Miscellaneous News

Randomuser

Major
Registered Member
Didn't the West claim that protests are illegal in China and any protestors found will be rolled over by a Type 59 tank?

View attachment 125630

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

View attachment 125631
The west seems to really have a lot of doublethink these days. Guess 1984 was a reflection of themselves.

You know how they try to say both sides are bad when you call them out on hypocrisy? They can't actually do that and doublethink is a result of it.
 

siegecrossbow

Field Marshall
Staff member
Super Moderator

You probably know who Drew Pavlou is. The anti China shill who got kicked out of uni in Australia.

What I didn't expect is he's now picking a fight with Nassim Taleb. The Black Swan guy who pretty damn well known if you're in finance. Never thought I would see the day.

Why is it his business who Nassim subscribes to on Twitter? Going by Drew Pavlou’s logic Steve Jobs must be a complete dumbass because he believed in homeopathic pseudoscience instead of doing chemotherapy.
 
Last edited:

Michaelsinodef

Senior Member
Registered Member
Fair, but a pitiful salary should not be used as an excuse for rape. The IDF is filled with bad people, plain and simple. My point is that most poor people don't rape their colleagues.
Oh, the salary is likely not the core reason for rape and sexual misconduct in IDF, but it very much doesn't help and is a source of a lot of problems when it comes to the IDF (some of these problems might also result in sexual misconduct).
 

ficker22

Senior Member
Registered Member
Oh, the salary is likely not the core reason for rape and sexual misconduct in IDF, but it very much doesn't help and is a source of a lot of problems when it comes to the IDF (some of these problems might also result in sexual misconduct).
Average Judeo-Christian value moment:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
The west seems to really have a lot of doublethink these days. Guess 1984 was a reflection of themselves.

You know how they try to say both sides are bad when you call them out on hypocrisy? They can't actually do that and doublethink is a result of it.

I thought this was common knowledge? George Orwell was a British Wartime propagandist who worked for the BBC and wrote 1984 largely based on his own experiences, with some embellishments and humour and projecting trends into the future of course.

But it was very much intended as a cautionary tale of what might happen if the people don’t wake up. I guess it’s ironically fitting that its true message is ignored by the western masses while the elites took it as a how-to guide.
 

supersnoop

Colonel
Registered Member
Didn't the West claim that protests are illegal in China and any protestors found will be pancaked by a Type 59 tank?

View attachment 125630
They also say news is heavily censored and access is tightly controlled, yet western news media is always able to somehow get the "true story" out of China. It's amazing that western journalists are all basically James Bonds.

As you note, there the news is reporting an imminent economic collapse in China, low consumer confidence is often cited as a factor
Another story:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
“I’ve been in China for 27 years, and this is probably the lowest confidence I’ve ever seen,” Shaun Rein, founder of the China Market Research Group, told CNBC Monday.

Yet why are we not hearing about the imminent collapse of the USA?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
45% rate economy as poor; 63% say it is getting worse, not better

Or Canada?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Or EU?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I guess this is proof that CCP is losing the grip on controlling people's minds and making them believe everything is fine even in spite of a gloomy global outlook
 

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member
I guess it’s ironically fitting that its true message is ignored by the western masses while the elites took it as a how-to guide.
Orwell's literature has always been elite-worshiping, proletariat-demeaning, anti-communist propaganda.
Orwell spends the entire book describing generations of animals as easily confused, dumb, stupid, illiterate, amnesiac… the entire book!
The main target of this book’s critique is the working class.
George Orwell writes from an aristocratic ethos. “Elite theory” posits the people as incapable of self-governance
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

British nuclear sub missile launch fails as Trident misfires and ‘plops’ into sea just yards away – with Defence Secretary Shapps on board​

A TRIDENT missile dramatically misfired and crashed into the ocean yards from the British nuclear submarine that launched it, The Sun can reveal.

The second failed launch in a row – after a misfire in 2016 – happened while Defence Secretary Grant Shapps was on board HMS Vanguard to witness the test.

HMS Vanguard was under the surface, hovering at launch depth, but was not hit by the 44ft missile as it plunged back into the Atlantic.

Immediately, a frantic probe began to find out what went wrong and a search ordered to recover the top-secret missile technology from the seabed at Port Canaveral, Florida.

It is the second failed test since 2016, when a Trident fired from HMS Vengeance veered off course and self-destructed.

But, despite the setback, officials insist they are confident that the misfire was “event specific”.

Crucially, it is understood that had the firing taken place on a real patrol mission rather than under test conditions it would have been successful.

No further details are being made public about what went wrong on the grounds of “national security”.

Did Downing Street hide Trident missile test failure just weeks before MPs voted?
In a statement issued to The Sun, the Ministry of Defence said: “HMS Vanguard and her crew have been proven fully capable of operating the UK’s Continuous At-Sea Deterrent, passing all tests during a recent demonstration and shakedown operation (DASO) - a routine test to confirm that the submarine can return to service following deep maintenance work.

“The test has reaffirmed the effectiveness of the UK’s nuclear deterrent, in which we have absolute confidence. During the test an anomaly occurred.

As a matter of national security, we cannot provide further information on this, however we are confident that the anomaly was event specific, and therefore there are no implications for the reliability of the wider Trident missile systems and stockpile.

“The UK’s nuclear deterrent remains safe, secure and effective.”
The Ministry of Defence confirmed an “anomaly occurred” during the January 30 exercise off Florida, but the nuclear deterrent remains “effective".

The crew on the nuclear sub perfectly completed their doomsday drill, and the Trident 2 missile was propelled into the air by compressed gas in the launch tube.

But its first stage boosters did not ignite and the 58-ton missile – fitted with dummy warheads – splashed into the ocean and sank.

A source said: “It left the submarine but it just went plop, right next to them.”

Ministers are expected to update MPs today in the Commons on the January 30 incident at the US’s secure Navy Port site. First Sea Lord Admiral Sir Ben Key was also onboard the sub at the time.

Officials stress Trident remains one of the most reliable weapons systems in the world, having successfully completed more than 190 tests involving the UK and US.

The UK has fired 12 Trident 2 missiles since the weapons entered service with the Royal Navy in 1994. But the two most recent ones failed.

In June 2016 a Trident 2 blasted out of HMS Vengeance and its rocket boosters successfully ignited. But moments later it veered off course, reportedly towards the US, and automatically self-destructed.

Later, Theresa May’s government was accused of covering up the failed launch as parliament was due to vote on renewing the UK’s nuclear deterrent.

MPs backed a plan overwhelmingly to spend £40billion on “upgrading the nuclear deterrent”.

It means the ageing fleet of Vanguard subs are due to be replaced with Dreadnought-class successors in the 2030s.

The Trident fired from HMS Vanguard was due to fly 3,700 miles from off the coast of Florida to an impact point in the mid-Atlantic between Braziland West Africa.

Its intended route was revealed in warning to ships and aircraft from National Geo Spatial Intelligence Agency.

The target was 1,000 miles closer than that of the failed 2016 launch and less than half the Trident 2 missile’s reported range of 7,500 miles.

Trident 2 missiles are designed to blast to the edge of space, reaching speeds of 13,600mph, before re-entering the earth’s atmosphere with a devastating payload of up to 12 nuclear warheads.

They first entered service with the US navy 34 years ago and four years later with the Royal Navy.

Yet the missile’s makers Lockheed Martin insist Trident 2s remain “the most advanced ballistic missiles in the world”.

It said they have been successfully test-fired a “record” 191 times since 1989, most recently in September when the USS Louisiana, an Ohio-class nuclear-powered sub, conducted a demonstration and shakedown operation in the Pacific.

British launches are rarer because each missile costs upwards of £17million.

Sounds like they should investigate those hot teapots.
 
Top