I posted that picture months ago, might have been nearly a year now.
My point is that something as large as the DDG 1000 can have the same powerplant as an Independence class LCS. Therefore, engines are a very rough indicator of displacement.
Say wut now?
it seems to me the writer (dvan0) meant that while the LCS Independence is propelled by 2*12205 hp diesels (details in ) plus 2*29500 hp gas turbines
(details in )
which is 83,410 hp for about 3000 tons of displacement, the Zumwalt displacing about 15000 tons gets 104,000 hp
(details in )
... but of course the propulsion types are different (CODAG x IEP), the maximum speed requirements are different etc.
I've just had a question coming up on my mind. Don't remember reading about this recently in all the ship threats.
Is there anything interesting ongoing in chinese naval gun ammunition right now? Any kind of extended range stuff like base bleed or even RAP?
Or maybe some kind of smart guidance / fuzing?
And, finally, do chinese naval guns have a secondary AA role as well?
All the info as I read it seem to indicate the 055 using the same 130mm DP gun as the Type 052D.
ok that makes more sense however it's not comparing apples to apples. One uses blades the other waterjets. Huge difference in power load generation.
I do however see where he is coming from now. In general that is correct because a ships power 'not counting external power load' has more to do with the ship's hull resistance than the size.
Once a ship is free sailing power requirements are not as crucial to move it.
But that's just one of 100 other variables to consider ship's propulsion. There is the engine shaft power, number of blades, blade revolution needed and a billion other things all comes into play..,. and of course like I said above huge difference between waterjets and screws.
but different example(s) could've been given like:Therefore, engines are a very rough indicator of displacement.