A former Chief of the Australian Defence Force (1998-2002), retired Admiral Chris Barrie, has
on the idea that China's transit
or live fire exercises in the Tasman Sea were unprecedented in their conduct or notification practices. I quote:
These live fire exercises were conducted on the high seas ... it's perfectly legitimate behaviour under international law. It's something that we ourselves do and I've done... frankly, it's almost none of our business provided it's conducted on the high seas.
What about when there are flights going over the area?
Well this happens all the time. In my case I've done these live fire drills at sea where air routes are over the top. What we do is use our sensors to make sure there are no aircraft in the vicinity that we can detect, and we use the aviation guard frequency to warn off any aircraft that we may not have detected.
Notably, PLAN broadcasting on guard frequency is how the first airliner-in-transit was alerted to these exercises, passing on to ATC who established the air corridor diverting other aircraft, thence to Airservices Australia, and thence to the ADF (with an independent, slower route of notification via RNZN).
I previously
intimated that the lack of a detailed analysis (as opposed to superficial bloviations from tabloid media and politicians) demonstrating how unprecedent and outrageous PLAN's conduct in the Tasman Sea was was rather suggestive, given that there are any number of actors who would appear motivated to make that analysis if it were indeed fruitful, and Admiral Barry's comments here only reinforce that suspicion. Also very noticeable is the silence from USN on the subject...