055 DDG Large Destroyer Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

latenlazy

Brigadier
Fully manufactured in China.

FYI, QC-280 is the chinese manufactured version of the Ukrainian DN80 gas turbine. So you can tell by the name that it is Chinese.




Having done a google earth estimation of the dimensions itself, I would say he is in the right ballpark.

21+ m is probably more like 23m, however there's nothing wrong with being conservative, after all we only have the foundations to go off. Once google earth updates the area we'll have a more accurate structure to measure.

The length for this ship is impossible to discern at this point, and 175m could be possible, but may lie in the lower range of estimates.

You guys know that's tphuang right (unless I'm mistaken)?
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
You guys know that's tphuang right (unless I'm mistaken)?

Of course.

(and you're not mistaken lol)

--

He doesn't post on SDF as often as he used to, I would've expected some posts in this thread by now. Probably too much speculation for his taste (although some of his earlier blog posts had its fair share! :D)
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Some more nice art, via hongjian, cdf

0XjxrmB.jpg


YXAwOSb.jpg


IUm1YRi.jpg



Good looking, but I'd prefer if the VLS were both arranged transverse to the ship axis, and also if the rear VLS deck was higher and flush with rest of the ship.
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
Of course.

(and you're not mistaken lol)

--

He doesn't post on SDF as often as he used to, I would've expected some posts in this thread by now. Probably too much speculation for his taste (although some of his earlier blog posts had its fair share! :D)

I can relate to the feeling. The more I know the less I feel there is to say (in terms of new things at least).
 
Last edited:

Solaris

Banned Idiot
Is the QC-280 fully manufactured in china or are some parts still produced in ukraine?
Also, what do you think about the estimatives of the dimensions of type 055 (based in a land struture) presented in the latest entry in this blog:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
What this guy said:

Fully manufactured in China.


21+ m is probably more like 23m, however there's nothing wrong with being conservative, after all we only have the foundations to go off. Once google earth updates the area we'll have a more accurate structure to measure.

The length for this ship is impossible to discern at this point, and 175m could be possible, but may lie in the lower range of estimates.


Good looking, but I'd prefer if the VLS were both arranged transverse to the ship axis, and also if the rear VLS deck was higher and flush with rest of the ship.
A lower VLS section represents significant topside weight savings though.

I wonder what's that faceted bubble mast. Probably just a new lower RCS enclosure for the Type 364 radar, which would be disappointing. What would be exciting would be a new Sampson-like rotating AESA, which would obviate the need for a Type 364 as well as the 4-panel main AESA.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
A lower VLS section represents significant topside weight savings though.

But provides greater internal volume. Depends on what they want.

I wonder what's that faceted bubble mast. Probably just a new lower RCS enclosure for the Type 364 radar, which would be disappointing. What would be exciting would be a new Sampson-like rotating AESA, which would obviate the need for a Type 364 as well as the 4-panel main AESA.

It's a mast that is slightly north of the carrier mock up on the same range. It's thought to be an integrated mast for the new generation frigate, but it might also be scalable for the 055.

But I doubt it will hold a rotating AESA or an S band AESA at that (probably has an X band AESA instead)

http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/nav...tion-destroyer-thread-35-6480.html#post277087
 
I think the appearance of this "055" mock up lends credence to my theory that China will only build 6x 052Ds over in the 052 thread. Even though the length of the mock up is difficult to ascertain, estimates do bracket the length of the 052D. The 052D is one generation behind the world's latest destroyer designs while this mock up aspires to be one of them with the integrated mast and such. Also, if as someone else posted, the lead time from mock up to launch is around 3 years then why would China load up on more already somewhat outdated 052Ds when this up-to-date design will shortly be available.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
I think the appearance of this "055" mock up lends credence to my theory that China will only build 6x 052Ds over in the 052 thread. Even though the length of the mock up is difficult to ascertain, estimates do bracket the length of the 052D. The 052D is one generation behind the world's latest destroyer designs while this mock up aspires to be one of them with the integrated mast and such. Also, if as someone else posted, the lead time from mock up to launch is around 3 years then why would China load up on more already somewhat outdated 052Ds when this up-to-date design will shortly be available.


Sigh.

First of all, 052D is not "one generation behind" the world's largest destroyer designs. Generations are typically defined by the technology of the ship,not the size. In that sense, 052D is in some ways half a generation ahead than the ships you are talking about like burke, atago, sejong or ticos, given it uses a next generation APAR and a more modern and more flexible VLS.

As to why the PLAN will build more than 6 052Ds — retirement and fleet planning. The PLAN will continue retiring some of its older destroyers like 051 and they will need ships to replace them without too much delay. More importantly, if they do cease 052D production at 6, they will be drastically cutting down their short to medium term capability because putting it plainly and simply: they are losing out on six damned good destroyers, which may not meet their ship number requirement.

You do not continue or cease to build ships solely on how advanced they are, you build them because of the capabilities you need which is dependent on both the qualitative capability of the ship and the quantitative number of the ships you have. So saying that the PLAN can build 6 052Ds because they have 055s coming up based on how technologically advanced they are is not a logical argument
 

no_name

Colonel
Some more nice art, via hongjian, cdf

0XjxrmB.jpg


YXAwOSb.jpg


IUm1YRi.jpg



Good looking, but I'd prefer if the VLS were both arranged transverse to the ship axis, and also if the rear VLS deck was higher and flush with rest of the ship.

It'll probably look kind of strange from the front but I am not complaining if it turns out to look something like this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top