Strange choice to mount them there. They block the most common locations for mounting ERA.VT-5 light tank with additional sensors (cameras?) installed in turret corners and new cameras on the glacis plate.
Strange choice to mount them there. They block the most common locations for mounting ERA.VT-5 light tank with additional sensors (cameras?) installed in turret corners and new cameras on the glacis plate.
VT-5 light tank with additional sensors (cameras?) installed in turret corners and new cameras on the glacis plate.
Only some prototype have hydropneumatic suspension, production models have semi-active suspension made up of torsion bar plus lever type hydraulic shock absorbers. The hydraulic shock absorbers damping factor is dynamically adjusted in real time according to surface conditions.Hello! I am new here. I was always interested regarding the Type 15 LT and was wondering if someone could confirm whether the tank does have active hydropneumatic suspension (means it can vary it's hull pitch and ground clearance). Sadly I couldn't find any video of the tank demonstrating this ability. Anyone?
Only some prototype have hydropneumatic suspension, production models have semi-active suspension made up of torsion bar plus lever type hydraulic shock absorbers.
Does that mean the production Type 15 can still pivot forwards/backwards when the crew wants like the Type 10 and K2?Only some prototype have hydropneumatic suspension, production models have semi-active suspension made up of torsion bar plus lever type hydraulic shock absorbers. The hydraulic shock absorbers damping factor is dynamically adjusted in real time according to surface conditions.
Well it's really simple, Type 15 is the newest tank and uses bustle autoloader which allows blast wall and blow out panel, and indeed it has them. Type-99 and Type-96 family are older and use carousel autoloader where it's non-applicable.Thank you!
Btw while you are at it, just one more thing, do the Chinese LTs such as the VT-5/Type-15 have their bustle-rack-autoloaders reinforced with blow out panels for protection?
Why don't just adopt the same much safer ammo storage configuration for the mainstay Chinese MBT fleets as well, if true?