Trump 2.0 official thread

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

RFK Jr.'s autism study to amass medical records of many Americans​

The National Institutes of Health is amassing private medical records from a number of federal and commercial databases to give to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s new effort to study autism, the NIH's top official said Monday.

The new data will allow external researchers picked for Kennedy's autism studies to study "comprehensive" patient data with "broad coverage" of the U.S. population for the first time, NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya said.

"The idea of the platform is that the existing data resources are often fragmented and difficult to obtain. The NIH itself will often pay multiple times for the same data resource. Even data resources that are within the federal government are difficult to obtain," he said in a presentation to the agency's
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Medication records from pharmacy chains, lab testing and genomics data from patients treated by the Department of Veterans Affairs and Indian Health Service, claims from private insurers and data from smartwatches and fitness trackers will all be linked together, he said.

The NIH is also now in talks with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to broaden agreements governing access to their data, Bhattacharya said.

In addition, a new disease registry is being launched to track Americans with autism, which will be integrated into the data. Advocacy groups and experts have called out Kennedy for describing autism as a "preventable disease," which they say is stigmatizing and unfounded.

Between 10 and 20 outside groups of researchers will be given grant funding and access to the records to produce Kennedy's autism studies. Bhattacharya did not give details on how they would be chosen, but said their selection would be "run through normal NIH processes."

Bhattacharya said the research they will back using the data will be "the highest quality proposals" that will range "from basic science to epidemiological approaches, to other more applied approaches" to treat and manage autism. He also acknowledged autism's wide variation in how it affects people.

"I recognize, of course, that autism, there's a range of manifestations ranging from highly functioning children to children that are quite severely disabled. And of course the research will account very carefully for that," he said.

While the selected researchers will be able to access and study the private medical data, Bhattacharya said they will not be able to download it. He promised "state of the art protections" to protect confidentiality.

By bringing the data into one place, he said it could give health agencies a window into "real-time health monitoring" on Americans for studying other health problems too.

"What we're proposing is a transformative real-world data initiative, which aims to provide a robust and secure computational data platform for chronic disease and autism research," he said.

They are planning a "rapid timeline" to launch the autism research using this data, he said, but did not give specifics on when it would start or how long the studies would take. Kennedy last week appeared to walk back his earlier prediction that they would have all the answers to autism's causes by September.

Speaking with reporters on Tuesday, Bhattacharya pushed back the timeline, saying that they now hope to have grants going out the door by September for the research.

"It's hard to guarantee when science will make an advance. It depends on, you know, nature has its say," Bhattacharya said.
Medication records from pharmacy chains, lab testing and genomics data from patients treated by the Department of Veterans Affairs and Indian Health Service, claims from private insurers and data from smartwatches and fitness trackers will all be linked together, he said.

A database of what autistic people do. What could go wrong.
 

zyklon

Junior Member
Registered Member
The China hawks are not interested in a win-win situation. They see it as a zero sum game. It is all or nothing.

Many, if not most of the China Hawks around Trump genuinely believe China is evil and must be "
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
" in some
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
or
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

A lot of these guys treat "Freedom and Democracy" like a religion, and to them, the authoritarians of the CCP and the Chinese they govern are
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
who must be converted or conquered.

To quote
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, who wanted to appear polite about it:
What would winning look like? China’s communist rulers would give up trying to prevail in a hot or cold conflict with the United States and its friends. And the Chinese people—from ruling elites to everyday citizens—would find inspiration to explore new models of development and governance that don’t rely on repression at home and compulsive hostility abroad.

China Hawks are in many ways mirror images of salafist jihadis (who they also naturally detest), in their unrelenting sense of ideological superiority and utter intolerance for ideological deviance.

Why would they be interested in an win-win scearino

Out of desperation, perhaps to address another crisis or series of crisis elsewhere!

Considering Trump's propensity for self-sabotage, sooner or later he's going to seriously need Beijing for something, even more so than now.

At that point, he may very well rush into a "bad deal" if it's pitched to him in the right light to self-rationalize. :cool:
 

dingyibvs

Senior Member
China increasing consumption will simply mean domestic industries will provide the refined goods. That isn’t what the Americans want. The only way US goods will ever become financially viable for mass Chinese consumption is if China dismantles their own logistical supply chain and manufacturing capabilities. US goods are not competitive.



The China hawks are not interested in a win-win situation. They see it as a zero sum game. It is all or nothing. Their failed Kellogg plan that Zelensky blew up before Trump could tout it to Russia involved mass deployment of NATO troops. If they are unable to offer the Russians the bare minimum of concessions for a freeze. Why would they be interested in an win-win scearino

Of course they wouldn't be, but Trump would. As you can see, he's willing to settle for anything that involves him appearing to win now, even if it involves China winning as well which he'll spin it as his own win anyway. We know China will mostly just consume more of what it produces, but he'll probably say something like "the Chinese will start buying more, a lot more, including our great oil, coal, gas, and soybeans from our great farmers. And we'll finally get to ditch those freeloading Japanese and Filipinos, they're China's problem now."
 

GulfLander

Major
Registered Member
Britain, America's #1 vassal in Europe, if not in the world (depending on how you categorize Israel), is in the process of expropriating a private Chinese company's lawful interests in a local steel factory.


If America wants Chinese factories to move stateside, then it must demonstrate its commitment to protecting the property rights of private Chinese businesses, especially given
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


It's time for Uncle Sam to remind Britain what freedom™ is all about: for itself, for the Chinese owned factories that will Make America Great Again®, and for the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(or robots) that will toil in those factories!




In all seriousness, there's an "easy" offramp for Trump: invade and if necessary occupy Iran, Venezuela, Cuba and/or another country lacking nuclear weapons.

Such a conflict or conflicts will allow Trump to:
  1. Stimulate the economy via national defense expenditures.
  2. Reduce unemployment by way of military recruitment, or if appropriate even national mobilization.
  3. Quietly suspend tariffs in the name of national security while the public and world are focused on the "shock and awe" above Tehran, Caracas, Havana and/or wherever.
  4. Strengthen domestic support from major donors (e.g. Israel Lobby) and/or key demographics (e.g. Florida's "anti-Castro" Cuban exiles) for attacking a (perceived) foreign enemy.
  5. Achieve a "rally around the flag" effect to the benefit of his own approval rating, especially if the conflict can be framed as just retaliation and righteous revenge against unwarranted foreign aggression (or just a false flag attack).
This will obviously inch the world closer to WW3, but that's not going to stop Trump if it's his popularity and legacy that's on the line.
Will UK nationalize the other steel plant that closed before too?
There's no more LKY anymore. His children don't know what it's like to fight like him so they're spineless cucks. It doesn't help Singapore is getting Indianized slowly.

I actually avoid stuff like CNA now coz what they have released these days is garbage.
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
That’s just circular reasoning where you arbitrarily set the 5% and 2% growth rates and then use that as evidence that the total economic collapse of the U.S. economy won’t have any major impact on either party. It’s totally nonsense on the same level as arguing that the collapse of the USSR was no big deal to Russians.

China has always offered a win-win relationship arguing that the world is big enough to accommodate both China and America. But America has now declared that one of the two needs to die, so China will do all in its power to make sure it’s America that is the one who dies at the end.

It would be the height of stupidity to go back to business as usual with someone when they just tried to kill you, just because he failed utterly in his attempt. If you are stupid enough to do that, all you will earn is a knife in the back later from the same guy. Only next time he might not fumble his attack so completely, and you will deserve to die for giving him another bite at the cherry. China doesn’t do that kind of stupid.

Okay, you lost me here. I got no idea what you are talking about.

I think you take the Americans too seriously. Why you listening to those clowns.

China will do, what is in the best interest of China, which is what it always does.

In this case, this current trade war, the tariffs will come down to a lower level, by both sides, and then they probably will call it a day.

Just my opinion, with all the other issues, there will be no resolution, and they will not even negotiate about it.

Then, next, China will go on continue to do, what it has always been doing, as long as I been alive, which is undermine American power, anywhere it can. Whether China directly trying to undermine America, or indirectly, does not matter, one side gets stronger.

That is how the CCP always played this geopolitical game.

Now if we think a worldwide financial crisis is advantageous to the PRC, I would bet the CCP will not want to go there.
 

nativechicken

Junior Member
Registered Member
Doesn't negate my point on the true purpose of the policy, which is to force orders from Chinese yards to Japs and Korean yards.
Have you watched the video?
You don’t understand one thing: the production capacity of South Korea and Japan cannot be further expanded. There are no additional industrial capabilities, a lack of more shipyards and domestic component supply chains (millions of distinct industrial components—no one can produce them without China), not to mention policy uncertainties—now targeting China, but they could be next in the future. Forcing them to incur losses is easier than forcing China to do so. Additionally, shipbuilding orders in Japan and South Korea are already backlogged until 2028. Currently, only China has the production capacity to meet global shipping demands.

Shipping companies could assign all Japanese and Korean ships to serve the U.S. market, then uniformly raise freight rates for U.S.-bound routes (regardless of whether Chinese ships are used). This equates to imposing a unified tariff on global shipments to the U.S.—exactly what’s happening now. This will only weaken America’s competitiveness further.
 

broadsword

Brigadier
Have you watched the video?
You don’t understand one thing: the production capacity of South Korea and Japan cannot be further expanded. There are no additional industrial capabilities, a lack of more shipyards and domestic component supply chains (millions of distinct industrial components—no one can produce them without China), not to mention policy uncertainties—now targeting China, but they could be next in the future. Forcing them to incur losses is easier than forcing China to do so. Additionally, shipbuilding orders in Japan and South Korea are already backlogged until 2028. Currently, only China has the production capacity to meet global shipping demands.

Shipping companies could assign all Japanese and Korean ships to serve the U.S. market, then uniformly raise freight rates for U.S.-bound routes (regardless of whether Chinese ships are used). This equates to imposing a unified tariff on global shipments to the U.S.—exactly what’s happening now. This will only weaken America’s competitiveness further.

Am I right, those are the reasons the production capacity of South Korea and Japan cannot be further expanded?
 
Top