Chinese infantry fighting vehicles

BillRamengod

Junior Member
Registered Member
17554055823061.jpeg88fe57e5gy1i4guku2pfvj20l10fdwh0.jpg
It appears that some crew members of the Gen4 support vehicle (not sure what shold we call it) are wearing AR goggles.

It most likely interoperates with distributed optical sensors to provide functionality similar to the F-35 pilot helmet's 'see-through' capability to enhance their battlefield awareness.

doubleob1.jpg
 

by78

General
A high-resolution version of a previously shared image showing the drone being carried by the new PLAGF IFV.

54726964753_79db22a07f_o.jpg
 

tankphobia

Senior Member
Registered Member
A high-resolution version of a previously shared image showing the drone being carried by the new PLAGF IFV.

54726964753_79db22a07f_o.jpg
This drone doesn't look tethered, I wonder if it would not be better to just have tube launched version instead so troops don't need to physically get out during combat to setup/launch a recon drone.
 

bsdnf

Junior Member
Registered Member
Possible, but we need a close up. It could just be the paint.
The paint job is so remarkably similar to LiDAR that it doesn't fit in with the drone's overall paint. It's hard to explain why this paint job was intentional.

I even suspect it's a custom LiDAR design that rotate coaxially with the motor
 

Schwerter_

Junior Member
Registered Member
The paint job is so remarkably similar to LiDAR that it doesn't fit in with the drone's overall paint. It's hard to explain why this paint job was intentional.

I even suspect it's a custom LiDAR design that rotate coaxially with the motor
tbh the paint job looks almost identical to industrial/lab use large-ish motors, I'd say it's just exposed external rotor motors, pretty standard stuff for drones.

a few images included to show similar paintjobs in the wild.

1755453547209.png1755453647560.png1755453872342.png1755453898607.png
 

BillRamengod

Junior Member
Registered Member
A high-resolution version of a previously shared image showing the drone being carried by the new PLAGF IFV.

54726964753_79db22a07f_o.jpg


1755452157433.png

Double checked, the Camera unit (red) is not hard-connected to the drone fuselage (blue), but rather attached to the landing gear (green) via a tether system (yellow).
54726964753_79db22a07f_o1.jpg

I'm genuinely curious about the reasoning behind this. Is it because the airframe vibrations during flight would interfere with the camera's operation? Or is this some kind of off-the-shelf product modified for temporary use?

Any thought?
 
Last edited:
Top