US Navy DDG 1000 Zumwalt Class

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
From the US Navy regarding the USS Zumwalt's 1st Sea Trial:

“We plan on a 7-day underway period for the first builder’s sea trials to shake it down as extensively as possible. In December, if we’re ready with a notional start of the 7th of December,”

“That is the critical milestone in terms of being able to deliver in the spring. We need a successful trial. We’ll learn things from the trial, we always do. First-of-class, we expect to learn a lot."

Zumwalt-prep-trials.jpg

Folks, the 7th is this coming Monday. I hope they make that date. I am really excited to see this baby go to sea.
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
That is one good looking vessel and will ensure USN dominance for the forseeable future. I wish they build more of them but I do understand budget constraints!

Imagined 2 Zumwalts for every CSG provinding AAW screen on the battlespace and another pair of Zumwalts for each Naval ESG on outer screen and overland bombardment with rail guns and tomahawks.

If I'm POTUS I will cancel Burke and have a 36 ship run of the Zumwalt class. ;)
 

Brumby

Major
Imagined 2 Zumwalts for every CSG provinding AAW screen on the battlespace and another pair of Zumwalts for each Naval ESG on outer screen and overland bombardment with rail guns and tomahawks.
I understand the AN/SPY-3 Multi-Function Radar (MFR) on board the Zumwalt is geared towards AAW self defence and not area defence unlike the Burkes. In capabilities, how significant is this difference I do not have a clue as to how it might provide AAW screen.
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
I understand the AN/SPY-3 Multi-Function Radar (MFR) on board the Zumwalt is geared towards AAW self defence and not area defence unlike the Burkes. In capabilities, how significant is this difference I do not have a clue as to how it might provide AAW screen.

Impossible to ascertain by the public since it's classified however in it's current form i agree that it may not be as effective as a flt 3 burke for total flt defence but only because it was 'detooth' somewhat due to the introduction of the flt 3s and it was relegated to a more surface type warface but if it were to be use as an outer aaw screen I'm pretty sure together with the sbar it can easily be use for fleet air defence with minimal modifications to the radar system which would give it both volume and horizon search capabilities that would very likely surpass the aaw capabilities of the Burkes.

Apart from primary sensors, zumwalts has better integration and datalink capabilities with the fcs, open cic, ECM etc which gives it an advantage over the Burkes.

It would not take too much of a conversion to make it be better than burke even flt 3 in fleet air defence including the ability to carry sm6s.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
That is one good looking vessel and will ensure USN dominance for the forseeable future. I wish they build more of them but I do understand budget constraints!

Imagined 2 Zumwalts for every CSG provinding AAW screen on the battlespace and another pair of Zumwalts for each Naval ESG on outer screen and overland bombardment with rail guns and tomahawks.

If I'm POTUS I will cancel Burke and have a 36 ship run of the Zumwalt class. ;)
These were to be the DDG version. There were plans to design and build another CG version that would have been Tico-centric.

This vessel has the room for the larger radars if they wanted...and for the rail guns too. Lots of PVLS room as well.

If I am POTUS, I go ahead and build the first 8 Flight IIIs and then concurrently design the improved Zumwalt and then begin building 32 of them as the last 3-4 Flight IIIs are building.
 
...

Folks, the 7th is this coming Monday. I hope they make that date. I am really excited to see this baby go to sea.

I even checked the forecast:
P34gl.jpg

great weather, isn't it?

now I realized exactly 14 freaking years ago I had visited New Hampshire (Franconia Notch, Mt. Washington) and the weather was pretty much like that, which I appreciated a lot, since I didn't take winter clothes with me LOL
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Zumwalt-trial-01.jpg

CTVNews said:
BATH, Maine -- The largest destroyer ever built for the U.S. Navy headed out to sea for the first time Monday, departing from shipbuilder Bath Iron Works and carefully navigating the winding Kennebec River before reaching the open ocean where the ship will undergo sea trials.

More than 200 shipbuilders, sailors and residents gathered to watch as the futuristic 600-foot, 15,000-ton USS Zumwalt glided past Fort Popham, accompanied by tugboats.

Kelley Campana, a Bath Iron Works employee, said she had goose bumps and tears in her eyes.

"This is pretty exciting. It's a great day to be a shipbuilder and to be an American," she said. "It's the first in its class. There's never been anything like it. It looks like the future."

Larry Harris, a retired Raytheon employee who worked on the ship, watched it depart from Bath.

"It's as cool as can be. It's nice to see it underway," he said. "Hopefully, it will perform as advertised."

Bath Iron Works will be testing the ship's performance and making tweaks this winter. The goal is to deliver it to the Navy sometime next year.

"We are absolutely fired up to see Zumwalt get underway. For the crew and all those involved in designing, building, and readying this fantastic ship, this is a huge milestone," the ship's skipper, Navy Capt. James Kirk, said before the ship departed.

The ship has electric propulsion, new radar and sonar, powerful missiles and guns, and a stealthy design to reduce its radar signature. Advanced automation will allow the warship to operate with a much smaller crew size than current destroyers.

All of that innovation has led to construction delays and a growing price tag. The Zumwalt, the first of three ships in the class, will cost at least $4.4 billion.

The ship looks like nothing ever built at Bath Iron Works.

The inverse bow juts forward to slice through the waves. Sharp angles deflect enemy radar signals. Radar and antennas are hidden in a composite deckhouse.

The builder sea trials will answer any questions of seaworthiness for a ship that utilizes a type of hull associated with pre-dreadnought battleships from a century ago.

Critics say the "tumblehome" hull's sloping shape makes it less stable than conventional hulls, but it contributes to the ship's stealth and the Navy is confident in the design.

Eric Wertheim, author and editor of the U.S. Naval Institute's "Guide to Combat Fleets of the World," said there's no question the integration of so many new systems from the electric drive to the tumblehome hull carries some level of risk.

Operational concerns, growing costs and fleet makeup led the Navy to truncate the 32-ship program to three ships, he said. With only three ships, the class of destroyers could become something of a technology demonstration project, he said.

Here are some more pictures:

Zumwalt-trial-02.jpg

Zumwalt-trial-03.jpg

Zumwalt-trial-04.jpg

Zumwalt-trial-00.jpg

Beautiful vessel. she's going to be a keeper.
 
Last edited:

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Umm this ship looks ALIEN!! These pictures are crazy! Keep the pictures coming as they come in!
Very smooth lines. All the right angles. Nothing really protruding to bounce back radar...which is the idea. Even the AGS cupolas are all stealthier up...as you would expect.

I do notice that the two secondary guns...which supposedly now will be 30mm auto-cannons, are still not on the ship.

I hope to see them do some form of testing on the PVLS, and am anxious to see them in operation. Certainly no live firing this round of trials, but even seeing them operating open and closed would be nice.
 
Top