Miscellaneous News

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
THe most demoralising thing for americans/anglos/westerners isn't that training for Deepseek was only $5mln, but that Deepseek was actually a side project, and not the real thing to whatever the team were working on.


It's like anglo americans/anglo zionists are so committed to their paradigm/religion of white supremacy that they cannot conceive that Chinese could out-innovate ashkanazi and anglo IQ. You'd think the Einstein experience or Oppenheimer would've taught them that lesson, but it's evident that their white supremacist religion is too entrenched.
Why are the white American supremacist and muh innovation champs worried when they can simply replace the unthinking and copy paste Chyna with the true geniuses of our time: the Indians!!
 

9dashline

Captain
Registered Member
Huggingface is now in process of replicating Deepseek R1

Deepseek saved open source AI. The genie is out of bottle now. When everyone has free access to SOTA AI, then US has no moat....

Hardware is now the remaining bottleneck rate limiter (GPUs, EUV, etc)

In a few years Huawei will be competing with Nvidia and its truly game over.

 

Serb

Senior Member
Registered Member

Colour revolution in full swing in Serbia. Dunno if vuvic can make it out this time.


This is the beginning of the end of the West, and their plutocratic regimes only (to reply to this stupid Tweet).

Domestic Serbian traitors are mad because Trump at least couldn't care less about those small-time agents/NGOs globally.

Will probably totally forget about them and cut support, so they are inciting protests literally for NOTHING.

As these protests are fake, propelled artificially by the final last spasms before dying of these leeches.

They are lying openly and blatantly because protests against Milosevic were around x20 larger objectively (1 million people during peak, this is a few tens of thousands max).

And at that time Serbia was bombed to hell, whereas today it rises in industry in general, infrastructure in general, manufacturing, construction, etc. So, it's logical why there were so many more protesters then than there are now - people are much more content now.

There is no way they will be able to overthrow Vucic, he faced much larger protests at the beginning of his reign many years ago and survived easily (hundreds of thousands).

Vucic mastered the art of psychological manipulation to stay in power (since he couldn't use hard power to consolidate due to the West).

He beat the West at their own game, his propaganda is world-class, he owns all media, speaks the right way, etc.

Not to mention that he has real results to back him, real wages rising, jobs, FDI, exports, military, geopolitically, etc.
 

GZDRefugee

Senior Member
Registered Member

Eventine

Senior Member
Registered Member
Huggingface is now in process of replicating Deepseek R1

Deepseek saved open source AI. The genie is out of bottle now. When everyone has free access to SOTA AI, then US has no moat....

Hardware is now the remaining bottleneck rate limiter (GPUs, EUV, etc)

In a few years Huawei will be competing with Nvidia and its truly game over.

The fore runners on the LLM front are now Open AI (Microsoft), Google, Meta, Deep Seek, Anthropic (Amazon), Alibaba, and Byte Dance.

There's not enough market for all of these companies. The Western companies are mainly held up by scatter shot investment, where investors are hedging their bets by throwing money at all of them - similar to what they were doing during the internet bubble and bit coin bubble - so that they don't miss out on the winner. Open AI is currently the government favorite (Sam in the White House etc.), but Google probably has better long term fundamentals. There's also Musk's x AI, which could get a boost from Musk being in the government, but they've yet to show they're at the frontier.

If I had to bet, I would say that Google is most likely the eventual winner in the West, though Open AI is a close contender. The main reason I favor Google is because, despite both companies having great research teams, Google has the benefit of dominating search despite Microsoft's best attempts, and having that reliable, synergistic revenue stream outside of just selling chat bots makes their project much more sustainable. Nonetheless, Microsoft may come to dominate the LLM coding space, simply because they have existing leverage there with Visual Studio and GitHub. I don't much like Meta and Anthropic's chances - the chat bot business model sucks.

The situation is different in China. There is no "Chinese Google" because, we should be honest, Baidu sucks. The chances of them winning the LLM race are slim, despite the search advantage; and in any case, being the leading search engine in China is not the same, because the Chinese internet is fundamentally different from the English internet in that the former is much more diffused between various media formats, while the latter is arguably still concentrated in the text-based World Wide Web.

Productivity enhancement is going to be much more important, as such, in the Chinese market. Companies will favor the model that give them the most bang for the buck. LLM companies are currently competing on price, and in that domain, companies that have deep pockets and which can sustain low or even negative margins for a long time, has the advantage. Deep Seek has the benefit of being backed by their own hedge fund, but Byte Dance and Alibaba both also have their own revenue streams outside of AI. The question in this scenario is more around integrations - who will be able to capture the most third party partners and build the best ecosystem? So far it's not clear, but I think we will get much better clarity in 2025, specifically through answering questions like: 1) is Deep Seek going to beat the rest to o3, 2) will the next Qwen release be successful or a bust, and 3) how fast can Byte Dance leverage multi-modal capabilities and stand out from the rest?

2025 will prove to be an exciting year, and I hold onto my previous argument, which is that China doesn't have to win the AI race, it just needs to not lose it. Being a fast follower is fine - and more profitable - as long as you're close enough.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
A wise man once said, allow nothing get in the way of a great story; and Deep Seek is a great story. But end of the day, we need to sit down and talk about facts.

Deep Seek is not a super hero team of 200 IQ geniuses. They didn't "do the impossible." The reason they did what Big Tech. did with a fraction of the costs is because China does everything the US does at a fraction of the costs. It's the same reason BYD can sell an EV brand new for $11,500, but a "domestically built EV" cost $50,000+ in the US. It's why DJI can sell a drone for $500, but Skydio sells it at $2,000. It's why a medical procedure in China cost $500, but the same medical procedure in the US costs $5000.

It's the currency, stupid. Chinese labor, energy, infrastructure, food, medicine, everything seems absurdly cheap when converted to dollars. And that's what Deep Seek's costs were evaluated in - dollars. Nobody ever talks about the amount of energy they used to train the model and how that compares to the energy spent by other AI companies. No, we always talk about dollars, dollars, dollars - and that's the same story across every industry - China does it cheap. AI is just the latest to be hit by it.

Yes, there's a bit more to it than that. Institutional bloat - which doesn't just affect US Big Tech., but also Chinese Big Tech. companies like Baidu, Tencent, Alibaba, etc. - that also has tremendous costs. It's why Byte Dance is investing billions of dollars into the effort, while Deep Seek with its relatively small team with minimal middle management, could get away with a lot less. Fact is, if you have thirty Directors, Senior Directors, and Vice Presidents making millions of dollars a year each, it's going to cost you billions on compensation alone especially with all the usual corporate alignment, meetings, delays, etc.

But that's not just an US problem. That's a big corporation problem. It's why nobody in Chinese Big Tech. is claiming it's cheap. Because it isn't, when your corporation becomes that large.

Deep Seek's advantage is the advantage enjoyed by every Chinese company in competition vs. the US - cost. Their disadvantage will also be the same - it'll be hard for Deep Seek to keep hold of its talent in the coming days, as recruiters start reaching out to poach them for ten times the salary. But maybe that's okay. As long as China maintains a talent advantage vs. the US, and there's no shortage of young Chinese AI graduates hungry for fame and fortune, companies like Deep Seek can continue to surprise the world about Chinese costs in dollars.
here is the problem though. Even if Deepseek's total costs in RMB were converted to USD, they'd still have only spent around $50 million USD for a top tier model instead of $10 billion. So instead of a 2000x cheaper AI it is merely 200x cheaper.

This isn't like EV where it's like a 50% advantage.
 
Top