timepass
Brigadier
US Navy Ship Test Fires Harpoon Missile Near Guam Amid Threats From North Korea..
related:Apr 19, 2018and this is interesting:
Lack of funds causes USAF to skip hypersonic cruise missile competition
04 June, 2018
Insight into how urgently the U.S. Air Force wants to field a hypersonic strike weapon has emerged even as officially acknowledges the April award of a potential $928 million contract to develop the air-launched missile.
In a document justifying its decision to award a single contract to develop the Hypersonic Conventional Strike Weapon (HCSW) after only a limited competition, the Air Force says it plans to conduct the critical design review (CDR) just 24 months after contract award, at the end of fiscal 2019. Early operational capability of the Mach 5-plus missile on an existing fighter/bomber aircraft is scheduled for fiscal 2022.
The heavily redacted justification and approval document posted by the Air Force on June 4 also refers to a second hypersonic weapon, but the details have been removed. This is likely the Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon (ARRW), an air-launched boost-glide missile that Lockheed Martin is already developing under an extension to its contract to build the Tactical Boost Glide (TBG) demonstrator.
HCSW is a solid-rocket-powered, GPS-guided missile, where ARRW is a rocket-boosted unpowered hypersonic glider. The Air Force document says, “In order to keep pace with our adversaries’ technology efforts, [redacted] programs were directed to proceed quickly to CDR. [Redacted] HCSW is intended to provide an alternative solution with an overall schedule/technical risk by focusing on highly mature technologies.”
The justification document then goes on to say, “This will result in [redacted, but likely the ARRW] CDR scheduled for the beginning of FY19, with HCSW following by the end of FY19. Collectively, the efforts ensure a capability fielding in the early 2020s.”
Lockheed Martin’s Skunk Works is under contract to flight-test the 500-nm-range TBG demonstrator in 2019. The Skunk Works is also expected to flight-test Darpa’s scramjet-powered, 300-nm-plus Hypersonic Air-launched Weapon Concept (HAWC) missile demonstrator in 2019.
Because it is rocket-powered, HCSW presents lower technical and schedule challenges for accelerated fielding than the air-breathing HAWC, which is the follow-on to the Air Force Research Laboratory’s (AFRL) X-51A scramjet engine demonstrator that exceeded Mach 5 in a 2013 flight test.
But to meet the Air Force’s accelerated fielding date of fiscal 2022, the justification document reveals, Lockheed must complete component and subsystem testing of critical elements of the missile system in representative operational conditions before the CDR. These include guidance, navigation and control and thermal management.
The document says the Air Force received 12 responses to the HCSW request for information released in mid-2017, but judged only five of the bidders capable of developing the weapon: , Lockheed, , Orbital ATK and . The April contract award says only three bids were received.
The award is an indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract covering a 60-month engineering and manufacturing development (EMD) program. The justification document says the Air Force does not have the funding to carry two contractors through EMD, so IDIQ task orders will not be competed.
Announcing the April contract award in a June 6 release, Lockheed says it “is working closely with the Air Force to finalize system requirements under the contract’s initial task order. This is the first phase of a development program, with future phases progressing through design, flight test, initial production and deployment of the weapon system at early operational capability. The contract ceiling through early operational capability is $928 million.”
Lockheed Martin Space in Huntsville is the prime contractor. “Our goal is rapid development and fielding of the HCSW system, and this contract is the first step in achieving that goal,” John Snyder, vice president of Air Force strategic programs, says in a statement.
After dragging its heels for decades, the Pentagon has come under pressure to field hypersonic weapons quickly because of advances made by China and Russia, including the much-trumpeted initial deployment of Russia’s Kh-47M2 Kinzhal hypersonic strike missile on MiG-31s at the end of 2017.
While Darpa’s TBG technology demo is already moving forward into the ARRW missile program, the ultimate outcome of the HAWC demo is less clear. AFRL has an ongoing High-Speed Strike Weapon technology maturation program, for which industry days are planned on July 14-15 at Eglin AFB, Florida.
nowMay 19, 2018
and here's JSTARS related part of the most recent DefenseNews article
:
"The House bill would force the Pentagon to proceed with its JSTARS recapitalization plans the Air Force would like to abandon in favor of a new advanced battle management system. Even though the House and SASC would put restrictions on retiring the legacy JSTARS, the SASC bill would supporting the Air Force’s pursuit of advanced battle management systems by including funding to accelerate it.
The idea behind the ABMS is instead of having a commercial business jet-sized surveillance aircraft close to the battlefield ― where it is vulnerable to surface-to-air missiles ― troops would have a fused picture from the Air Force’s current inventory of aircraft and drones to do the ground surveillance mission.
Lawmakers in both chambers have expressed concerns that it will take so long accomplish that it’s unwise to scrap the existing program.
“There’s a recognition in the Senate bill that we don’t want to retire aircraft too quickly before a replacement capability arises such that we end up with a gap,” an SASC staffer said. “We do not direct them to proceed with the recap out of concerns with survivability, which we share with the department.”
Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson, in Senate testimony May 17, said that to operate both JSTARs and the ABMS, it would take a whopping $7 billion more than the Air Force’s budget proposal."
that oversee the Pentagon have hammered out their annual defense legislation, and it’s clear that there’s on whether to kill the Air Force’s JSTARS recap program.
The Air Force, in its fiscal year 2019 budget request, aimed to , which would replace the E-8C Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System aircraft with new planes.
Instead, the service planned to invest in a new Advanced Battle Management System concept — a series of targeted investments that would allow the Air Force to better network together its existing aircraft and drones to do the ground surveillance mission. It also wanted to retire three legacy E-8Cs.
While it’s obvious that all of the congressional defense committees disagree with aspects of the Air Force’s new strategy, it appears that a faceoff is coming between the House — which favors the JSTARS recap approach — and the Senate, which seems to be leaning in favor of cancelation.
Both House committees have thusfar included funding and language that would force the Air Force to award an engineering and manufacturing development contract to one of the three competitors in source selection for the program.
Meanwhile, the Senate Armed Services Committee would allow the Air Force to proceed with the JSTARS recap cancelation, and instead wants to pour money into ABMS to accelerate fielding. A Senate staffer told Defense News that it’s likely that Senate appropriators will follow suit when they release their version of the bill.
One reason that senators may be warming up to the prospect of a JSTARS recap cancelation is the Air Force’s decision, announced Wednesday, to base ABMS at Robins Air Force Base in Georgia, where the E-8C fleet is located.
Georgia’s congressional delegation had been staunch defenders of retaining the legacy JSTARS and of the JSTARS recap. But Rep. Austin Scott and Sens. Johnny Isakson and David Perdue hailed the decision to base ABMS at Robins in a joint statement.
And — importantly — the lawmakers acknowledged a transition from JSTARS to ABMS with no mention of the recap program.
“This decision by the U.S. Air Force underscores our ability to host critical strategic assets capable of impacting battlefields around the world,” said Isakson. “We welcome any and all new missions that the Air Force is willing to bring to Robins, and I will continue to work with the Air Force as the implementation of this plan proceeds.
Here’s how each of the congressional defense committees want to proceed.
House Appropriations
The House Appropriations Committee’s defense subcommittee put forward their version of .
While it’s unclear how much money is included for JSTARS recap in the bill, it’s clear that the intention is to move forward with the program.
“None of the funds made available by this or any other Act may be obligated or expended to divest more than one E-8C aircraft unless the Secretary of the Air Force certifies to the congressional defense committees that funds made available in this or any other Act have been obligated pursuant to the award of one or more contracts to continue the Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System recapitalization program,” the language states.
Or in short, the committee will be given funding to put JSTARS recap under contract. And until the Air Force does that, it won’t be able to retire as many E-8Cs as it wants.
This committee is especially important because it, along with the Senate Appropriations Committee, is responsible for determining how the Pentagon spends its money. By contrast, the Senate and House armed service committees’ defense authorization bill only provides spending recommendations.
Senate Armed Services Committee
Meanwhile, the SASC addresses the prospect of a capability gap differently. Rather than mandating JSTARS recap’s continuation, it increases funding to accelerate ABMS, adding $120 million to buy six more MQ-9 Reapers, a staffer said.
The Air Force envisions the Reaper as part of the ABMS network, and plans to upgrade a portion of the Reaper fleet with a miniaturized ground moving target indicator radar like the ones currently carried by JSTARS. Increasing the Air Force’s MQ-9 fleet will help ensure the service retains its capacity to accomplish the ABMS mission as well as the existing surveillance and strike duties carried out by the Reaper today, the staffer said..
To ensure that there’s no loss in capability while ABMS is stood up, it also invests in the legacy JSTARS aircraft. Language in SASC’s version of the NDAA prohibits the Air Force from retiring any E-8Cs unless its civilian head determines that those planes are no longer flyable due to mishaps, damage or because repairs have become uneconomical.
The committee adds $50 million to continue investing in the Northrop Grumman radar that was originally developed to go on new JSTARS planes. Air Force officials have said that radar could have other use cases across the fleet.
It also adds about $98 million for contractor logistics support, operations and maintenance needed to keep all of the E-8Cs flying.
House Armed Services Committee
HASC unequivocally , authorizing $623 million in its defense policy bill to carry on the program.
Its version of the bill also includes a provision that halves funding for the Advanced Battle Management System unless the Air Force gives a JSTARS recap contract to Northrop Grumman, or Boeing, which all remain in source selection.
Like the other defense committees, it also limits the number of E-8Cs the Air Force can divest, capping it at one aircraft.
HASC’s proposal would allow all of the stakeholders to have their cake and eat it too. The Air Force would be able to move on with ABMS, the JSTARS recap program would continue on, and additional E-8C aircraft would be retained in the meantime.
But all of that has a cost, Air Force leaders have warned.
Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson told the Senate on May 17 that it would cost an extra $7 billion over its current budget proposal to operate both JSTARS and ABMS.
From a survivability standpoint, the Air Force is right to want to invest in a more disaggregated battle management architecture like ABMS, said Richard Aboulafia, an aerospace analyst with the Teal Group.
But with all of the committees fearful of a capability gap, it’s very likely that the Air Force will have to field at least some JSTARS recap planes as an interim solution.
“What is the date that the network becomes truly effective? What’s the gap between E-8 retirement and that marvelous capability? And Congress is clearly signaling that it will be a longer than an acceptable gap,” Aboulafia said.
“Given that the Air Force occasionally gets beaten up for not supporting ground troops, they might want to give in on this.”
Spenser Rapone, 'Communism will win' officer, receives 'other than honorable' discharge: Report
washingtontimes•June 8, 2018
Spenser Rapone, 'Communism will win' officer, receives 'other than honorable' discharge: Report
West Point alumnus and Infantry Officer Spenser Rapone presents a “communism will win” sign while in uniform. Spenser Rapone, the former second lieutenant whose “Communism will win” photos went viral in 2017, has received an “other than honorable” discharge from the Army.
Yes sir, 'communism will win'. Interesting article and my hats off to Rapone brave stance to go against the grain in his beliefs as to many would unjustly label him as "traitor". Keep in mind he was an US Army Ranger and have served in Afghanistan as combat veteran before entering to West Point.
From what is written in the article, he sounds like someone looking to subvert our form of government for some communist revolution whatever that means in his brain. Basically wasnt true to his oath. Glad he's out.
But Washington times tends to have a right bias, so possible it is missing details.
Yes sir, 'communism will win'. Interesting article and my hats off to Rapone brave stance to go against the grain in his beliefs as to many would unjustly label him as "traitor". Keep in mind he was an US Army Ranger and have served in Afghanistan as combat veteran before entering to West Point.
Or perhaps he got tire of serving for an undeserved master that causes a lot of heartaches and headaches to Americans through the regime changing over the decade and he wants a change of scenery in government?