Z-20 (all variants) thread

[Blitzo]

So once again Z-20 is still inconclusive …

It is absolutely conclusive... 5 rotor blades instead of 4, different rear landing gear, are the tell tale differences.
The picture is just to show how similar the other parts are, but this is without doubt a Z-20.

 

[janker]

CG?

 

[cn_habs]

CG?

Without a doubt.

 

[A.Man]

Haha, Father and Uncle?

 

[superdog]

Without a doubt.

What tells you that it is CG without a doubt?

 

[MwRYum]

There has been doubts that it was a genuine Z-20 picture, and won't be long before somebody digs up a UH-60 pic that was used in this PS job.

 

[Jovian]

If that is a CG, it is a very nice CG.

 

[Totoro]

this image goes beyond PS, for it to be fake at least parts of it need to be actual 3d CG model. There are parts of the aircraft shown here in way better resolution than ever before, which differ sufficiently from uh60 that they need to be modelled, not just composited out of existing images. At the very least, one would need to literally hand draw those parts. If it is a fake - give that person a job in image manipulation/3d modelling.

 

[MwRYum]

this image goes beyond PS, for it to be fake at least parts of it need to be actual 3d CG model. There are parts of the aircraft shown here in way better resolution than ever before, which differ sufficiently from uh60 that they need to be modelled, not just composited out of existing images. At the very least, one would need to literally hand draw those parts. If it is a fake - give that person a job in image manipulation/3d modelling.

Just in case you don't know that there're those in China who're really good at this thing...

 

[Benefactor]

Without a doubt.

Well you are wrong. It is a legit. Here is another image