No problem ... by the way and I know we all have our issues but could you please take a look at the last post I made in the conversations and please reply?
To admit ... I don't know ...
Deino
Deino, do you mean this question?
Deino said:
...may I ask why some always want bigger, larger, wider, more and so on !?? Maybe the current displacement is fine?
The same with this stupid discussion on 112 vs 128 VL-cells on the 055. For some it's indeed a matter of look or tragedy...
Do we play quartet game / Happy Family / Four some where indeed more is better?
Deino
That's the last one I saw on this thread, and it was quite some time ago.
The difference between 112 and 128 VLS is not huge, but I believe it was because everyone expected the new Type 055 to at least equal the number of VLS cells as the Ticonderoga AEGIS vessel, especially since it is as big, if not bigger, and 20+ years newer.
In the end, the real issue is how effective the missiles are, what types of missiles can all be handled, and how effective the sensor suite is.
While there is a huge difference between 48 or 64 and 128, there is not nearly as muh so between 112 and 128.
Anyhow...I did not know if that was the question you were referring to or not.