Aaron Amick is an American ex-sonar man running his own YouTube channel. In this video he gives a US perspective into the Yuan subs which he considers as “China’s most deadly ASW platform”. At 4.45, he talks about China’s SOSUS program.
Yeah I shared this earlier in the ASW thread. However, somewhere buried deep in the comments is my reply, which is that PLAN's subs are probably not going to be used for ASW missions. PLAN does have strong ASW capabilities, but that lies in the Type 56A corvettes and 54A frigates - these carry more sonars than all of the Tico cruisers and most of the Arleigh Burkes.
Aaron Amick is usually quite balanced, although his chat and commenters can be quite ideological and often uninformed. Someone was arguing that Russia's Zircon hypersonic missiles were "not as good as cruise missiles". I don't think it ever occured to them that the Zircon is a cruise missile... or what the difference between ballistic and cruise missiles are.
Why wont PLAN subs be used for ASW? I just assumed they would be part of any surface group.Yeah I shared this earlier in the ASW thread. However, somewhere buried deep in the comments is my reply, which is that PLAN's subs are probably not going to be used for ASW missions. PLAN does have strong ASW capabilities, but that lies in the Type 56A corvettes and 54A frigates - these carry more sonars than all of the Tico cruisers and most of the Arleigh Burkes.
Aaron Amick is usually quite balanced, although his chat and commenters can be quite ideological and often uninformed. Someone was arguing that Russia's Zircon hypersonic missiles were "not as good as cruise missiles". I don't think it ever occured to them that the Zircon is a cruise missile... or what the difference between ballistic and cruise missiles are.
They could, but it would be more situational. The diesel AIP subs are quiet enough, but they don't have the speed or the range, so might be more suited for coastal ASW. The US subs are generally regarded as very quiet, and far quieter than the PLAN nuclear subs, so one might need more usage of active sonars, which surface and air assets are more suitable for. Unless they keep bumping into undersea mountains.Why wont PLAN subs be used for ASW? I just assumed they would be part of any surface group.
Right, earlier this year a Type 054A and 2 Type 056A’s were in the Philippine Sea, I feel that a sub working in that group would be very effective, especially in an ambush situation.They could, but it would be more situational. The diesel AIP subs are quiet enough, but they don't have the speed or the range, so might be more suited for coastal ASW. The US subs are generally regarded as very quiet, and far quieter than the PLAN nuclear subs, so one might need more usage of active sonars, which surface and air assets are more suitable for. Unless they keep bumping into undersea mountains.
Yeah I shared this earlier in the ASW thread. However, somewhere buried deep in the comments is my reply, which is that PLAN's subs are probably not going to be used for ASW missions. PLAN does have strong ASW capabilities, but that lies in the Type 56A corvettes and 54A frigates - these carry more sonars than all of the Tico cruisers and most of the Arleigh Burkes.
Aaron Amick is usually quite balanced, although his chat and commenters can be quite ideological and often uninformed. Someone was arguing that Russia's Zircon hypersonic missiles were "not as good as cruise missiles". I don't think it ever occured to them that the Zircon is a cruise missile... or what the difference between ballistic and cruise missiles are.
Yeah I shared this earlier in the ASW thread. However, somewhere buried deep in the comments is my reply, which is that PLAN's subs are probably not going to be used for ASW missions. PLAN does have strong ASW capabilities, but that lies in the Type 56A corvettes and 54A frigates - these carry more sonars than all of the Tico cruisers and most of the Arleigh Burkes.
Aaron Amick is usually quite balanced, although his chat and commenters can be quite ideological and often uninformed. Someone was arguing that Russia's Zircon hypersonic missiles were "not as good as cruise missiles". I don't think it ever occured to them that the Zircon is a cruise missile... or what the difference between ballistic and cruise missiles are.