lcloo
Captain
107 and 108? i.e. the 7th and 8th ships, last two ships of first batch?
107 and 108? i.e. the 7th and 8th ships, last two ships of first batch?
What would you rather see every 4 years:.........
Maybe when 055 production restarts it will be in batches of 2, every 6 months or so.
What would you rather see every 4 years:
A) 16 Type 055 destroyers and 1 Type 003 carrier
B) 8 Type 055 destroyers and 2 Type 003 carriers
What I read was there will be a minimum of 1 large destroyer per CBG, not 4.What would you rather see every 4 years:
A) 16 Type 055 destroyers and 1 Type 003 carrier
B) 8 Type 055 destroyers and 2 Type 003 carriers
No nation has an infinite budget. Money spent on one weapons platform is money that could of been spent on something else. So there is always an opportunity cost. What is a better strategy:I don't understand. Are there any inherent tradeoffs between the two plans (assuming both are viable on their own) that you lay out above, in terms of priority, capacity or budget? Please elaborate.
perhaps 2 large destroyers for some situationsWhat I read was there will be a minimum of 1 large destroyer per CBG, not 4.
No nation has an infinite budget. Money spent on one weapons platform is money that could of been spent on something else. So there is always an opportunity cost. What is a better strategy:
Yes I see the phrase "a minimum of" but in wartime if they go with only one large 055 AAW destroyer per CVBG (with the rest of the AAW effort contributed to by a few 052Ds), I'm afraid the CV's odds to become a coral reef will increase greatly.What I read was there will be a minimum of 1 large destroyer per CBG, not 4.