World News Thread & Breaking News!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Depending on where you are in London, putting big flower pots outside might instead create an effective open air lavatory for passing drunks or yobs.

To be honest, I would rather a homeless person slept in a doorway rather than said doorway becoming a public urinal. But to each their own I guess.
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
Depending on where you are in London, putting big flower pots outside might instead create an effective open air lavatory for passing drunks or yobs.

To be honest, I would rather a homeless person slept in a doorway rather than said doorway becoming a public urinal. But to each their own I guess.

Wuss! I would just put a couple of these on the area with laser trip wires.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


ok ok ok.. they could've easily put a BIG TALL giant flower pot or plant or one of those huge statues! If each apartment unit cost 800K pounds I'm sure they can afford to put something big, heavy and nice there to prevent vagrants or homeless people sleeping instead of the ugly spikes.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Down Kwa... Really the best answer is have for it is not spikes but a building manager and a phone. The individuals doing this are trespassing and a potential danger to the building residence. In my building when I spot a sleeper I call the manager and he Shows with this phone and the local Police number on Speed dial. the Guy either clears out or gets a nice place to Sleep at the local lockup.

Humorously a few years back on a really cold night a Store down the way had it's window smashed. When the Cops Showed they found the Suspect eager to cooperate in hopes of a place to crash the night.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
Putting planting pots as public urination would also attracts the flies and not to mention the awful stench. Doesn't London has some kind of homeless shelter, like here in Houston? But of course they still out there roaming the streets.
 

no_name

Colonel
I think, just build some semi-stands or building husks at some designated area and maybe they will flock there.

Sometimes I think these guys don't like shelters especially built for them, and feel more at home if they sleep at some grey or borderline legal place.

So why not build homeless shelters disguised as run-down buildings or temporary shades? Of course the government being all very serious and uptight organisations, will unlikely to take this advice.
 

texx1

Junior Member
I think, just build some semi-stands or building husks at some designated area and maybe they will flock there.

Sometimes I think these guys don't like shelters especially built for them, and feel more at home if they sleep at some grey or borderline legal place.

I volunteered at homeless shelters before. From what I could gather from the staff, a large portion of homeless people have some form of mental illness so they don't like to be stuck with strangers in an enclosed space. Some others are afraid of what little possessions they have might be stolen by others in the shelter. So homeless shelters are usually not full unless the weather is freezing outside.
 

texx1

Junior Member
After being cheeky with radiation level in the aftermath of Fukushima, Japanese government is now being cheeky with its nuclear fuel.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Japan failed to report 640 kg of nuclear fuel to IAEA

Japan failed to include 640 kg of unused plutonium in its annual reports to the International Atomic Energy Agency in 2012 and 2013, in what experts are terming an “inappropriate omission.”

The stock is part of mixed plutonium-uranium oxide (MOX) fuel stored in a reactor that was offline during this period, and was thus deemed exempt from IAEA reporting requirements, said an official at the Japan Atomic Energy Commission.

Experts warn that Japan’s reporting does not reflect the actual state of unused plutonium that could be diverted for nuclear weapons. The unreported amount is enough to make about 80 nuclear bombs.

The official said, “There is also no problem in terms of security against nuclear terrorism.”

“From the safeguards point of view, this material is still unirradiated fresh MOX fuel regardless of its location,” former IAEA Deputy Director General Olli Heinonen said. “If it has indeed not been irradiated, this should be reflected in the statements.”

In March 2011, the MOX fuel was loaded into the No. 3 reactor of Kyushu Electric Power Co.’s Genkai nuclear plant in Saga Prefecture during a regular checkup. It was removed two years later because the reactor has remained idled since the Fukushima nuclear crisis.

When Japan reported to the IAEA in 2012 that it had 1.6 tons of unused plutonium at reactors nationwide as of the end of 2011, down from 2.2 tons the previous year, it excluded the 640 kg. The amount reported a year later remained at 1.6 tons.

The fuel has been kept unused in a fuel pool since March 2013.

Japan is subject to rigorous international monitoring, as it possesses the largest amount of plutonium among nonnuclear weaponized nations, with more than 44 tons extracted from spent fuel and reprocessed for reuse under its nuclear fuel cycle policy.

The unreported plutonium was first reported by Kakujoho, a nuclear information website headed by nuclear policy analyst Masafumi Takubo.

Tatsujiro Suzuki, former vice chairman of the Japan Atomic Energy Commission and a professor at Nagasaki University, said the commission had overlooked the matter and therefore “should make efforts to improve” its reporting.
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


As America's war in Afghanistan winds down, the tools used to fight the battle are popping up in towns and cities across the country.

As the New York Times reports:

During the Obama administration, according to Pentagon data, police departments have received tens of thousands of machine guns; nearly 200,000 ammunition magazines; thousands of pieces of camouflage and night-vision equipment; and hundreds of silencers, armored cars and aircraft.
The Times cites the example of Neenah, Wisconsin, "a quiet city of about 25,000 people," with a low violent crime rate that "has not had a homicide in more than five years."

Nevertheless, the town just acquired a 9-foot-tall, 30-ton armored vehicle built to withstand land mines.

The militarization of police is not new and neither, critics say, are its results.

Kara Dansky, senior counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, previously told The Huffington Post that military weaponry and tactics have spread throughout the United States and now, SWAT teams are being called in for low-level drug arrests.

Just last month, a stun grenade blew up in a toddler's crib, badly injuring the child during a SWAT raid to capture a suspected meth seller. The suspect was not at the residence.

"SWAT teams were created in the 1960s for a very specific set of scenarios like hostage taking, active shooter scenes and true emergencies," Dansky said. "We're seeing increasingly that police are using SWAT teams to do raids of people's homes often in low-level drug cases. This sometimes causes an escalated risk of violence."

Neenah's police chief, Kevin E. Wilkinson, told the Times that law enforcement needs military equipment to handle their new, more active role in crisis like school shootings.

"I don’t like it. I wish it were the way it was when I was a kid,” Wilkinson said. “We’re not going to go out there as Officer Friendly with no body armor and just a handgun and say ‘Good enough.’ ”

But other members of law enforcement, like retired NYPD Det. John Baeza, disagree:

A profession that I was once proud to serve in has become a militarized police state. Officers are quicker to draw their guns and use their tanks than to communicate with people to diffuse a situation. They love to use their toys and when they do, people die.
The days of the peace officer are long gone, replaced by the militarized police warrior wearing uniforms making them indistinguishable from military personnel.

......... and the militarization of America's finest continues. A cop is a cop or should NEVER be a soldier wannabe!

If things gets dicey then that's what units like SWAT is for but it seems like nowadays almost every cop is armed and dressed like his SWAT counterpart.

pULY1wp.jpg
 

SampanViking

The Capitalist
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!




......... and the militarization of America's finest continues. A cop is a cop or should NEVER be a soldier wannabe!

If things gets dicey then that's what units like SWAT is for but it seems like nowadays almost every cop is armed and dressed like his SWAT counterpart.

pULY1wp.jpg

I think this is a very important story and not one to be derailed by the usual false flag conspiracy theories. This is not a story about the birth of a Police State, but allegedly, of rampant corruption in which major unidentified establishment figures are authorising the sale of military standard equipment to ordinary law enforcement from public funds and doing so for personal profit.

This is not the only part of the story, but part of a pattern in which public funds are being used to equip and maintain private security organisations, owned of course by the same individuals.

This is a story of the worst type of gravy train/pork barrel politics, that it is possible to imagine. This is a story of the elite saving themselves and letting the devil take the hindmost, milking the public purse for all it is worth, while it still can be milked.

Allegedly of course
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
I think this is a very important story and not one to be derailed by the usual false flag conspiracy theories. This is not a story about the birth of a Police State, but allegedly, of rampant corruption in which major unidentified establishment figures are authorising the sale of military standard equipment to ordinary law enforcement from public funds and doing so for personal profit.

This is not the only part of the story, but part of a pattern in which public funds are being used to equip and maintain private security organisations, owned of course by the same individuals.

This is a story of the worst type of gravy train/pork barrel politics, that it is possible to imagine. This is a story of the elite saving themselves and letting the devil take the hindmost, milking the public purse for all it is worth, while it still can be milked.

Allegedly of course

of course! Someone is getting very rich off of these so call transfer of assets from military to civilian however all conspiracy theories aside let's also not discount the fact that the cops in this country has become much more militarized then their counterparts 30, 40 years ago.
It's extremely difficulty to find the likes of Andy Taylor or Barney Fife in America's police force today. Even though they were fictional characters but cops like them actually do exist back in the day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top