Zhuhai Air Show 2018

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
YJ-6 is a cargo submunitions weapon and doesn't really carry an unitary warhead. But yeah I meant to say "1000 kg class unitary bomb".
I wasn't trying to "correct" you, only to point out YJ-6 was on the side of PAF JF-17 with their color.:)
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
YJ-6 = CS/BBC5 500kg Satellite-Guided Glider Cargo Aerial Bomb

View attachment 49668
View attachment 49669

This seems to be reasonably advanced. Kind of like the Storm Shadow or the TAURUS KEPD 350. Should be a nice addition to their arsenal. With bomblets it could be used to destroy airfields at standoff ranges. With other kinds of warheads it could be used against bunkers or hardened concrete structures.

I do think the Chinese lack something like the Brimstone or the Hellfire on their fighter-bomber aircraft though. These would be useful in counter-insurgency warfare or against armor.
The USA also has been switching their attack helicopters to have laser guided rockets. This is another technology I have not seen in Chinese use yet.
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
@Deino, please check out this booth for us.

45682642631_6245099668_o.jpg

44768360705_fba3053916_o.jpg

This 'Tengyun' smells of pure vapor. I have seen similar proposals decades ago. Like the German Saenger II.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The Soviets also had similar proposals at one point.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Good luck making engines and an aircraft that wouldn't melt at those airspeeds. This is one of those projects which can easily ruin an economy. The Soviets made Buran for example and a fat load of good it did to them.
 
Last edited:

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
That looks like a mockup of the real deal. It looks like either a flying wing or blended wing-body shape.
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Yeah it makes sense. But it could have fooled me with all those serrated panels and attention to low-radar visibility. The front landing gear wheel is too large though.
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
This is a tube traveling vehicle I assume? There were plans for these things in several countries at one point but the expense of making the tunnels and maintaining a vacuum to travel at that speed was considered anti-economic at the time. Today you see people like Elon Musk proposing things like the Hyperloop which has much the same issues though. 1000 kph is basically supersonic speed so all the proposals that I can remember for that basically used a lower air pressure or vacuum because of that.

If you look at the Japanese SCMaglev which is a practical design which is supposed to reach production it is still hideously expensive even though it travels at a much lower speed.
 
Top