That placard also looks like it belongs on toys from the 80’s
View attachment 101456
I dislike the name Whale Shark, which is a filter feeding fish. Maybe something like Megalodon is better. But then again that’s an extinct fish…
Humans are fish!Bad choice of name. Obviously the marketing team do not understand whale shark's behaviour.
Why not just call it as it is, type 052E, "E" for export.
Whale sharks are slow and fall prey to several creatures. They don’t even attack back since they are filter-feeders. The whale shark is often prey to a variety of fish that includes sharks, blue marlins, killer whales, and humans.
If we estimate with 159x17x6 (Lwl,B,T) and Cb 0.45-0.5, then something with 80-92k shp should atleast be able to hit 32.5-35 ±2 kn. I would expect closer to 50-60k shp for something that only reaches 28kn.Sorry, can we discuss the likely max speed of the 052D? I am aware that the most common open source estimate is 30kn and US sources frequently cite this as well. Then again, the stats stated for the export version state max 28kn; however all stats given seem to be all over the place. Such as length in between the batch 2 and 3 estimates and the stated tonnage lower than all estimates etc.
Based on what I could piece together from searching the forum, the 2x UGT25000 (?) gas turbines appear to be similar to the LM2500+ (based on a Chinese paper posted in the propulsion thread), so approximately ~30MW of power with slightly lower efficiency of around ~36%.
With ~7650 tonnes gross for the lengthened ships and a rather narrowly shaped, streamlined hull, around 30kn should be possible or not?
The French Aquitaine class is 6000 tons displacement and has 32 MW (CODLOG) propulsion power at high speed. Its top speed is 27.5 knots.Sorry, can we discuss the likely max speed of the 052D? I am aware that the most common open source estimate is 30kn and US sources frequently cite this as well. Then again, the stats stated for the export version state max 28kn; however all stats given seem to be all over the place. Such as length in between the batch 2 and 3 estimates and the stated tonnage lower than all estimates etc.
Based on what I could piece together from searching the forum, the 2x UGT25000 (?) gas turbines appear to be similar to the LM2500+ (based on a Chinese paper posted in the propulsion thread), so approximately ~30MW of power with slightly lower efficiency of around ~36%.
With ~7650 tonnes gross for the lengthened ships and a rather narrowly shaped, streamlined hull, around 30kn should be possible or not?