What the Heck?! Thread (Closed)

Status
Not open for further replies.

broadsword

Brigadier
Their current method of deterrent I believe is to bulldoze the bombers' houses. I thought it was drastic enough, that's why there are not many cases of suicide bombings in Israel.
 

delft

Brigadier
I found this horrifying commentary in The Washington Post:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Post's View

Police rake in bonanzas from people who have committed no crime


By Editorial Board September 10 at 8:32 PM

THE POLICE can take your car and everything in it — including the cash you are transporting to buy a used truck, a fixer-upper house or equipment for your restaurant — even if you’re not guilty of any crime. Getting your property back can take months and cost thousands. Sometimes authorities will offer to give those who complain half their money back, which makes little sense if the cash is free from association with a serious crime — or if it isn’t.

If all of that seems like it couldn’t possibly happen in the United States, welcome to the weird legal backroads of civil forfeiture. A Post three-part investigation this week showed that law enforcement officers deploy this extraordinary power across the country, too often against innocent people, with the assistance and encouragement of the federal government.

Civil forfeiture policies are in place to combat drug rings and other organized crime. If law enforcement officials believe that property — cars, homes or, especially, cash — is connected to criminal activity, they can take it. But officers’ pretexts can be shockingly thin: cars that have tinted windows, cars that are too clean, cars that are too dirty, drivers who are too nervous, the presence of energy drinks and so forth. Rightful owners have to hire lawyers and prove that the cash came from legitimate savings and not from a drug smuggler. That takes time and often comes in the form of a settlement in which victims must promise not to sue.

Local police departments have discovered that they can claim revenue and glory by seizing large amounts of property from motorists. Unsurprisingly, reporters have been turning up anecdotal accounts of police abuse. The New Yorker last year detailed how overzealous officials in Tenaha, Tex., shook down out-of-state drivers by, among other things, threatening to take their children away from them, then funneled the confiscated cash into officer bonuses and popcorn machines.

Though state laws sanction much of this, the federal government helped create a nationwide forfeiture bonanza. If a local police department confiscates property on behalf of the feds, it gets a large slice of the value back through a program known as “equitable sharing.” The Post’s Robert O’Harrow Jr., Michael Sallah and Steven Rich found that, through the program, authorities have made 61,998 cash seizures without search warrants or indictments since 9/11. They raked in $2.5 billion, in large part through confiscating relatively small amounts.

“Hundreds of state and local departments and drug task forces appear to rely on seized cash, despite a federal ban on [using] the money to pay salaries or otherwise support budgets,” The Post reported, adding that “298 departments and 210 task forces have seized the equivalent of 20 percent or more of their annual budgets since 2008.”

Congress and state governments should demand that confiscated money not be used to fund police operations, and they should develop policies to limit the application of civil forfeiture to the kingpins it was supposed to target.
 

delft

Brigadier
I happened to see this one on RT.com and I like the matter of the ( for a naval vessel pretty cheap ) patrol boats for the Afghan navy:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

US planes worth $500mn sold for scrap in Afghanistan – for just $32,000
Published time: October 10, 2014 09:51


A US watchdog is asking why 16 planes bought for the Afghan Air Force, costing almost $500 million, were turned into scrap metal valued at just $32,000. The government wants to know why hundreds of millions of taxpayers’ money were wasted on the project.

The military transport planes had been sitting at Kabul International Airport for years, before they were sent for scrap. John Sopko, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), wants to know why the money was wasted. According to Reuters, he had asked Air Force Secretary Deborah James to keep a record of all decisions concerning the destruction of the 16 C-27J planes.

Sopko also wants to know what will happen to another four transport planes currently stored at the US Air Force base in Ramstein, Germany.

"I am concerned that the officials responsible for planning and executing the scrapping of the planes may not have considered other possible alternatives in order to salvage taxpayer dollars," Sopko said.

The 20 planes were bought from Alenia, which is part of the Italian aircraft company Fimmeccanica SpA. However, according to a SIGAR letter sent to US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, the program was ended in March 2013, “after sustained, serious performance, maintenance, and spare parts problems and the planes were grounded,” ABC reported.

By January 2013, according to Sopko’s office, the aircraft were not airworthy and had only flown a total of 234 of the 4,500 hours required in nine months from January through September 2012. Spoko’s office also said that a further $200 million was needed to buy spare parts.

The Defense Logistics Agency was responsible for destroying the planes and Sopko now wants to know if any of the parts of the planes were sold before they were sent for scrap metal.

Major Bradlee Avots, a Pentagon spokesman, said that the 16 aircraft at Kabul International Airport had been destroyed “to minimize impact on drawdown of US Forces in Afghanistan,” and added that more information would be released after a review. The US government is currently in the process of scaling down from its present military personnel in Afghanistan of around 26,000 to a force of just under 10,000, who will be staying in a mainly advisory role.

Avots also said that the US Department of Defense and the US Air Force were still deciding what to do with the four aircraft in Germany.

SIGAR has been investigating possible wasteful spending on warplanes since the end of 2013, following questions raised by military officials and non-profit organizations.

Sopko has said that he does not know if wasteful plane procurement was due to any criminal malice or was just mismanagement, but that the “scrap metal” incident in Afghanistan was not an isolated case.

In June, despite Afghanistan being a landlocked country, a US government watchdog found that the Pentagon spent more than $3 million obtaining eight patrol boats that were never used. Additionally, the cost of each boat turned out to be about $375,000 – far more than the $50,000 they usually sell for in the US.

During his investigation, Sopko said that records related to the purchase and cancelation of the patrol boats were severely lacking, and his questions to the military have not resulted in adequate answers.

“The military has been unable to provide records that would answer the most basic questions surrounding this $3 million purchase,” his office told the Washington Post in a statement in June.
Seriously I suppose the patrol boats were intended for use on rivers in Helmand and along the Northern border.
 

ABC78

Junior Member
I was searching for news on ww2 video games using Chinese forces and found this article and I was like WTF.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Sh*tstorm incoming: Japanese mobile game blames China for World War II

C. Custer | April 16, 2014

Well, this is likely to cause a bit of a fuss: the latest mobile iteration of Japanese developer Systemsoft Alpha’s Daisenryaku series will be hitting smartphones this summer, but some of its promotional materials have already hit the web, and Chinese gamers are not amused.

The strategy game allows players to take the reigns in some of the great Asian conflicts of the 20th century, and while gameplay depends on player decisions and is thus pretty ahistorical, the game’s promotional materials do include some historical background, including this sentence about what kicked off Japan’s invasion of China proper in 1937:

In 1937, Japanese troops drilling near the Longwang Temple were shelled by Chinese forces, and Chinese soldiers [stationed there] met [the Japanese army] head on; history calls this the Marco Polo Bridge Incident.

This description, as Chinese gaming sites like Netease have pointed out, implies that Chinese aggression caused the incident and that Chinese forces provoked Japan into invading China proper.
 

solarz

Brigadier
Air umbrella. I have no comment.

[video=youtube;K6eyND08tu0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6eyND08tu0[/video]

Maximum battery life of 30 minutes? I'm going to assume that is under optimal conditions, just after being fully charged.

It wouldn't be very useful if your "umbrella" suddenly vanished in the middle of the rain. Furthermore, it likely doesn't last anywhere near that long under heavy downpour conditions.

It also looks to be rather bulky. A lithium battery of that size has to be pretty heavy!
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
That's just so vulgar and shameless, but yet you can see that they are too ashamed of their past.

The more they try to distort the historical facts the more stupid they look. It's another pie in the face.

Maximum battery life of 30 minutes? I'm going to assume that is under optimal conditions, just after being fully charged.

It wouldn't be very useful if your "umbrella" suddenly vanished in the middle of the rain. Furthermore, it likely doesn't last anywhere near that long under heavy downpour conditions.

It also looks to be rather bulky. A lithium battery of that size has to be pretty heavy!

Maybe it was meant for short distance and quick use to get to your car or taxi cab in the rain.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
LOL...just in time for Halloween, check out my new pet...ahem...."puppy"!;):p

Piotr Naskrecki was taking a nighttime walk in a rainforest in Guyana, when he heard rustling as if something were creeping underfoot. When he turned on his flashlight, he expected to see a small mammal, such as a possum or a rat.

"When I turned on the light, I couldn't quite understand what I was seeing," said Naskrecki, an entomologist and photographer at Harvard University's Museum of Comparative Zoology.

A moment later, he realized he was looking not at a brown, furry mammal, but an enormous, puppy-size spider....
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


theraphosa4.jpg1413584886
 

SteelBird

Colonel
Maybe it was meant for short distance and quick use to get to your car or taxi cab in the rain.

I like this idea. You know when you hold an umbrella and get into a car, a normal umbrella become very disturbing but an air-umbrella is not all. However, I think this air-umbrella is under development stage only.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top