052/052B Class Destroyers

snake65

Junior Member
VIP Professional
Re: DDG 052C Thread

The debris are not from a lid but a plastic membrane sealing the missile in the container and making it hermetic
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: DDG 052C Thread

well, the guy that posts most of the pictures from Shanghai has started a thread saying that there are current 3 (yeah, 3) followups to 052C under construction at JiangNan shipyard and we will start seeing those later this year (as you know, it's harder to see that shipyard now that it has relocated). Apparently, it's 9000 tonne in displacement (which means they will announce it to be 7500 tonne) and there is a 64 cell VLS.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Re: DDG 052C Thread

well, the guy that posts most of the pictures from Shanghai has started a thread saying that there are current 3 (yeah, 3) followups to 052C under construction at JiangNan shipyard and we will start seeing those later this year (as you know, it's harder to see that shipyard now that it has relocated). Apparently, it's 9000 tonne in displacement (which means they will announce it to be 7500 tonne) and there is a 64 cell VLS.
Are these followups all of the same class? And does this "guy" mention any modifications to the VLS from the 052C (i.e.: common VLS like Mk 41)? Any indications on SAM's, or Land Attack Cruise Missiles?

Thanks.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: DDG 052C Thread

HH-9 getting launched from the VLS cells of 052C. This was shown on CCTV.
 

Attachments

  • HH-9-Launch-Apr13-2.jpg
    HH-9-Launch-Apr13-2.jpg
    69.4 KB · Views: 88
  • HH-9-Launch-Apr13.jpg
    HH-9-Launch-Apr13.jpg
    68.5 KB · Views: 84
  • HH-9-Launch-Apr13-3.jpg
    HH-9-Launch-Apr13-3.jpg
    16 KB · Views: 73

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: DDG 052C Thread

well, the guy that posts most of the pictures from Shanghai has started a thread saying that there are current 3 (yeah, 3) followups to 052C under construction at JiangNan shipyard and we will start seeing those later this year (as you know, it's harder to see that shipyard now that it has relocated). Apparently, it's 9000 tonne in displacement (which means they will announce it to be 7500 tonne) and there is a 64 cell VLS.
It will be interesting and exciting to see pics of that once they reach a point where they can be seen and identified.

Three at once? 9000 ton displacement? That is a significant undertaking in and of itself.
 

Delbert

Junior Member
Re: DDG 052C Thread

It will be interesting and exciting to see pics of that once they reach a point where they can be seen and identified.

Three at once? 9000 ton displacement? That is a significant undertaking in and of itself.

Wow three ships at the same time. I just wonder when I will see 12 ships built at the same time with 9,000 tonne displacement?
 

Schumacher

Senior Member
Re: DDG 052C Thread

Well, if they're ready with the R&D part, it makes good sense to start massive construction now. Material, labour costs & shipyard spaces will be very favourable compared to the boom years.
Not to mention it helps with the stimulus programs they're pushing thru.
 

twodollarss

Banned Idiot
Re: DDG 052C Thread

Is all the best Chinese navy hardware can be found on a 052C? How does 052C compared to U.S destroyers such as Arleigh Burke destroyer? I want to get at least some sense of it..
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: DDG 052C Thread

Is all the best Chinese navy hardware can be found on a 052C? How does 052C compared to U.S destroyers such as Arleigh Burke destroyer? I want to get at least some sense of it..
You can compare them at the following site:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Just click on the "AEGIS Ships" and "AEGIS-Like Ships" buttons, and on the "Analysis" button.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Re: DDG 052C Thread

I'm wondering why the 3 destroyers would need 64 VLS...
Either their multifunctional VLS, or different VLS OR 64 SAM's. The latter of which I think is unlikely.

If the VLS's are multifunctional, I am kind of dissapointed it's only 64. I was hoping weapons loads would rival the Arleigh Burke class... But beggers can't be choosers I suppose.
 
Top