Miscellaneous News

B

Biscuits

Colonel
Registered Member
China doesn't demand much ideological adherence from NK for a reason. They have a liege and warlord relationship. NK can run things however they like as long as they maintain a large army to defend the country.

KPA is going to be more professional by far than any conscript army while having the bulk of numbers needed to fulfil the role of one while the central government's own troops act as the breakthrough spear, eyes and ears.
 
A

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
Biscuits said:
China doesn't demand much ideological adherence from NK for a reason. They have a liege and warlord relationship. NK can run things however they like as long as they maintain a large army to defend the country.

KPA is going to be more professional by far than any conscript army while having the bulk of numbers needed to fulfil the role of one while the central government's own troops act as the breakthrough spear, eyes and ears.
Click to expand...
Bro China help its allies and leave, the Collective West exact a heavy price for any aid means subjugation.
 
Chevalier

Chevalier

Major
Registered Member
Not sure if this was posted before but the below tweet in conjunction with the rumour mill of the atlanticist internet appears to make the case for a projected Anglo NATO led war against China, instigated by its proxy in Taiwan, within the next 3 years.
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612644809948397568

In 3 years several things could happen from the Atlanticist's perspective:
-The complete and utter death of the Petrodollar, hence why the Atlanticists are pushing for a world war to 'reset the map'.
- Years of indoctrination against Chinese people to prep the american and anglosphere for the 'all of civilisation' war that Kiron Skinner referenced.
-The anticipated consolidation of the EU under Atlanticist leadership with a weakened and neutralised if not outright co-opted and regime changed Russia.

All of this to culminate in a massive world war to consolidate Anglo-American hegemony of the world order because the way the world ecoomy is headed, the trajectory is looking more multipolar and less Anglo American hegemony. There's a reason Chinese Strategists consider the 2020s to be a potentially tumultuous decade.
 
E

Eventine

Senior Member
Registered Member
Then China better speed up its nuclear modernization. The West maintaining nuclear superiority over China in a time like this is not acceptable. Build a few thousand weapons and their delivery mechanisms, and then see what happens to Western resolve.
 
A

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
Chevalier said:
Not sure if this was posted before but the below tweet in conjunction with the rumour mill of the atlanticist internet appears to make the case for a projected Anglo NATO led war against China, instigated by its proxy in Taiwan, within the next 3 years.
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612644809948397568

In 3 years several things could happen from the Atlanticist's perspective:
-The complete and utter death of the Petrodollar, hence why the Atlanticists are pushing for a world war to 'reset the map'.
- Years of indoctrination against Chinese people to prep the american and anglosphere for the 'all of civilisation' war that Kiron Skinner referenced.
-The anticipated consolidation of the EU under Atlanticist leadership with a weakened and neutralised if not outright co-opted and regime changed Russia.

All of this to culminate in a massive world war to consolidate Anglo-American hegemony of the world order because the way the world ecoomy is headed, the trajectory is looking more multipolar and less Anglo American hegemony. There's a reason Chinese Strategists consider the 2020s to be a potentially tumultuous decade.
Click to expand...
Bro in 3 years so 2025/2026, hopefully NATO is still around...lol My prediction by that time China is 70 to 80% of US military a wild claim BUT I factor in attrition and depreciation of US assets. With America commitment to Europe, they can't bear their full might against the Chinese, with Iran joining the Russo-Sino bloc they have to put their already overstretched military to a breaking point. You see the US is already hard press to deal with a near peer opponent today, what more in 3 years time as China will continue to grow economically while the Collective West stagnated. All of this are all projection, The Russian and Iranians know it and the Chinese are preparing for it. That is why I support an Arm Race with Collective West, defense thru strength, the only language the American can understand. :cool:
 
J

jwnz

Junior Member
Registered Member
Chevalier said:
Not sure if this was posted before but the below tweet in conjunction with the rumour mill of the atlanticist internet appears to make the case for a projected Anglo NATO led war against China, instigated by its proxy in Taiwan, within the next 3 years.
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612644809948397568

In 3 years several things could happen from the Atlanticist's perspective:
-The complete and utter death of the Petrodollar, hence why the Atlanticists are pushing for a world war to 'reset the map'.
- Years of indoctrination against Chinese people to prep the american and anglosphere for the 'all of civilisation' war that Kiron Skinner referenced.
-The anticipated consolidation of the EU under Atlanticist leadership with a weakened and neutralised if not outright co-opted and regime changed Russia.

All of this to culminate in a massive world war to consolidate Anglo-American hegemony of the world order because the way the world ecoomy is headed, the trajectory is looking more multipolar and less Anglo American hegemony. There's a reason Chinese Strategists consider the 2020s to be a potentially tumultuous decade.
Click to expand...
IMHO, all these are just sabre-rattling, the West knows it's already too late to contain China economically and kinetically. It's the MIC in the West doing the last bidding to stay relevant and grab the last pot of gold so to speak. Granted, China shouldn't ease off at all just in case, but the elites in the West are not brave enough to (or smart enough to not) sacrifice for a lost course.
 
A

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
jwnz said:
IMHO, all these are just sabre-rattling, the West knows it's already too late to contain China economically and kinetically. It's the MIC in the West doing the last bidding to stay relevant and grab the last pot of gold so to speak. Granted, China shouldn't ease off at all just in case, but the elites in the West are not brave enough to sacrifice for a lost course.
Click to expand...
The neocon want a war now while they still have the advantage BUT the Russian had just given the Chinese a lot of breathing room, so we have to be thankful, with time given with a lot of actual projection on the Chinese side happening as we speak (like the Bohai Huludao facility) the 3 year timeframe is too optimistic for the US. They can't keep up supplying Ukraine with ammunition what more an actual kinetic war with China.
 
horse

horse

Brigadier
Registered Member
jwnz said:
IMHO, all these are just sabre-rattling, the West knows it's already too late to contain China economically and kinetically. It's the MIC in the West doing the last bidding to stay relevant and grab the last pot of gold so to speak. Granted, China shouldn't ease off at all just in case, but the elites in the West are not brave enough to (or smart enough to not) sacrifice for a lost course.
Click to expand...

Yeah, agree. It's all empty talk.

They cannot even handle the Russians in an indirect war.

China is waiting to see how this Russia Ukraine war turns out.

They probably expect the Russians to win, and then see what the reaction will be like in the West.

The American tendency is to always double down. The Europeans are far more cautious.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top