I find it deeply offensive that these little mfers think they can out-Temu China.
Their goal is to deliver Temu quality at Rolex price to maximize shareholder value.
I find it deeply offensive that these little mfers think they can out-Temu China.
Hearing now the insecurity from US military tech bros because of the parade. Good luck finding the money for this guy’s idea of launching millions of drones onto China’s factories. Maybe he misspoke being a child acting like an adult but millions of $400,000 drones aren’t cheap.
Mach Industries... and this engine
View attachment 160234
It looks too familiar... WAIT!
How can he still show his face on TV?
This is bad news. I think China has to work on their defense system more. First it was the HQ9 defense system for Pak that didn't shoot down Brahmos on many occasions.
Only the offensive system seems to be working as expected.
China already had regular contact and trade with the West by the Ming Dynasty. That’s why we hear about “antique Ming vases” from pop culture.
The narrative of the Qiaolong emporer being ignorant and arragont leader honestly needs to die because the truth is that he limited trade with the west because he was aware of the Brits using trade to establish monopolies and take over India and Malaya because the Qing dynasty had traders there. Also alot of westerners already operated during the Qing dynasty pre Opium wars, how else do you think Voltaire got inspiration from the Qing dynasty. The narrative was established by the western world rewriting history and the early KMT being brainwashed by it and making it common knowledge. The Qing dynasty despite being infamously weak managed to keep most of their gains for future government and even gave France(Yunnan) and Russia(Xinjiang) a bloody nose.
you can find stuff like EV ranges and other short comings of EVs (suspension cannot cope with desert travel, heat eating EV tires much sooner, air conditioning, brakes) when wealthy people put them in long term test and than gave them to there servants as used cars. The point i am making you should not expect these thing to work on there standards . Just look at price of deals they do with Boeing and Airbus. Its always seem way higher to maintain best support.This is bad news. I think China has to work on their defense system more. First it was the HQ9 defense system for Pak that didn't shoot down Brahmos on many occasions.
Only the offensive system seems to be working as expected.
According to reliable sources, the S-350 system boasts impressive operational capabilities. It can engage aerodynamic air targets, such as aircraft, drones, cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, and similar devices, at ranges of 120 to 150 kilometers, as well as effectively engage ballistic targets at a maximum range of 25 kilometers. He noted that while the S-350 anti-aircraft missile system is comparable to the Patriot, the Russian missiles are faster and can hit low-flying targets.
He said the Patriot system does not shoot down targets flying at an altitude of less than 100 meters, while the S-350 shoots down targets at an altitude of 10 meters and higher.
This "achievement" represents the first instance of the system operating fully automatically using artificial intelligence in combat conditions. At the time, the S-350 system was capable of operating in both active and passive radar modes simultaneously
The US has already broken the taboo of covertly assassinating Chinese engineers and civilians through their use of the Balochistan terrorists. China should seriously consider utilizing some of the same types of covert action that the US uses for those that are espousing high levels of dangerous bellicosity like this…
Hearing now the insecurity from US military tech bros because of the parade. Good luck finding the money for this guy’s idea of launching millions of drones onto China’s factories. Maybe he misspoke being a child acting like an adult but millions of $400,000 drones aren’t cheap.
Seems like obvious bullshit invented by the western MSM to smear China.
You have the usual red flags of anonymous former foreign officials making generalised allegations never before aired that sounds just plausible enough without much in the way of specifics that can be fact checked.
The one specific claim made immediately sounds like utter bullshit that a laser needed to continuously lase a target for 15-30 minutes to bring it down. At what range and approach speed does he think those engagements are taking place to give the laser that kind of engagement time?! Clearly whoever invented that claim didn’t pass kindergartens maths, so obviously American.
Similarly, arguing that you needed line of sight to engage targets and claiming that to be a notable limiting factor for the Saudi local environment displays a clear lack of basic understanding of weapons engagement, laser point defence effective ranges and local geography.
Lasers, especially small ones like what is used, will not have engagement ranges above double digits KMs. The targets the Chinese lasers were deployed to defend were generally oil refineries and the like, which didn’t have any line of sight limitations. Not only did whoever invented those claims not have any real local knowledge, they were also incredibly lazy to not even bother with basic research.
On balance, this feels like a ChatGPT written trash piece that some intern cooked up.
View attachment 86247
Seems like someone got themselves an official commendation for downing a lot of UAVs with the Silent Hunter.
Certificate for intercept.
![]()
Skyshield laser anti-drone system developed by CETC successfully shot down 21 (Houthies) drones while defending Saudi Arabia's PAC-3 battery, shot down 36 drones in total in various countries, achieving a 100% first-time interception rate
"The command, electronic reconnaissance and jamming, radar, and laser interception capabilities of the protection systems have been fully tested."
View attachment 155329
View attachment 155328