Too late for them to cut off the Anglo poison. At the same time, China has enough users to sustain a fully domestic internet ecosystem, Vietnam does not and never will.
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
FED ruined global economy by its reckless printing and 0% interest rates followed by 180 degree turn to historic interest rate hikes and QT.
Sometimes I think all of this was a deliberate attempt to create a crisis in emerging markets to kill Chinese export growth.
SK President is not only a traitor but also an idiot. Such appeasement is not only humiliated but an insult and arguing that such appeasement would strengthen trade relationship with Japan is just off the mark. Claiming that bringing Japan and SK together would stabilize relationship with China is a hint that they want to gang up against China.
Yup and why? Mostly because hardship due to war and plundering waged by western imperialism on China.
NO wonder required for a myth. You have no correlation between working hours and fertility rate. South Korea's fertility rate fell most sharply during the last administration that reduced working hours the most radically.
broadsword
Brigadier
Adding more working hours will help.
Sure, working long hours and don't have days off should help fertility.
Reducing working hours without reducing the stress and pressure won't help that much on fertility. Most of South Koreans I knew of have informed me when they were young they go to school for much longer hours than other countries and tutoring would add a few more hours. Entering top South Korean universities would pretty much define one's future. Getting into those one of chaebols is a must. South Korea has an ultra-compeitive environment that most people are stressed out and many want to leave.
I don't know about their opinions on their country's foreign policy but I genuinely wonder how South Korean young men who made him win feel about him being about to make them work for 80.5 hours per week.
"traitor", "idiot", "humiliated", "insult" all emotional name-calling and nothing substantial.
You don't have any mark to back up your claim. And you want appeasement to China while saying appeasement to Japan would strengthen trade relationship with Japan is just off the mark?