Miscellaneous News

[Stryker]

Its hard to disagree with such sentiments, and most ridiculous part of it all is that America almost certainly blundered across the point of no return without realising or even meaning to do so.

The current generation of American leaders grew up in the age of American ascendancy and unchallengeable dominance. Thus to them, American dominance is the natural order of things and a fundamental cornerstone of their entire world view. But in reality, it was merely a fleeting anomaly created by unique and unrepeatable circumstances, which is being rapidly self-corrected as the hard unflinching economic, geographic and demographic realities start to reassert themselves.

American leaders only knows a world where America can fuck over whoever they want as hard as they want and not have to worry about consequences and repercussions because of American military and economic might. Any pushback will be defensive in nature, localised and only threaten the forward deployed US forces. Essentially the US has gotten used to beating up opponents who can’t fight back and can at most only make defensive blocks, so it now thinks the worst thing that can happen from starting a fight is getting bruised knuckles from punching the other guy.

Blowback that actually hits Americans at home can only come from terrorist and similar non-state actors because states cannot run and hide from American bombs and have too much to loose to dare to really fight back, so much so they coined a new term just for that.

That’s the fundamental unspoken assumption underpinning all of America’s actions against China, that China cannot and will not not punch all. It’s a tough nut to crack, and might bruise American knuckles but will never punch back so the pain from a conflict with China can stop as soon as America decides to stop punching China.

America has zero own historical experience to draw upon to deal with an opponent like China, and is far too proud to look to learn from the history of others. So it keeps throwing little jabs and sucker punches while China blocks all the blows and patiently waits for America to exhaust itself and overreach, all the whole readying it’s own counter attacks designed not just to end the fight, but also potentially end the opponent.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Japan defence: China threat prompts plan to double military spending​

Despite shifting public opinion there is still considerable opposition to increasing military spending in Japan

Japan has announced it will double its military spending in the next five years, citing regional threats posed by China and North Korea.

It will also acquire the ability to strike enemy bases.

The changes mark the most dramatic overhaul to Japan's security strategy since it adopted a pacifist constitution after World War Two.
Under the plan, Tokyo will buy US long-range missiles capable of destroying enemy launch sites if it is attacked.

It will also increase its cyber warfare capabilities. Earlier this week, Beijing urged Tokyo to view their relationship as a cooperative partnership.

Prime Minister Fumio Kishida told journalists Japan's defence budget would be 2% of GDP by 2027.

"Unfortunately in the vicinity of our country, there are countries carrying out activities such as enhancement of nuclear capability, a rapid military build-up and unilateral attempt to change the status quo by force," he said.

"These are also now becoming more outstanding. In the next five years, in order to fundamentally reinforce our defence capabilities we will implement a defence build-up programme worth 43 trillion yen ($314bn; £257bn)."

A national security strategy document approved by the cabinet and quoted by AFP news agency described China as "the greatest strategic challenge ever to securing the peace and stability of Japan".

It also noted that China had not ruled out the use of force to assert control over Taiwan.

China's embassy in Japan responded by accusing Tokyo of making false claims about its military activities.

There are also concerns in Japan about North Korea's missile capability.

Pyongyang has fired more than 50 missiles over the past three months, including a ballistic missile over Japan in October - the first time for five years.

Meanwhile the Japanese document described the Russian invasion of Ukraine as a "serious violation of laws that forbid the use of force" which had "shaken the foundations of the international order".

A previous national security document in 2013 described China and Russia as strategic partners.

Japan's post-war constitution does not officially recognize the military and limits it to self-defence capabilities, though former prime minister Shinzo Abe expanded its role in 2015.

Polls suggest public opinion in Japan now broadly supports some form of further military expansion.

Mr Kishida's 2% of GDP figure coincides with a long-term target set by Japan's allies in the Western Nato military alliance in 2006.

While many Nato countries are still short of the target, Germany hopes to reach it in the next few years. The UK has surpassed it and is aiming to spend 3% of GDP on defence by 2030.

War is almost inevitable at this point. I believe the US will deploy Hypersonic cruise missiles & HGVs in Okinawa too. China should be under no illusion now, go all in wrt nuke buildup, HCM, HGV stockpiles and even space based weapons regardless of the consequences. When the time is right do away publicly with the no first use policy (perhaps after reaching a nuke stockpile of around 1500) and also announce Pre-emptive use of Nuclear weapons if China's core interests are threatened. Of course all this will attract numerous sanctions against China but then it will be a double edged sword in that China can finally openly massively arm North Korea to the teeth with 21st century military technology alongwith providing some advanced capabilities to Iran and Cuba to needle the US. Possibly even arm Pakistan with HGVs and HCMs in the future to keep 82IQs busy and seething. If they want a war, China should give them their fucking war!

 

[ACuriousPLAFan]

A small treat from Patch and Blizto's livestream this morning/yesterday night - Hu Xijin got another slap by Patch, Blitzo, and especially this viewer lol

 

[baykalov]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Japan defence: China threat prompts plan to double military spending

There is one little problem:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1602604257852669954

(Bloomberg) -- Japan needs to find another ¥6 trillion ($43.6 billion) to fund a promised expansion in defense spending over the five years starting in April, according to documents seen by Bloomberg.

Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has pledged ¥43 trillion in defense outlays over the period to fiscal 2027, seeking to bolster Japan’s capabilities amid growing threats from North Korea, China and Russia. That’s an unprecedented hike compared with an initial plan for ¥25.9 trillion in military spending.

About ¥11.1 trillion of the extra requirements will come from non-tax revenues. This includes the government’s foreign exchange funds account and its share in a large commercial building in central Tokyo, as well as spending cuts and surpluses. That leaves a shortfall of about ¥6 trillion, the documents show.

Japan’s Rising Defense Budget Is Now Nearly on Par With Russia

Kishida said at the weekend he wouldn’t rely on bond issuance to cover defense costs in the longer term, but would increase taxes in stages starting in fiscal 2024. He has faced opposition from two cabinet members, who have urged caution about raising taxes as the government pushes for wage rises and a virtuous economic cycle.

The government is also considering bond issuance to cover part of the increase in outlays, national broadcaster TBS reported earlier.

 

[BMUFL]

A small treat from Patch and Blizto's livestream this morning/yesterday night - Hu Xijin got another slap by Patch, Blitzo, and especially this viewer lol

View attachment 103486

Honestly, maybe Hu Xijin is secretly part of Strategic Deception Agency, because western media kept quoting him as if he represents the government. Why? Because "he works for a state media, and Chinese Regime controls all media inside China, therefore he must be representing the Chinese Regime", when in fact GT is more like Fox news...

 

[Staedler]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Japan defence: China threat prompts plan to double military spending​

Despite shifting public opinion there is still considerable opposition to increasing military spending in Japan

Japan has announced it will double its military spending in the next five years, citing regional threats posed by China and North Korea.

It will also acquire the ability to strike enemy bases.

The changes mark the most dramatic overhaul to Japan's security strategy since it adopted a pacifist constitution after World War Two.
Under the plan, Tokyo will buy US long-range missiles capable of destroying enemy launch sites if it is attacked.

It will also increase its cyber warfare capabilities. Earlier this week, Beijing urged Tokyo to view their relationship as a cooperative partnership.

Prime Minister Fumio Kishida told journalists Japan's defence budget would be 2% of GDP by 2027.

"Unfortunately in the vicinity of our country, there are countries carrying out activities such as enhancement of nuclear capability, a rapid military build-up and unilateral attempt to change the status quo by force," he said.

"These are also now becoming more outstanding. In the next five years, in order to fundamentally reinforce our defence capabilities we will implement a defence build-up programme worth 43 trillion yen ($314bn; £257bn)."

A national security strategy document approved by the cabinet and quoted by AFP news agency described China as "the greatest strategic challenge ever to securing the peace and stability of Japan".

It also noted that China had not ruled out the use of force to assert control over Taiwan.

China's embassy in Japan responded by accusing Tokyo of making false claims about its military activities.

There are also concerns in Japan about North Korea's missile capability.

Pyongyang has fired more than 50 missiles over the past three months, including a ballistic missile over Japan in October - the first time for five years.

Meanwhile the Japanese document described the Russian invasion of Ukraine as a "serious violation of laws that forbid the use of force" which had "shaken the foundations of the international order".

A previous national security document in 2013 described China and Russia as strategic partners.

Japan's post-war constitution does not officially recognize the military and limits it to self-defence capabilities, though former prime minister Shinzo Abe expanded its role in 2015.

Polls suggest public opinion in Japan now broadly supports some form of further military expansion.

Mr Kishida's 2% of GDP figure coincides with a long-term target set by Japan's allies in the Western Nato military alliance in 2006.

While many Nato countries are still short of the target, Germany hopes to reach it in the next few years. The UK has surpassed it and is aiming to spend 3% of GDP on defence by 2030.

Japan's just going to have serious problems supporting further military spending. Their economy's not in good shape and hasn't been for decades. If you listen to street interviews with the average person there about living costs, etc. it's not good. Certainly if you mention China a lot of people have their mind virus activate and they can't babble anything other than China bad, but if you talk about tangible issues you get the real sense the people are struggling and in deep trouble.

Like the Euros talking about raising their military budgets and destroying Russia. They're full of bluster but even participating in just sanctions against a relatively minor economy like Russia has British folk prostituting themselves to pay bills and cooking dog food over radiators. Then we also hear all the troubles countries like Germany are having with trying to raise their military budget.

Unless the Japanese intend to one-button press into war with China, I don't see how Japan's going to sustain any sort of real ramp up in conflict with China. The costs would eat them alive.

 

[NiuBiDaRen]

A small treat from Patch and Blizto's livestream this morning/yesterday night - Hu Xijin got another slap by Patch, Blitzo, and especially this viewer lol

View attachment 103486

Wow it sounded like a group of twenty year olds

@siegecrossbow when you say you sound nothing like your appearance, do you sound like Barry White?

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

War is almost inevitable at this point. I believe the US will deploy Hypersonic cruise missiles & HGVs in Okinawa too. China should be under no illusion now, go all in wrt nuke buildup, HCM, HGV stockpiles and even space based weapons regardless of the consequences. When the time is right do away publicly with the no first use policy (perhaps after reaching a nuke stockpile of around 1500) and also announce Pre-emptive use of Nuclear weapons if China's core interests are threatened. Of course all this will attract numerous sanctions against China but then it will be a double edged sword in that China can finally openly massively arm North Korea to the teeth with 21st century military technology alongwith providing some advanced capabilities to Iran and Cuba to needle the US. Possibly even arm Pakistan with HGVs and HCMs in the future to keep 82IQs busy and seething. If they want a war, China should give them their fucking war!

No first use is actually useful, because it allows for conventional IRBM use with lower risk of escalation. The prerequisite is launch on warning capability along with guaranteed second strike capability.

The more I think about it, the more I realize no first use is very smart, as long as it is combined with early warning, a large arsenal for when use is needed, and a good IRBM program to take advantage of no first use.

 

[clockwork]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

#boycottamerica more disgusting ACCP sweatshops violating human rights and Hispanic forced labour genocide. Smh!

 

[clockwork]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Japan defence: China threat prompts plan to double military spending​

Despite shifting public opinion there is still considerable opposition to increasing military spending in Japan

Japan has announced it will double its military spending in the next five years, citing regional threats posed by China and North Korea.

It will also acquire the ability to strike enemy bases.

The changes mark the most dramatic overhaul to Japan's security strategy since it adopted a pacifist constitution after World War Two.
Under the plan, Tokyo will buy US long-range missiles capable of destroying enemy launch sites if it is attacked.

It will also increase its cyber warfare capabilities. Earlier this week, Beijing urged Tokyo to view their relationship as a cooperative partnership.

Prime Minister Fumio Kishida told journalists Japan's defence budget would be 2% of GDP by 2027.

"Unfortunately in the vicinity of our country, there are countries carrying out activities such as enhancement of nuclear capability, a rapid military build-up and unilateral attempt to change the status quo by force," he said.

"These are also now becoming more outstanding. In the next five years, in order to fundamentally reinforce our defence capabilities we will implement a defence build-up programme worth 43 trillion yen ($314bn; £257bn)."

A national security strategy document approved by the cabinet and quoted by AFP news agency described China as "the greatest strategic challenge ever to securing the peace and stability of Japan".

It also noted that China had not ruled out the use of force to assert control over Taiwan.

China's embassy in Japan responded by accusing Tokyo of making false claims about its military activities.

There are also concerns in Japan about North Korea's missile capability.

Pyongyang has fired more than 50 missiles over the past three months, including a ballistic missile over Japan in October - the first time for five years.

Meanwhile the Japanese document described the Russian invasion of Ukraine as a "serious violation of laws that forbid the use of force" which had "shaken the foundations of the international order".

A previous national security document in 2013 described China and Russia as strategic partners.

Japan's post-war constitution does not officially recognize the military and limits it to self-defence capabilities, though former prime minister Shinzo Abe expanded its role in 2015.

Polls suggest public opinion in Japan now broadly supports some form of further military expansion.

Mr Kishida's 2% of GDP figure coincides with a long-term target set by Japan's allies in the Western Nato military alliance in 2006.

While many Nato countries are still short of the target, Germany hopes to reach it in the next few years. The UK has surpassed it and is aiming to spend 3% of GDP on defence by 2030.

Breaking: small asian country addicted to suns after trying 2 hits in 1945, desperate for more.

 

[Biscuits]

War is almost inevitable at this point. I believe the US will deploy Hypersonic cruise missiles & HGVs in Okinawa too. China should be under no illusion now, go all in wrt nuke buildup, HCM, HGV stockpiles and even space based weapons regardless of the consequences. When the time is right do away publicly with the no first use policy (perhaps after reaching a nuke stockpile of around 1500) and also announce Pre-emptive use of Nuclear weapons if China's core interests are threatened. Of course all this will attract numerous sanctions against China but then it will be a double edged sword in that China can finally openly massively arm North Korea to the teeth with 21st century military technology alongwith providing some advanced capabilities to Iran and Cuba to needle the US. Possibly even arm Pakistan with HGVs and HCMs in the future to keep 82IQs busy and seething. If they want a war, China should give them their fucking war!

China should never consider preemptive nuclear use unless her enemies acquired conventional superiority that cannot be surpassed even using the whole economy and industry as base.

Even if it was going to do a first strike because the situation presented itself, it should arguably also not end no first use policy. They're the only country so far with ability to use HGV from orbit, using that they can first strike faster than anyone else. What will the survivors do? Take the CPC to court because they violated their own stated nuclear doctrine?

If it is necessary to glass a whole country of nazis to prevent their global victory, just do it on the low down, no point in bragging beforehand that we will send nukes.

As Japan boosts spending to 2%, China should do the same. It would not be a major strain on the economy and investing in the MIC isn't necessarily the money drain it appears to be. There will be many opportunities to offset cost through weapons export.