No that's the name of the military representative being quoted.... etc., the link is
New Chinese naval destroyer outfitted in Shanghai
implying the official name of the first Type 055 to be Zhou Xin, right?
what does "Zhou Xin" mean please?
No that's the name of the military representative being quoted.... etc., the link is
New Chinese naval destroyer outfitted in Shanghai
implying the official name of the first Type 055 to be Zhou Xin, right?
what does "Zhou Xin" mean please?
oopsNo that's the name of the military representative being quoted.
and so did seawaves.com:Workers are installing conduits and cables in the 10,000-tonne vessel, Zhou Xin, a military representative stationed in the shipyard to oversee the building of the warship, was quoted by the People's Liberation Army Daily as saying.
I'm currently getting a L:B for the 055 of 182m x 21.1m when compared to a nearby 052D, assuming the length of a 052D is exactly 157m. On a side note, it looks like if the length of a 052D is 157m, then the beam is definitely wider than the oft-quoted 17m. It is more like 18.5m.
OK let's use three significant digits LOLI'm currently getting a L:B for the 055 of 182m x 21.1m when compared to a nearby 052D, assuming the length of a 052D is exactly 157m. On a side note, it looks like if the length of a 052D is 157m, then the beam is definitely wider than the oft-quoted 17m. It is more like 18.5m.
Jul 16, 2017Just as a comparison, the Daring has a L:B ratio of 7.2:1, the Zumwalt is 7.3:1, the Horizon is 7.5:1, the Burke is 7.7:1, the Atago is 7.9:1, the 052D is 9.2:1, and the Tico is 10.3:1. So either 8:1 or 9:1 for the 055 is not going to raise any eyebrows, though clearly the trend is a lower L:B ratio with many of the more recent ships.
my point (which I didn't say) has been with L/B of 9:1 the Type 055 would be a typical Cruiser, as in
186.4/20.8 = 8.9615 of the Slavas
oops
LOL I misinterpreted the sentence
and so did seawaves.com:
Zhou Xin, First Type 055 DDG, Fitting Out
Really ? As far as I can tell, the picture in the news clearly shots 6 x 8 vls in the middle and 8x8 in the front, which makes 112.lol .. the picture in the news showing 128 UVLS
Really ? As far as I can tell, the picture in the news clearly shots 6 x 8 vls in the middle and 8x8 in the front, which makes 112.
I know 112 UVLS .... but the diagram shows 8 x 16 UVLS ..... visit the link and see the diagram also the comment clearly says 128 VLS