Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
no different than what some lower level American officials have said regarding China, equating individual Chinese states to Ukraine, a country.
Arab league is like UN of Arabs. not particularly effective but it is some thing they use to engage West by over emphasizing its importance to deflect attention from real things. in recent meeting only thing agreed was Arab leadership role in Syria.
There must be some mistranslation or missing context going on? Ex-Soviet Union countries would also include Russia
I don't think he would mean Russia. What I noted instead is that the way he said this, it would also include Central Asia.
If he specifically said about the Eastern Europe ex-Soviet Union states (esp. Lithuania) I would 100% cheer on him lol
Latvia FM complaining now. Wants explanation and complete retraction of statement by China
He ain't lying tho those baltic nations are just US vassals not sovereign at all
I think you missed my other reply to you #69,273 which has answered all your questions.
See the office and windows analog in #69,273,
Most of profit of mobile network comes from base station sells. In traditional network 4G and 5G, these are made by the vendors, HW and SW. US makes no profit except supplying components. In a future cloud RAN, 3/4 SW stack and more than half of HW stack of base station is moved to cloud infrastructure, together with their profit. In a market where Chinese vendors are banned, US company will take a huge chunk of profit from Ericsson, Nokia and Samsung, that is the drive for US to push for cloud RAN.
Historical example, before internet and streaming, Sony makes profit from selling CD player, Apple has no business in music. Since the time of MP3 player, Sony is pushed out, while Apple win. The platform changing moves the profit.
Those three pages mean that they (Ericsson, Nokia and Samsung) have their Office suite. But they don't have their Windows platform. US companies have. For the cloud RAN to work, the operator has to have both. In a cloud RAN, the telecom vendors are providing SW applications to be run on a virtual machine (linux) in a cloud data center.
See the office and windows analog in #69,273,
No, it is not about where the data center is located, it is about who produce them therefor making profit out of them.
Most of profit of mobile network comes from base station sells. In traditional network 4G and 5G, these are made by the vendors, HW and SW. US makes no profit except supplying components. In a future cloud RAN, 3/4 SW stack and more than half of HW stack of base station is moved to cloud infrastructure, together with their profit. In a market where Chinese vendors are banned, US company will take a huge chunk of profit from Ericsson, Nokia and Samsung, that is the drive for US to push for cloud RAN.
Historical example, before internet and streaming, Sony makes profit from selling CD player, Apple has no business in music. Since the time of MP3 player, Sony is pushed out, while Apple win. The platform changing moves the profit.
He is sitting in France so i presume he has some idea of Arab world. it Arab world wealth and ideology that made thing happen in prior cold war. i even think this Sudan crises created potentially with some wealthy arab countries support. Arabs are perfectly capable of self destruction there own properties like those Airplanes in Sudan to achieve larger objective. . even flying to Latin America need Arab airspace. that 5 day visit of Lavrov to Latin America went through Arab airspace. MBS put a phone call which is not normal for this day
who will have thought this can happen when everything agreed regarding France. or that cartoon of Macron find through Arab media.
So what does that mean for Huawei? Can they still maintain their marginal edge/global leadership moving forward? How much will Huawei's future growth in this area require diplomatic support from the CPC to encourage allies and partners (outside of the US vassalsphere) to use Huawei instead of Ericsson/Samsung/Nokia/Cisco? Likewise on the data center/SW stack side. It's good that Huawei is heavily in this space, but can they grow their market share outside of China? If Samsung/Ericsson/Nokia are going to lose a serious chunk of their profits to AWS and other US companies, is this a good thing on balance for Huawei? Neutral? Disadvantageous? Wouldn't Ericsson/Samsung/Nokia losing their profits help Huawei in the sense that its direct competitors have less to spend on R&D in this area? I guess at this point it's almost like I'm asking you to read the tea leaves on the future of Huawei, Chinese 6G, etc. vis a vis their competitors in the West+vassalsphere.