056 class FFL/corvette

Status
Not open for further replies.

Franklin

Captain
The PLAN is getting there. They are operating more and more in the blue water. They are building a force that will continue that trend.

So in the sense that they can get their vessels into the blue water and send replensihment ships with them to keep them there for extended periods, they do indeed operate in the blue water. Not that often, and not that large of groups, but they are getting out there now on an increasing basis.

However, there is no world wide infrastructure to support them in this.

What bases does the PLAN have...their own bases...around the world?

How large a group can they send out for indefinite periods?

What influence do they bring to those areas far from their onw shores or immediate area of influnce on a maritime basis?

I am talking about the ability to exert the type of large influence that the PLAN can have right now within the 1st island chain in the China Sea. Where they are reconginzed as being able to exert that type of influence wherever they go.

I believe this is what kwaigonegin is talking about.

It will be decades before the PLAN has those type of capabilities and influence in place anywhere they go, and are recognized by the rest of world as such.

Right now, all of these things can be said about some other nations. If I had to place nations in five tiers regarding that type of capability it would be like this (an "x" indicates that country has a fixed wing aoircraft carrier capability either in existance or currently building) :

1st Tier - Premiere Capability
United States Navy (x)

2nd Tier - Strong Capability
UK Royal Navy (x)
French Navy (x)
Russian Navy (x)

3rd Tier - Good Capability
Spanish Navy (x)
Italian Navy (x)

4th Tier - Some Capability
Japan's JMSDF
Australian Royal Navy
Korean Navy
Canadian Navy
Indian Navy (x)
Chinese PLAN (x)
German Navy
Israel Navy

5th Tier - Little or no capability
Brazilian Navy (x)
New Zealand Navy
Swedish Navy
Norway Navy
Indonesian Navy
Malaysian Navy
Pakistan Navy
Iranian Navy
Thailand Navy (x)
MExican Navy
Chilian Navy
Argentine Navy
Saudi Navy
Egyptian Navy
Vietnam Navy

Note, this does not mean that one or the other of these is necessarily more powerful than the other in local areas. It just relates to what bases they have abroad, what they can send aborad and have supported for long periods, and what influence they exert while doing so when they are out there, almost anywhere in the world.

Anyhow, it is more a discussion about extent of Blue Water operations and capability than it is about the ability to get their forces there.

You place the Japanese navy and the Chinese navy behind those of Italy and Spain and lob them together with the Israeli navy?
 

andyhugfan

Banned Idiot
The PLAN is getting there. They are operating more and more in the blue water. They are building a force that will continue that trend.

So in the sense that they can get their vessels into the blue water and send replensihment ships with them to keep them there for extended periods, they do indeed operate in the blue water. Not that often, and not that large of groups, but they are getting out there now on an increasing basis.

However, there is no world wide infrastructure to support them in this.

What bases does the PLAN have...their own bases...around the world?

How large a group can they send out for indefinite periods?

What influence do they bring to those areas far from their onw shores or immediate area of influnce on a maritime basis?

I am talking about the ability to exert the type of large influence that the PLAN can have right now within the 1st island chain in the China Sea. Where they are reconginzed as being able to exert that type of influence wherever they go.

I believe this is what kwaigonegin is talking about.

It will be decades before the PLAN has those type of capabilities and influence in place anywhere they go, and are recognized by the rest of world as such.

Right now, all of these things can be said about some other nations. If I had to place nations in five tiers regarding that type of capability it would be like this (an "x" indicates that country has a fixed wing aoircraft carrier capability either in existance or currently building) :

1st Tier - Premiere Capability
United States Navy (x)

2nd Tier - Strong Capability
UK Royal Navy (x)
French Navy (x)
Russian Navy (x)

3rd Tier - Good Capability
Spanish Navy (x)
Italian Navy (x)

4th Tier - Some Capability
Japan's JMSDF
Australian Royal Navy
Korean Navy
Canadian Navy
Indian Navy (x)
Chinese PLAN (x)
German Navy
Israel Navy

5th Tier - Little or no capability
Brazilian Navy (x)
New Zealand Navy
Swedish Navy
Norway Navy
Indonesian Navy
Malaysian Navy
Pakistan Navy
Iranian Navy
Thailand Navy (x)
MExican Navy
Chilian Navy
Argentine Navy
Saudi Navy
Egyptian Navy
Vietnam Navy

Note, this does not mean that one or the other of these is necessarily more powerful than the other in local areas. It just relates to what bases they have abroad, what they can send aborad and have supported for long periods, and what influence they exert while doing so when they are out there, almost anywhere in the world.

Anyhow, it is more a discussion about extent of Blue Water operations and capability than it is about the ability to get their forces there.

500px-HA_HA_HA,_OH_WOW.jpg

C'mon Jeff, I thought you were better than that....;)
 

Attachments

  • 500px-HA_HA_HA,_OH_WOW.jpg
    500px-HA_HA_HA,_OH_WOW.jpg
    36.2 KB · Views: 4

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
Thanks, I think I am getting it, clearly seeing two funnels on the 4 July pictures. It is a bit embarrassing that my strained eyes needed the help of aurora borealis to see this.

So exit the launch of LN 3 in June. But we actually get a good grip on Liaonan construction: LN 3 and 4 must have been laid down after the launches of LN 1 and 2 in August and November 2012, respectively. The pattern seems to be that Lushun launches follow those at Wuhan with a delay of less than a month. That means that LN 3 should be launched in August and LN 4 in November. Two a year, in other words.

Plus 4 from HD and HP means 12 launches a year roughly speaking, in 3 years they build 36 of these or more

I believe this means maybe three corvette, two FFG and one DDG flotilla per fleet, being very ambitious I would say at a push maybe even three FFG and two DDG flotilla per fleet

That's 24 warships per fleet or further down the line 32 warships per fleet, but I think they will stop at 24 and move onto the big ticket items, cruisers, LHD and carriers
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
C'mon Jeff, I thought you were better than that....;)

You place the Japanese navy and the Chinese navy behind those of Italy and Spain and lob them together with the Israeli navy?
Come on guys, read the context of the analysis and discussion. It is not an analysis of whose vessels and numbers of vessels are stronger than another.

This particular analysis, as I said, has nothing to do with individual vessel or group strength, it has to do with global reach, foreign basing, long distance influence, logistics, etc.

The ranking would be wholly different if it were looking at what the strongest task force of one navy could do when pitted against the strongest task force of another.
 

timepass

Brigadier
Plus 4 from HD and HP means 12 launches a year roughly speaking, in 3 years they build 36 of these or more

I believe this means maybe three corvette, two FFG and one DDG flotilla per fleet, being very ambitious I would say at a push maybe even three FFG and two DDG flotilla per fleet

That's 24 warships per fleet or further down the line 32 warships per fleet, but I think they will stop at 24 and move onto the big ticket items, cruisers, LHD and carriers



Referring to Jeff's recent updated list of 056 till now 14 have been launched (4HP/4HD/3LN/3WC) its 14 approx in a year, so in next 3 years keeping the momentum, we are anticipating 42 more builds total 56.

OTOH, if keeping same pace for FFGs (3 launch per year) they will have around 10 more 054As or Bs in addition to 2+20 approx 32FFGs next 3 years.

Hence, IMO following flotilla will comprise the 3 fleets:

4 OPVs - 056 (rest 2 flotilla will go HKG garrison)
3 FFGs - 054 (A/B)
2 DDGs - 051B/C, Souv, 052/B/C/D

36 ships per fleet in next 3-5 years.....
 
Last edited:

SampanViking

The Capitalist
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
500px-HA_HA_HA,_OH_WOW.jpg

C'mon Jeff, I thought you were better than that....;)

That's a little unfair as I do understand the point Jeff is making.
I think it opens to some potentially fascinating areas of discussion with regards to the likely speed the PLAN can build a global support structure for its extended long range operations and where these facilities will most likely be.
The problem I have is that it is really not a proper part of the 056 thread and so should not continue here.
I am not sure if there is a thread already regarding Future Chinese bases or if so, how old it is.
I would not object to a new thread on the subject being started or using some of the posts here to start it.
 

franco-russe

Senior Member
Ok...take a look now:

592 should be Hull 13, as LN 3 has not yet launched.

And of course the complete range of pennant numbers for the first 20 will be 580-599.

I guess that the second series of 10 will get the pt.nos. of the first plus 8. I.e. WC 1 was 584, WC 3 was 592.
If true, LN 3 would be 588 (LN 1 being 580), etc. Hong Kong is a special case, as there we will have 596-597 and 598-599).
 

franco-russe

Senior Member
I find it difficult to recognise the existing structure of the PLAN surface forces in the speculations in posts # 1733 and 1735. I do not anticipate there will be any radical changes in that structure

The fleet is organised in flotillas (zhidui支队) and squadrons (dadui大队).

A destroyer flotilla normally has four destroyers and four frigates. The latter were organised into squadrons until late 2011 when they were disbanded and the frigates subordinated directly to the flotilla.

The surface forces are divided into three tiers:

Tier 1: six destroyer flotillas, two per fleet, which will eventually each form the escort of a carrier. I believe each will eventually get two 055A.

Tier 2: presently four frigate squadrons, two each in ESF and SSF. I think there will soon be a fifth squadron in NSF, and possibly a sixth later. These are equipped with older frigates (053 versions), which will no doubt eventually be replaced by 054A’s as these are replaced by new frigates.

Tier 3: presently 11 subchaser squadrons, four in NSF, four in ESF and three in SSF, of which eight are presently getting one 056 each. Depending on whethere 36 or (more likely) 40 Type 056 are built, eight or nine will eventually become light frigate squadrons. In addition, Hong Kong will also have four 056.
 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
Franco-Russe

Tier 1, And SSF there is room for 172 and 173 (Type 052D) to join 170 and 171 (Type 052C)

This leaves 167,168 and 169 which means they need to still add one more DDG to build full two flotillas of 4 DDG each

ESF is easy 136-139 ( Sovs) and 150-153 (Type 052C)

NSF is easy too, 112, 113, 115 and 116 and then comes 117-120 (Type 052D)

This means there's 11 "second rate" DDG and 13 "first rate" DDG

Out of the 13 first rate DDG there's 6 x Type 052C which means there needs to be 7 x Type 052D, agreed?

If they do add a single Type 052D to complete 167-169 at SSF it would have to be 166? Or will they number it 174?

I bet they wish they built two Type 051B for sake of numbers

Out of the 7 Type 052D there's already been 3 launched which means there's just 4 left, would it not just be easier for JN to launch all 4 and switch to Type 055, but I just can't believe the Type 052D will stop with 7 units, maybe a 3rd DDG is on the agenda integrated with two Type 055? Because I always thought there is going to be 8 x Type 052D or more

So each fleet has three DDG flotillas
One with 2 x Type 052D and 2 x Type 055
Second with 4 Type 052C/D
Third with 4 older Type 052, 052A, 051B, 051C and Sovs
 

A.Man

Major
My friend, it is not likely to have 174 in Chinese Navy. 174 sounded like "一起死" in Chinese. 一起死in Chinese is "We All Die Together!"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top