Pretty sure it was the mk1 version since the tech transfers occurred prior to 1989, I believe. But I’m pretty sure if it is not that difficult to increase the rate of fire using domestic technologies. The AK-176 has a rate of fire of 120 rpm, literally making it a machine cannon and effective AA gun against subsonic targets (even Harpoons and Tomahawks, as long as the proximity fuses are accurate enough). Not sure if advances in material science and metallurgy could allow the same rate of fire for the French 100mm, allowing it to have dual-purpose roles. Another issue is muzzle velocity. The AK-176 can reach 970 m/s, and such high muzzle velocity is vital for effective targeting of subsonic flying targets. The French 100mm only has a muzzle velocity of 850-870 m/s, which is similar to those of WWII era AA gun in terms of muzzle velocity. Thus, higher chamber pressure (material sciences), faster burning propellents, higher rate of fire (100-150 rpm), and even longer ranges (20+ km) would all be ideal to make the new 100mm far superior to the Ak-176, original French 100mm, and the Otto Malera 76mm.
