I can't say if that's what they're the best at relative to everything else they try to do, but on an objective level, they're not very good at it. Vietnam being the prime example.Iran doesn’t have the hard power to have a great chance of being able to inflict meaningful, lasting damage on the US (ie sink a carrier). So unless China wants to kick off AR in the next few months, there is little benefit to Iran and America going to blows.
The US today is also very different from the one under Bush, where no concern will be had about moral responsibility or humanitarian normals.
This means that in the event of open war between the US and Iran, there is almost zero prospect that the US would burden itself with occupation and nation building afterwards (which it supremely sucks at). Instead it will just do what it does best, blow shit up on an industrial scale, collapse economic, industrial and social order and not even make any token attempts at alleviating the suffering of Iranian civilians or preserving regional stability afterwards.
Russia is doing this strategy already and only 2 years in is it starting to show results, and I wonder how much is due to sustained bombing and how much is because of battlefield errors by enemy side.
Iran is well poised to defend itself, for years at least, maybe indefintely as unlike Ukraine they're drawing mobilization from a much deeper Shia/islamist recruit pool.
Ammo is a huge understatement. They face the choice of inefficiently firing off long range weapons, or get close and personal with glide bombs and penetration missions which will result in carnage to the US Air Force like happened in Vietnam.That means Iran will only cost America ammo, which can be quickly replenished. In turn, Russia and China will loose a valuable ally to distract and stretch American forces with.
Russia gets away with what its doing in Ukraine because Russia doesn't have any enemies outside of NATO and their economy is fully secured. US doesn't have the free pass to start huge shitstorms that Russia has.
Iran doesn't have to strike US/Israel now, it's not like they or their masters are on a strict timeline to achieve something. It'd be different if China/Russia was under more pressure to do something now. Wait 6 months, wait a year, situation will just be better.I think this is a major reason behind Russia rushing advanced weapons to Iran. Not to help fuel the fire but actually to try and control it because those new weapons won’t be operational for months if not years. The argument to Iran is, why fight now when you are so overmatched when if you wait a little, you will have all these shiny new weapons you can use that will greatly increase your odds.
I expect China to be making a similar offer on the economics side.
I think this Sino-Russian diplomacy is the main thing holding Iran back, and not because it’s truly cowed by Israeli and American military might.
US is the one that has to come to Iran sooner or later. Iran is a lot like Ukraine in that regard. Just by existing, they inevitably build up forces that will eventually overwhelm vulnerable territories whenever they feel like it. And just like West had a rare moment of clarity and pursued Minsk to give them time to arm up, it would be wise to just keep arming Iran until US inevitably has to go play in Iran's home court where they have an advantage.