soviet immediately has the aircraft retire.there's a speculation that china may obtain few sample for technical evaluation.
The performance was terrible, particularly from their vessels. Very underpowered. Very short range. US Naval aviators had a nick name for them:Yak-36 combat debut was in Afghanistan, according to the soviet,her performance was totally dissappointment,the soviet immediately has the aircraft retire.there's a speculation that china may obtain few sample for technical evaluation.
The performance was terrible, particularly from their vessels. Very underpowered. Very short range. US Naval aviators had a nick name for them:
FUGSD - "Fly up, get shot down"
I do not think the Chinese have much, if anything to learn from them. They would learn more from the Harrier, and I bet with as many of those as have been proliferated around to different countries, they could get their hands on one if they wanted.
Yes...that was the "official, above board," route that was canceled.China was offered the Harrier during the Cold War days, but got canceled after Tiananmen.
Yes...that was the "official, above board," route that was canceled.
But, I would not be surprised to find that China either has, or is, attempting to get one through less above board means since then to take a look.
There are still quite a few of them out there, and were operated by the US, the UK, Spain, Italy, India and Thailand. OIOnly the US, Spain, italy, and India operate them now. The Chinese were not likely to get one from the US, UK (who sold all of theirs to the US Marines), India, or probably Spain or Italy, but Thailand's Harriers were less secure...and they got far less use out of them. In 2006 or 2007 they discontinued use of them and I am not sure what they did with them.
Would not be surprised at all.
As you can see, the new Japanese vessel is a very large ship. Even at 30,000 tons full load, which is 3,000 tons larger than they admit to, I believe if fully outfitted with aircraft and fuel, it will actually be closer to 35,000 tons. The Chinese LHA appears to be very similar, if not larger still.
The Japanese are already building their second vessel in this class. As I said, with the parts being put together in the lower left of the earlier photo, I believe it is possible that the PLAN is currently building two Type 75 LHAs.
DDH??? What a joke. If the Japanese believe lying about their LHAs by calling them "Helicopter Destroyers" would make their neighbors less concerned about their aggressive postures, they're out of their f-ing minds.