2 wafers glue together face to face.How are logic folding chips being made? Are they layers being fabbed seperately and then used advanced packaging to glue together? Or they use multiple pattening to build up the 3d structure?
2 wafers glue together face to face.How are logic folding chips being made? Are they layers being fabbed seperately and then used advanced packaging to glue together? Or they use multiple pattening to build up the 3d structure?
Actually I can't wrap my head around this fact. For last 8 years, I kept thinking how can China get to frontier logic (using the traditional pathway TSMC Samsung, Intel took). But they used proper definition of thinking outside the box to come up with a different path to leading edge.There is nothing that can unify a country faster than an outside threat.
Not necessary. To start there were other options apart from them and their market share in the smartphone business dropped like stone. What they did is that they innovated fast, to survive they moved to other business ventures like software, mining and automation. Then they started to go in guerrilla war against the US to get their supply chain in check were they injected Huawei style management to a lot of Chinese companies. Then they focused on innovation rather than raw power to get smartphone users back and now the are focusing on innovating in semiconductors redesigning decades of standard practices to get that performance they need.
China currently manufacture one of the best diesel Engines globally. in-fact they exported more ICE cars up until recent Iranian war changed the dimension. Geely not only has its own ICE engines, but it is also a global powerhouse in combustion and hybrid powertrain technology. by the time Chinese EV industry leapfrog its competitors they did also become competitive in ICE tech.Actually I can't wrap my head around this fact. For last 8 years, I kept thinking how can China get to frontier logic (using the traditional pathway TSMC Samsung, Intel took). But they used proper definition of thinking outside the box to come up with a different path to leading edge.
Its very very similar to how China played the car industry, they realized they would not be able to catch up in ICE, so they took a entirely different route EV and succeed remarkably.
These next 5 years 2026-2030, we are gonna be witnessing the Golden Age of Chinese Semiconductor Industry, Stay Tuned Chinese Semiconductor Thread II
But can they scale to proportions to take market share from TSMC and others?Actually I can't wrap my head around this fact. For last 8 years, I kept thinking how can China get to frontier logic (using the traditional pathway TSMC Samsung, Intel took). But they used proper definition of thinking outside the box to come up with a different path to leading edge.
Its very very similar to how China played the car industry, they realized they would not be able to catch up in ICE, so they took a entirely different route EV and succeed remarkably.
These next 5 years 2026-2030, we are gonna be witnessing the Golden Age of Chinese Semiconductor Industry, Stay Tuned Chinese Semiconductor Thread II
Nobody's going to put up with inferior compute, but Huawei has consistently superior end user performance than rivals because it has superior tech stack from chip all the way to OS. Huawei was banned because it has superior tech, and it sells well because it has superior tech.
Not to say US didn't help, there is high correlation between patriotic people and successful people (literally demonstrated from studies), so US hostility allowed Huawei to focus on high end, high margin products like Mate X and Matebook Fold and still sell in large numbers, something no other competitors can do.
Not necessary. To start there were other options apart from them and their market share in the smartphone business dropped like stone. What they did is that they innovated fast, to survive they moved to other business ventures like software, mining and automation. Then they started to go in guerrilla war against the US to get their supply chain in check were they injected Huawei style management to a lot of Chinese companies. Then they focused on innovation rather than raw power to get smartphone users back and now the are focusing on innovating in semiconductors redesigning decades of standard practices to get that performance they need.
True, market sie does matter as well, especially when it means trying to developed a new software operations system when the world already uses a mature widespread ubiquitous established operating system for years now, to justify such blare investment you need a huge market, without that Huawei wouldnt be sucesful. China's population size helps the country alot. Which is why the degrading collapsing birth rate is worrying for this coming decades . However, for the short term it's not a problem yet but long term if it keeps falling this way then yes it would be a huge issue decades from nowPeople actually did put up inferior compute in Huawei products. You can say that it might not matter that much for an average user which is probably true, but for gaming or intense applications it does matter. Normally people won't compromise on even compute, but they did for indigenous innovation.
If Huawei was present in any other country like Korea or Japan, it couldn't survive because the domestic market is too small to merit creating the whole stack from scratch including the OS for example.
Technology (including semiconductors) needs market and a certain amount of scale to function, finance itself, and create an ecosystem. That was possible because of China's market size. I hope China maintains that market size.
Nobody ever said China is taking a different path, there's nothing about logic folding or SSMB any other advanced techniques that precludes EUV, just as half of Chinese auto export are actually ICE and EVs didn't preclude China from dominating ICE export too.Actually I can't wrap my head around this fact. For last 8 years, I kept thinking how can China get to frontier logic (using the traditional pathway TSMC Samsung, Intel took). But they used proper definition of thinking outside the box to come up with a different path to leading edge.
Its very very similar to how China played the car industry, they realized they would not be able to catch up in ICE, so they took a entirely different route EV and succeed remarkably.
These next 5 years 2026-2030, we are gonna be witnessing the Golden Age of Chinese Semiconductor Industry, Stay Tuned Chinese Semiconductor Thread II
TSMC isn't a long term competitor. TSMC is Chinese in the long term, or you can even say medium to short term considering it's 2026.But can they scale to proportions to take market share from TSMC and others?

95% smartphones users don't care about CPU metrics, a big chunk don't even game at all <they use it for internet related stuff like social media>. The vast majority of games are not even that demanding on smartphones. Most smartphones users care about features, like how good the camera is, how responsive the screen is, how good their favorite apps run, how long the battery will last, how well built the thing is. And best of all the app store. And that could had damage Huawei in China more than the processor. Because as long the processor can match or surpass user feature expectations, most people won't care.People actually did put up inferior compute in Huawei products. You can say that it might not matter that much for an average user which is probably true, but for gaming or intense applications it does matter. Normally people won't compromise on even compute, but they did for indigenous innovation.