What a beautiful vessel to behold…
What a beautiful vessel to behold…
How do you know they didn't? There's potentially room for another VLS amidships, TBC if it's actually there or not.This ship is ok but they should have switched it to use the same VLS system as in the destroyers.
I find this unlikely. The PLA rarely does anything "for show". If anything, people wish they did more things for show instead of strict secrecy. If it is out, it is ready, WS-15, KJ-600, J-20, WS-20, etc.Maybe the one on 003 Fujian was just for show before anything was installed? I mean the current 1130 with pause doppler x-band is already effective at engaging multiple supersonic anti-ship missiles, so long as the incoming projectiles were under Mach 4.
Really though. I kinda find it funny how Western observers and journos predict some launch on some anniversary yet it never happens. "China doing things to show off or to look like something" is a well rooted totalitarianism trope though. We will keep hearing such predictions.I find this unlikely. The PLA rarely does anything "for show". If anything, people wish they did more things for show instead of strict secrecy. If it is out, it is ready, WS-15, KJ-600, J-20, WS-20, etc.
IMO that depends on the ship's mission. If the HQ-16F has a range of over 150 km, the small VLS is enough. Anti-ship capability can be added by box-launched YJ-12s. Remember, every capability comes at an opportunity cost.This ship is ok but they should have switched it to use the same VLS system as in the destroyers.
Should frigate use destroyer vls? Do they have the sensor to make full use of range of the missiles?This ship is ok but they should have switched it to use the same VLS system as in the destroyers.
That should be a cutout for the 2nd anchor.