Yes we've known that JN will be building 8 052Ds and DL 4 052Ds ... each, at least.
Those pictures don't show D7 I think, but possibly D8?
I'll be curious if JN builds a D9 given the current projection is only 8 052Ds for JN before moving onto 055. But if they do continue with 052D while also building 055 (which we should see evidence of soon I think), that would have some implications for the future force structure.
By Wendell Minnick 9:19 p.m. EST January 8, 2015
"The 052C/Ds have a long way to go in terms of matching the US Navy's Arleigh Burke-class," Chang said. "Please check the signal cables' arrangements to the mast and the navigation light allocations on the stern. It is pathetic to spend so much money to build a major combatant with such a low level of industrial discipline."
What is he talking about? I thought the arrangements are fine.
I saw this article a few months ago and while it is decently intentioned it's a bit of a mess. Their projection of 8 052Ds is way off, and obviously that last part about signal cables and stern navigation lights is ridiculous and confusing. Actually it's just very confusing, there's two or three layers of confusion in that paragraph it's almost embarrassing to pick apart.
So yeah, this isn't really an article I would post in support of any position, apart from maybe that some PLA watchers really need to step up their game.
Noticed how the 052D in the back is actually marked with a number, so it is likely to be 172. The one in the front could be 173 Changsha, but it probably won't be officially commissioned for another two months.Latest google earth update of Yulin naval base at feb this year. 2 054As, 1 052C, 2 052Ds
Would make a nice solid core of a CSG escort detachment
Also note the similar size of the 054As compared to 052C/Ds. That may make active radar or even long range EO/visual ID and confirmation of the ships difficult for an opfor, which is no small mistake given the sheer difference in capability between the FFGs and DDGs.
054A's bow also looks like it has the bow area for a 32 cell common VLS.
Noticed how the 052D in the back is actually marked with a number, so it is likely to be 172. The one in the front could be 173 Changsha, but it probably won't be officially commissioned for another two months.
I had not seen either of these. Is there a link or can you provide a pic?A 9th DDG has been spotted at JNCX and 2nd DDG at Dalian
In a space of a very short few years the Type 052D programme has reached double digits
2015 another very strong year for chinese naval shipyards