Miscellaneous News

[Index]

Yup. Instead of Project 2025 it finna be Deagel 2025.

What is project 2025

 

[9dashline]

What is project 2025

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Basically PNAC but renewed at quarter century

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Index]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Basically PNAC but renewed at quarter century

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Wow. So basically regressing society to Gilead lite. Will surely be a fun time for 50% of the American population. Honestly, they can do whatever they want within their own home north American continent. But if they're hellbent on turning every military aged person into a weapon against China, then also we have more than enough production to neutralize every target they present to us.

The greatest difficulty is convincing a majority of Chinese people to carry out this undertaking. But we shall hopefully see such a shift in the consciousness in China within this decade.

 

[PikeCowboy]

As part of NATO's own salami slicing campaign in relation to China, its promoting regular "visits" of political figures to Taiwan and is aiming to normalize such interaction, and even encouraging such personalities to refer to Taiwan as a "Country", perhaps this is also to test China's red lines when it comes to Taiwan, and if there is no reaction from China, NATO will continue with more provocative actions.

This is actually state to provincial level ties, kind of appropriate

 

[jiajia99]

These white liberal politicians are dam annoying always bringing up human rights and some white savior bullcrap if you going to visted a country especially China talk about business if not GTFO and leave.

In the past, such disruptive and useless ministers would have physically removed from the world due to how much of a walking liability they are to the nation. The fact this Karen hasn’t been let go by now means that either the foreign forces their still want her there or the nation in question has been weakened so much that it is impossible to remove her in any normal way but given how unpopular she is, I am surprised that no one has dare raised a fist against this walking drama queen.

Seize all US assets and investments until full US debt repayment + indemnities for American wars in Asia.

If the American thief tries to sneak into our house, many Americans must die to pay off the debt incurred. They have grown too complacent in the last years after China wrongly aided them with support during covid. We never should have sold them life saving equipment, as they would not do the same for us. They need to be culled to be reminded of their place.

That figure from the USA must be plucked from their ass because in terms of harm and damage to the world, the world vastly outstrips the rest of the world by a factor of 1000. In the future if the USA collapses from all of its problems, how about the USA first be striped of its right to be a nation and have the rest of the world start stripping the USA of its wealth and treasure because it’s clear to the world that the USA is a walking liability to human progress and the rest of the world would benefit from this nation no longer being allowed an say in the affairs of the future of the world ever again. China brings hope for the future, the USA brings suffering, thus one can be removed from the equation and no one would miss them at all (everyone here knows which to pick)

 

[horse]

Joseph Needham is over rated and did not really understood China, just better than others, and the Needham question is simply human nature. People will go do things that make them powerful, rich, and have a good life. Since bretton woods II, when the USD is not pegged to gold anymore, most US elites will go into law(government officials), finance(rich), medical(rich) and away from STEM. For China, before the imperial examination, there are elites doing science in the han dynasty. After imperial examination, all smart chinese are learning Confucianism classics. This is simply human nature, and so if Joseph Needham know China better, he would not have asked the Needham question.

Question for you.

How many of Needham's work, Science and Civilization in China, have you actually read?

Myself, I read maybe 100 pages. There was just too much. Back then there was like already 10 volumes.

Then he kind of added another 10 volumes, for over 20 volumes, of work (something like, I don't even how many volumes there are), all from ancient Chinese texts, all in the view of the lens of a Western trained scientists a prominent one, all he did was dig all the ancient to find all or any scientific thought of China and accomplishments of over 2000-3000 thousand years.

People may not always agree with some of his conclusion in parts of those volumes, but people from what I remember they were in awe that he was able to read everything, literary everything, write something like that.

What we are talking about here, really is a work that is like one of the Imperial Chinese Dynasty historical records. Inside a Chinese library, if we saw how volumes there are in the dynastic histories, that is what Joseph Needham was able to do.

Unless you are a prominent Western trained scientist, or have read this work of Needham's, or dug through ancient Chinese texts looking for engineering and science, then I cannot see how you can make those comments.

 

[_killuminati_]

China isn't a hardline country; we are very diplomatic. We are also the only country that is on course to become more powerful than the US unless something drastic changes. That means China has the most to lose from rocking the boat and extremism, or as we Chinese like to say, "to tear up faces." We are rivals with uneasy relationships with the West, but we are not hardline enemies, not even with the US, despite the irreconcilable differences. We maintain working relationships with them. This is because while there is much struggle from them to change it and from us to maintain it, we still benefit more from the relationship than they do. So to tear up everyone's faces and burn those bridges serves us no good. It's also why we don't just declare to the West that Russia is our ally and we will provide them with everything we see fit with no limits so they should quit their fantasies and incessant nagging. As long as they're so exhausted and desperate that they can still be fooled into continuing their relationship with us under the false hope that we are indeed neutral, we will allow them to continue making that mistake, for our benefit. No need to slap them awake with fierce enmity... not yet.

This doesn't really answer the question: what prevents China from adopting a policy towards a sanctioned Iran that is similar to a sanctioned Russia? Or in other words, why is deepening relations with Iran akin to burning bridges with the West, but not when relations are deepened with Russia whom now is more heavily sanctioned by the West?

 

[horse]

A question for everybody, regarding Joseph Needham.

Who invented the suspension bridge?

The Chinese invented the suspension bridge.

I know that because I saw a picture in one of Joseph Needham's work. The diagram he pulled from some ancient Chinese text, predates any suspension bridge anywhere in the world for like maybe 100 years or more. There is no doubt the Chinese invented the suspension bridge. The evidence is right there.

That article posted earlier, written by some Western person, said that the Chinese are not good at going from 0 to 1 , but are really good from going from 1 to 99.

Inventing the suspension bridge, that is going from 0 to 1. There is whole history of innovation, in engineering and science there in China, and this what we are talking about.

Needham went out of his way to try to find it, it became his life this work of scholarship. Too bad I never had a chance to read more, because, life got in the way.

 

[daifo]

Cool if true

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1809981225651610035

 

[AssassinsMace]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Another example where the Western media wants to deflect a story about Americans raping Japanese children to be about how evil China is victimizing Japan because they won't buy their radioactive fish.

All trade is in the end about making money because money is the key to getting anything. Money is money no matter if it comes from selling advanced technology or selling fruits and vegetables. You hear from US pundits and think tanks about how they want to undermine China's economy as a whole because that's what fueling China's economic and technological rise. Is China selling advanced technology that no one else has hence they're making lots of money. No. That's why the US and Europe are in panic when China doesn't buy what they're okay with selling to China because in the end money is money and they need it.

Rahm Emanuel still being the face of selling Japanese fish? I thought he was the US ambassador to Japan. Does Rahm Emanuel think he's a movie star where he can endorse a product and people will buy it? And he thinks he has that kind of star power in China where he can get Chinese to buy and eat radioactive fish. This shows you how selling the little stuff is just as important as selling the big stuff. China not buying their fruits and vegetables is just as powerful as them not selling their advanced technology to China. You know how they were taunting that Huawei and therefore China was going to collapse because of Western sanctions? Not buying their fruits and vegetables can have the same effect on them.