PLAN may thus have more confidence in their 130mm gun's anti-missile capability as part of layer defence than some of our members here. Is that right?
At 40 rounds per minute, that's double the rate of a Mk.45, and the H/PJ-38 has PGM munitions the AK-130 doesn't have, so yes, there should be plenty of AA potential there and certainly the intention for such.
I do wonder in my mind what controls it though, lacking the Type 344 FCRs you see on the 052C/D. Does the Type 346B arrays control the guns, or does it pass it to another radar? If its the small four paneled radar on top of the mast, which would have to be an X-band if it has gunnery functions, from its high point the radar would have an expanded radio horizon, which means it can engage a threat before the CIWS can. If this X-band AESA handles the FCR for the main gun, it can spot, track and engage the threat before the CIWS can and at a range greater than it. I have not taken the labor of measuring the height of this radar vs. the height of the Type 344, but my impression is that this new radar has a higher height than the 344 as it sits on the 052C/D, which itself sits pretty high to clear the Type 366 Bandstand radar's dome.
Refer to Page 700, post #6993 by by78, that confirms the panels on the top mast are radars, having a circular-hexagonal array shaped, and which were newly installed.