The US is considering something called the LSC or Large Surface Combatant.
Ironically, the interest for a US Large Surface Combatant was spurred by --- the Type 055.
This is like the beginnings of a circular arms and power race. Go back in time and note naval ship developments from the 1900 to 1940, as ships keep growing larger and more powerful as they counter one another. This seems it might be happening again.
I don't see the LSC as being spurred on by the introduction of a few Type-55.
I see it as primarily being from:
1. replacing the Ticonderoga cruisers and their air-defence command role.
2. the overall growth of the high-end Chinese destroyer fleet, and it is the Type-52D which has been built in much larger numbers.
---
From 1900-1940s, ships kept getting larger because ship size translated directly into combat power eg.
1. Guns were the primary offensive armament. Larger guns which meant more range and the ability to strike first.
2. More armour also meant more survivability
But we now live in an age of missiles as the primary offensive and defensive armament - which is largely independent of ship size.
The targeting of those missiles is now dependent on the sensor suite available.
But once you reach Zumwalt/Type-55 levels, you gain very little benefit from adding additional sensors or electrical power onto a bigger hull.
So I don't see a spiral of larger ships being introduced
This could easily be nothing more exciting than future-proofing the design, such as for a time when railguns and/or lasers will be needed. The excess power does not have to be explained by a super-powerful main 346B AESA.There are two other indicators that the 055's Type 346B radar is is extremely powerful. One is that the ship has six generators on board the ship. Even assuming the ship has power requirements for the X-band AESA and those huge ECM panels the ship has, that seems to be a lot of electrical power for a ship that isn't integrated electric propulsion.
It is not proven the that thicker units are the IFF. Actually I think the thinner units are the IFF (they are about the size seen on 052C/D, etc.), and the thicker units are some other kind of new emitter that we haven't seen before.The second indicator is that the IFF units on the 055 are way bigger and thicker than the IFF units on the 052D. The capabilities of the IFF units needs to match the radars they are serving. If the radar can detect and track these number of units at these ranges, the IFF should be able to reach out and interrogate the same. These IFF units are what you see on top of the bridge vertically from each of the four panels of the radars. I have never seen anything like this on any warship in terms of size, and another thing to mention they are quite thick. The large and thick IFF units on the 055 may indicate they house powerful transmitters that require some kind of forced cooling either liquid or forced air cooling. These units must be able to interrogate a huge number of targets through a huge reach and volume of space, much more than the IFF on the 052D can. The IFF technology on the series have progressively moved from IFF strip within the array in the 052C, to external IFF units on the 052D which allows it to become bigger and allow access to passive air cooling. Now it has led to this.
This could easily be nothing more exciting than future-proofing the design, such as for a time when railguns and/or lasers will be needed. The excess power does not have to be explained by a super-powerful main 346B AESA.
It is not proven the that thicker units are the IFF. Actually I think the thinner units are the IFF (they are about the size seen on 052C/D, etc.), and the thicker units are some other kind of new emitter that we haven't seen before.
Define "excessive", especially when you are supposed to be thinking ahead to high power requirement technology like DEW and railguns.That is quite a bit of excessive future proofing.
This is all pure speculation, of course. There are clearly two different flat rectangular hardware sets on top of the 055. Both of them provide a complete 360 coverage around the ship since they are both made of 4 'bars' set at 90 degree angles around the top of the bridge. Their exact position is completely irrelevant going just by common sense sniff test, so I'm not sure why you are making a mountain out this particular molehill. Just because the 052D's IFF units are situated over the 346A panels doesn't mean they also have to be situated over the 346B panels on the 055. In fact their identical sizes (to my eyes) suggest to me that they are one and the same IFF units, and that they have actually been rotated 90 degrees relative to their position on the 052D. I think the larger flat rectangular structures serve some other purpose that we do not yet know. Perhaps a dedicated surface search radar. Perhaps something else.The IFF units on the 052D is located right on top of the Type 346A above the bridge windows. This is the same position as these large emitters are on the Type 055. IFF units on the 052C are likely to be strips inside the panel situated on top of the array, which is the way these units are also arranged on the MPQ-53 of the Patriot systems and the HT-233 on the land based HQ-9. This gives the IFF units the same field of view as the scanning radar and allows them to interrogate anything within this FOV.
The IFF units on the 052D are also physically thinner in thickness than the smaller units on the 055, which in my opinion is more similar to the SR2410C search radars used in export vessels. The export search radar is essentially a budget single faced version rotating version while the 055's quartet is a much more expensive fixed four face version covering front, back, left and right.
How big, do you reckon, is Uksk-m?but a small increase in depth so it will be close to UKSK-M might be in order to allow for ballistic hypersonics
How big, do you reckon, is Uksk-m?
This could easily be nothing more exciting than future-proofing the design, such as for a time when railguns and/or lasers will be needed. The excess power does not have to be explained by a super-powerful main 346B AESA.
This could easily be nothing more exciting than future-proofing the design, such as for a time when railguns and/or lasers will be needed. The excess power does not have to be explained by a super-powerful main 346B AESA.
It is not proven the that thicker units are the IFF. Actually I think the thinner units are the IFF (they are about the size seen on 052C/D, etc.), and the thicker units are some other kind of new emitter that we haven't seen before.