052C/052D Class Destroyers

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
Re: PLAN Type 052 Class Destroyer

Interesting that in 2011 we had

1 x Type 052C DDG launched in 2010
2 x Type 052C DDG launched 2011
1 x Type 052C and 2 x Type 052D launched in 2012 so that's 3 x DDG in 2012 alone
1 x Type 052D in 2014
And they could in theory get 2 x Type 052D launched in 2014

That's on average 1.8 DDG per year in the last 5 years

If the left hall was pumping the number would be 2.8 DDG per year
 
Last edited:
Re: PLAN Type 052 Class Destroyer

Err, no it is pretty well rumoured that we will see 8 052Ds with another 4 very likely to be ordered for 12 052Ds total.


Why do you suggest 6? It is a completely arbitrary number.

Yeah... I should avoid late night posting... :)
 

adeptitus

Captain
VIP Professional
Re: PLAN Type 052 Class Destroyer

Another stupid question. How easy is it to convert 052C to 052D? Can they convert those 052Cs that are still undergoing outfitting to 052D? Is it more cost-effective and more efficient to convert those 052C's to 052D's, in addition to building more 052D's from scratch?

My $0.02 is that, it's possible to upgrade the 052C with newer technologies found on 052D and later ships. But a direct conversion is probably out of the question (Jeff has already listed the reasons).

As an AAW DDG, the most important part of the ship is the sensor package and VLS system (plus missiles contained within). There is no reason why you cannot replace the 052C's VLS system with a newer one, but the Chinese Navy has so far been unwilling to commit to such expensive upgrade. Their preference is to build new ships.

There are also several examples of retrofitting VLS systems into ships that did not previous have VLS cells. Examples include Spruance-class destroyers, Adelaide-class frigates, Rajput class destroyers, Delhi-class destroyers, etc. Consider, between installing new VLS system into a ship that already has (older) VLS system, versus one that does not, the first case is likely to cost less.



It is a mystery to me as to why the PLAN would choose to continue 052C production concurrent with the improved 052D production.

I think this topic has already been discussed in the past. Without speculating on the reason, I'd point to past example where the last 2 Jiangwei II class frigates were launched in 2004 AFTER the newer 054 Frigate was launched in 2003. The shipyards delivered exactly what the Chinese Navy ordered.
 
Last edited:

by78

General
Re: PLAN Type 052 Class Destroyer

A good view of the VLS.

13434092515_6e893665f7_o.jpg
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Re: PLAN Type 052 Class Destroyer

Looks like D4 launch is imminent

qn7IenC.jpg
 

steve_rolfe

Junior Member
Re: PLAN Type 052 Class Destroyer

Yep............D4 launching appears imminent!
Doesn't seem that long ago D4 was in modules outside.
The Chinese have obviously stepped up a gear with the build times of their Destroyer programme................and in relation to this, and with other Chinese naval shipbilding programmes.............i have a general question.

Does anyone know if at the Chinese shipyards, the naval vessels are worked on 5, 6 or 7 days a week, and also are they worked on during the night?..............as i have seen pictures of Chinese vessels in naval construction halls with the lighting on...........but then again this just could be for security measures!

Thanks
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
Re: PLAN Type 052 Class Destroyer

Yep............D4 launching appears imminent!
Doesn't seem that long ago D4 was in modules outside.
The Chinese have obviously stepped up a gear with the build times of their Destroyer programme................and in relation to this, and with other Chinese naval shipbilding programmes.............i have a general question.

Does anyone know if at the Chinese shipyards, the naval vessels are worked on 5, 6 or 7 days a week, and also are they worked on during the night?..............as i have seen pictures of Chinese vessels in naval construction halls with the lighting on...........but then again this just could be for security measures!

Thanks

I am sure they work 7 days a week and 24 hours a day in 3 shift ... it shouldn't be any problem for China ... they are very very hard working people
 

kroko

Senior Member
Re: PLAN Type 052 Class Destroyer

I am sure they work 7 days a week and 24 hours a day in 3 shift ... it shouldn't be any problem for China ... they are very very hard working people

I dont think that anyone would be much productive or happy with this kind of weekly schedule. People need to rest, you know. Particulary in a job that requires qualified personnel and precision.
 
Top