Aerodriver said:Extracts from a paper From Enviromental Health Perspectives.
Anyone REALLY interested in reading the full report can find it at
China's extraordinary economic growth, industrialization, and urbanization, coupled with inadequate investment in basic water supply and treatment infrastructure, have resulted in widespread water pollution. In China today approximately 700 million people--over half the population--consume drinking water contaminated with levels of animal and human excreta that exceed maximum permissible levels by as much as 86% in rural areas and 28% in urban areas.
As of 1996, only 5% of municipal wastewater and 17% of industrial discharge received any treatment before being discharged into lakes, rivers, irrigation ditches, or the coastal waters
10 major polluting sectors of Chinese TVIEs in Beijing, Liaoning, Jiangsu, Shandong, Guizhou, Guangdong, and Hubei. Organic matter, acids, alkalis, nitrogen, phosphate, phenols, cyanide, lead, cadmium, mercury, and bichromate were among the major water pollutants found in the bodies of water near rural residential areas and their drinking water systems. Monitoring results showed that all the major pollutants analyzed exceeded national standards for drinking water quality. Mercury concentrations were 45-700% in excess of the standard, whereas concentrations of lead were 3,600-5,216% greater than the standard.
In a number of studies, pollutants released by TVIEs have been linked to adverse health effects. In China overall, liver and stomach cancer deaths have doubled since the 1970s, and are now the leading causes of cancer mortality in rural China (9). China now has the highest liver cancer death rate in the world
END of extracts
Offical gouvement figures from the Conference on Water Quality and Arsenic Mitigation organized in Taiyuan, China, November 23-26 2004
(c) Observing that in the countries where arsenic in groundwater has been
demonstrated at least 50 million people are exposed to arsenic levels in water
exceeding 50 ug/L, and that the population exposed to arsenic concentrations
exceeding the WHO recommended guideline value for arsenic in drinking water of
10 ug/L is many times that;
(d) Adding furthermore that 200 million people are exposed to fluoride in
their drinking water in excess of recommended concentrations, while 790
million people rely on microbiologically unsafe drinking water sources;
(e) Understanding that in China and other parts of the region the unique
situation exists of exposure to arsenic through the burning of arseniferous
coal, in addition to the exposure through drinking water, and that through
this route at least a further 100,000 people are exposed;
(f) Concerned that the combined environmental exposure to date has led to
at least 200,000 people developing arsenicosis, a disease for which no cure
exists and which results in progressive loss of productivity through
disablement and finally death if exposure to arsenic through all pathways is
not mitigated;
Another article on water from 2005.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm, maybe I will drink more bottled water now
Azn boi said:Hi I am wondering if you drink any water from any city does it cause diareea?Also I'm wondering like that the gov't have new laws for coal factories to have new rules to reduce the pollution. Does the coal companies obey the laws if they don't does the gov't does anything to make them do it.
bd popeye said:Hey silverpike . Dude you are all right to answer those questions. I have been to Hong Kong 3 times while I was with the USN. I know Hong Kong does not count. My son has actually been to mainland China. In 2002. He was on the USS Paul F Foster DD-964 they went to Qingdao. And he and some of his shipmates took a tour of Beijing. He said it was the best cities he has ever been to...
Aerodriver said:I saw a short protest, about 3 months ago, at Tiananmen Square by a lone middle age man. It lasted about 30 seconds, he opened a banner, I did not have time to read it, and the police in uniform moved him on. There was a large crowd and the man struggled, a little, and said to the police are you not going to hit me, the police officer just smiled and said why would I do that. I was pleasantly suprised by the way they dealt with him, although if someone wants to protest about something there should be an area where he is allowed but I don't think the CCP will allow that any time soon. Anyway the police were very good in public view, not sure what happened out of view though.
Aerodriver said:In relation to the house buying, the house is always your property, but after a certain amount of time and it varies, the government gets the land back. Yes it’s a strange situation. Not sure what will happen in the future if the government tries to take the land back though.
Aerodriver said:The government does provide houses for people to buy if their income is under 60,000 rmb per year- lots of completion for these houses though.
Aerodriver said:Religion. as long the CCP says it is okay, its okay -it can change its mind. For example -Catholics, the head of the church is not the pope, it is the CCP. If your Catholic and have the pope as the head of the church you an underground religion. They are getting more strict on underground religions now.
To the member called FuManCh- I sited Fox as an example of a news service that does not get it right regarding China.
Also I was not born in China,I'm from europe. I just live here.
He made an eariler comment about porn and mentioned that Chinese parents generally do not discuss sex with their kids. In my opinion this would be a bad thing. Silverpike is there "Sex Education" in school in China?..Is this problem about teaching kids about sex a cultural thing? I know there are many parents worldwide(US also) that let the schools teach the kids about S-E-X....simply because they do not want to discuss it. Afterall somebody in China must know something about sex there are 1,300,000,000 Chinese! They all did not get there by magic!
Originally Posted by Azn boi
Hi I am wondering if you drink any water from any city does it cause diareea?Also I'm wondering like that the gov't have new laws for coal factories to have new rules to reduce the pollution. Does the coal companies obey the laws if they don't does the gov't does anything to make them do it.