Miscellaneous News

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
There is a difference between seeking to overthrow the CCP and criticising the elites for using their influence to keep people down or having special privileges normal citizens can't enjoy.
The post I responded to from Spring2017 talked about overthrowing the ruling class so that's where it came from. I have no qualms with criticizing unfair practices, although one needs to keep in mind that there is no government or elite entity that is completely fair so given that context, if China is particularly unfair in one area, it should be brought out for change.
Right. So what happens to the 99.9% of people who can't get into the elite?
They live regular lives working hard like the vast majority of the world.
China isn't western Europe with an excellent social welfare and public healthcare system.
China's healthcare system handled COVID a lot better than European ones did.
If you don't succeed in China you can, despite working hard, not end up with much. Otherwise you're suggesting that people in China are poor only if they don't work hard enough. That's the sort of patrician attitude China is supposed to be against.
You didn't have a Chinese father or you would have heard ad nauseum that if you end up poor, it's your fault for not working hard enough. But yes, given China's population to natural resources ratio, one can put up a good fight, fail, and end up with little. It was particularly true in the past but as Chinese society grows richer in total, this happens less and less. China is a developing country after all so the people have to gun it out as they have for decades now.
I hate to burst your bubble but the World Economic Forum would disagree with you.
Now now, that's a lie. Your whole purpose in the conversation is hoping to burst my bubble, but this is a steel bubble and you have a rubber needle.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Oh cool. Was this made by the same guys who made the pandemic readiness index? LOL right off the bat, I see that the US is not in the top 20. The top 20 is comprised mainly of anemic developed economies with basically very little growth potential or economic dynamism. That index is worth less than the paper it's printed on and it's virtual!
China is number 45 out of 82 countries. Yes, it's ahead of India, but it's clearly behind a long list of countries. You can't have a comparison list of just China and India - it doesn't help ordinary Chinese people who deserve more.
Who said India? Did you just say India and tell me not to say India???

And yeah, Chinese people naturally deserve more than Indians, right? India embraces the democracy that the British left them with, then when a China that bucked all imperial influences including British ones leaves India the dust, the British disown them and casually say of course being Chinese, you deserve more and can't compare yourselves to lowly India. That's real nice to your former colony and followers...
I thought the US was still ahead, but maybe you're talking about annual growth. Anyway, the number of billionaires is partly down to the population. India has the third most in the world after the US & China, but you wouldn't argue that means their society is in good shape.
Why do you keep bringing up India???
The chance of an ordinary Chinese person becoming rich is still very low and, as I've pointed out, social mobilty and inequality remains bad in China.
You've pointed it out but supported it poorly. China is a meritocracy as much as any country should be and if you have an innovative tech idea, the environment for development in China is the best in the world for your advancement especially given the tech war. China's not an old European economy where people can expect to be taken care of even it they do very little and that's what drives China forward. It is the pursuit of a good living, then an elite status, but not the guarantee of obtaining either. China's economy is young; there is much fighting to do. It cannot be a comfortable slouch like some small developed economies with neither national goal nor rival.
It's better than it was in 1949, but it's nothing to justify telling people they need to obey the rich and powerful without question.
No one said to obey without question. You made this up. I clearly said,

"Chinese people just need to do their best to develop themselves as best they could, because the government has already made a system that will harness that energy to drive the nation with. As long as they don't hate or try to attack the wealthy and successful Chinese, they can find by natural competition where they'd like to work, do their best for their bosses while the smarter ones look for opportunities to start their own businesses, and the system will do the rest."

Do you have a reading comprehension problem?
That suggests the only thing that matters is growth. If it mostly goes into the pockets of the elite, who use their power to deny social security and support to those who need it, it's of no use to most people.
But this is a huge "if" that is not applicable to China because Chinese society and wages overall are growing rapidly and more Chinese people have been lifted out of poverty than anywhere in the world. But also, national growth is the most important thing, at least for China because all Chinese know from history that we will be robbed into paupers for weakness. Better to work hard and not have as much as you'd like while building a better future for your children than to have nothing but a foreign boot on your neck. We are a generation that has to work hard and take risk, not a generation that can slack off and expect handouts. Chinese people have come to accept that; you don't need to complain for us, thanks.
If that was the case then there would be no successful small companies, only mega-corporations headed by the richest people in the world. Indeed, large companies often grow by buying up smaller competitors and purchasing their intellectual property. Not always of course, but it happens quite a lot.
Another if LOL
No, because I don't work on 5G. I'd be really worried if a Chief Executive knew nothing about the area they worked in.

He probably couldn't hold a conversation with me on the field I work in, so what does that prove? Does it mean I'm his equal? Or that he's not as smart as you think he is?
Wow, you are really bad at getting the point. What field do you work on? You think you're more capable than the owner and bosses? Do you work in a tech field? As I said, "The stupid never see the brilliance of others because it goes over their heads." But we all like to pretend that we're not higher up just due to the circumstances and that we're no worse than anything else, even if every measure says it's false.
If that was true China would have much better social mobility and be a less unequal society (measured by gini coefficient).
There is no logical reason for this conclusion. You can say it for any country with any mobility but any system that evaluates small anemic developed nations as its highest is clearly flawed.
I'm happy for you to post one more message if you want, so I'll just say this.
Doesn't matter what you'd be happy with and I'll post as much as I see fit.
Being able to criticise elites is important. Elites frequently want to pay next to no tax and usually oppose good social security on the basis they'll be made to pay for it. In a country like China where even talking about political reform can get you jailed, public pressure on the amount of tax they pay and what social projects can be funded with said taxation is important. It's not just about medical or unemployment support, it's also about education especially for rural areas that always get left behind.
China is a country that comes down and curbs its own megacorps and elites when they behave inappropriately or overstep the line for how much power they are allowed to have. To many people's shock, even midst the tech war, China clamps down on its own mega tech companies. The issues that you see are not in China but a reflection of your own society.
Otherwise China will remain an extremely unequal society because those at the top will keep kicking off those that try to climb up the ladder.
Which is why China mints almost half the new billionaires in the world with less than a quarter of the population. Those indices and coefficients rarely get exposed for their uselessness but when it happens like in COVID, it's spectacular.
 
Last edited:

Strangelove

Colonel
Registered Member
BREAKING
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Wow this is HUGE
They wanted to genocide the Chinese

No one should be surprised by this, they built their country by exterminating the Native Americans while enslaving Africans. It should be noted that Hitler's ideas of race and living space in Russia drew inspiration from the history of America.

In any case if they didn't have the balls to use nukes back then, what's the chances of using them now? Kim and Iranian Ayatollahs also understand that being armed to the teeth is required when facing evil.
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
Not really. No fighters were sent up to force it to land, nor were fake bomb threats made. The plane had to land due to issues regarding fuel levels.

Bolivia claimed that a number of countries closed their airspace, which appears to have been true. However, the plane had the option of reversing course to allow for a different route to be plotted after refuelling. It does not, for example, appear to have been trapped over Austrian airspace.

Because they're not comparable

Here we have it folks. I know he wont reply because in his head, hes already blocked me out. But as you are all aware, there's no way we can let such blaten rewriting of history going on here.

The above two statements proved how much mind gymnastic he has to perform in his head to justify the two incidents are so different? That one is justify, whilst the other is an act of war!

Now now, that's a lie. Your whole purpose in the conversation is hoping to burst my bubble, but this is a steel bubble and you have a rubber needle.

Oh cool. Was this made by the same guys who made the pandemic readiness index? LOL right off the bat, I see that the US is not in the top 20

That index is worth less than the paper it's printed on and it's virtual!

Who said India? Did you just say India and tell me not to say India???

Why do you keep bringing up India??

No one said to obey without question. You made this up. I clearly said,

Do you have a reading comprehension problem?

You do know he's our resident mind twisting champion. Right?
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Here we have it folks. I know he wont reply because in his head, hes already blocked me out. But as you are all aware, there's no way we can let such blaten rewriting of history going on here.
Oh, he hasn't blocked you out. He's "blocked me out" too but that only remains when he knows he can't debate you. When you say something that he thinks he finds an opportunity on, he's Johnny-on-the-spot to try to getcha, and then when he realizes that that was no mistake you made and you can lay his arguments out on the concrete just like old times, his ears droop down and he gives the, "I'll let you get the last word" escape.
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
Oh, he hasn't blocked you out. He's "blocked me out" too but that only remains when he knows he can't debate you. When you say something that he thinks he finds an opportunity on, he's Johnny-on-the-spot to try to getcha, and then when he realizes that that was no mistake you made and you can lay his arguments out on the concrete just like old times, his ears droop down and he gives the, "I'll let you get the last word" escape.

Oh yes I know and completely agreed with your assessment of his modus operandi. Which is why I said "in his head, he's blocked me". Oh yes, he's lurking here, and will jump on any perceived mistakes or weakness in our arguments. And when that happens, he will latch on like a limpet.

Anyway, I just loved the way you picked his arguments apart. And as to why he keeps mentioning India, god only knows! Lol
 

voyager1

Captain
Registered Member
And as to why he keeps mentioning India, god only knows! Lol
He is hoping for this
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

but instead what is truly happening is this
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

He is probably agitated due to the India failing to damage China.

1st try was the border skirmish
2nd was all this talk about India becoming West' New China and taking its manufacturing

I dont know about you but IMO both of these failed
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Twitter India being raided by Indian Police.


The real reason? It refused to remove the "Manipulated Media" tag from a BJP leaders fake tweet which targeted the opposition Congress.

Do watch how this blatant harassment wont get reported extensively in the West. Blinken wouldve screamed his lungs out if China did something similar to Twitter office in HK .

And India is the largest democracy on Earth.
 
Top