TerraN_EmpirE
Tyrant King
I apologize, I was Wrong With armor Kit the Stryker offers all around 14.5mm protection with 14.5mm frontal and 7.62x54mm all around. Still LAVIII was never intended to be a Heavy IFV but a fast to deploy APC much like the M113 and USMC LAV
These Vehicles by the Way would be totally unarmored intended instead to be transported in CH47 Chinook helicopters and Slung under UH60 Helicopters.
JLTV or L-ATV made by Oshkosh defence is a bit of a Hybrid. Protection of an MRAP, Terrain ability of a Humvee without straining to deal with bolt on armor. It's one of a number of vehicles that seem to be aimed to replace the Humvee and better fill the more modern mission needs of the US DOD
Congress directs Army to conduct light vehicle competition in FY18 spending bill
By: 5 hours ago
as part of its fiscal 2018 omnibus spending bill released March 21.
While the Army has maintained it is for the GMV, there have been murmurings the service might just decide to continue to buy the interim vehicle — General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems’ Flyer 72 — it had purchased for five airborne infantry brigade combat teams.
The congressional language locks the Army into its publicly declared plan.
Industry members were left scratching their heads when the Army decided to delay a competition and field an interim solution using Flyer 72 after spending years demonstrating and evaluating a variety of commercial off-the-shelf offerings.
The pool of readily available ultralight vehicles is deep. In addition to GD’s Flyer, the Boeing-MSI Defense Phantom Badger; Polaris Defense’s air-transportable off-road combat vehicle DAGOR; Hendrick Dynamics’ Commando Jeep; Vyper Adamas’ Viper; and Lockheed Martin’s High Versatility Tactical Vehicle, which is a version of the British Army’s HMT-400 Jackal, were all participants in a vehicle demonstration at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, in 2014.
The Army launched its new-start GMV program in 2017 as planned, based off the service’s new combat vehicle modernization strategy released in 2016, which called for the capability.
The service said it wanted a vehicle that could carry a nine-person squad with its equipment that could be air-droppable and sling-loaded on a UH-60 Black Hawk utility helicopter.
The Army planned to reach a full-rate production decision on a vehicle by the end of FY19.
But then it decided to split GMV procurement into two phases in the FY18 budget request and, in the first phase, planned to exclusively buy 295 of GD’s Flyers through a previously awarded contract with U.S. Special Operations Command. The second phase would open up into a competition to build 1,700 more GMVs.
Procuring the GMV vehicles from SOCOM raised the unit cost of the vehicle higher than the unit cost of once procured through competition, according to FY18 budget documents.
“The Army’s plan to procure a limited quantity of ground mobility vehicles (GMV) for use by airborne brigades raises concerns due to the high unit cost of the existing vehicles,” lawmakers state in the omnibus spending bill. “However, due to the urgent requirement and the advanced stage of the Special Operations Command GMV program, the agreement includes full funding for this program and supports the interim acquisition strategy for 295 A-GMV 1.1 vehicles for fielding to conventional Army airborne brigades and 317 GMV 1.1 vehicles for fielding to the United States Army Special Operations Command.”
Congress is appropriating $41 million in the bill for GMV procurement.
The top Defense News stories of the day
Congress also noted the unit price of a developmental GMV would cost more than available nondevelopmental vehicles.
The Army is for the competition in 2018, but it has yet to drop.
These Vehicles by the Way would be totally unarmored intended instead to be transported in CH47 Chinook helicopters and Slung under UH60 Helicopters.
Congress’ new omnibus bill sets up hurdles for JSTARS recap cancellation
By: 13 hours ago
. But lawmakers didn’t make it easy for the service to walk away from it.
If passed by Congress, the language in the spending bill would prohibit the Air Force from using the $405 million designated for the Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System recapitalization program on any other effort, including the service’s new plan.
However, it does offer up a back door: Congress might be willing to move the funding to another program if requested by the Air Force, and if the Defense Department submits a report about alternatives to JSTARS recap.
“Despite years of affirmations to Congress on the need to pursue JSTARS recapitalization and an ongoing source selection process, the Air Force asserts that the program will not be viable in future contested environments and lacks compelling improvements over legacy capabilities,” the omnibus language states.
However, “the proposal to cancel JSTARS recapitalization, pursue alternatives, and ensure no duplication between efforts requires careful consideration by Congress through the fiscal year 2019 budget process.”
The Air Force requested $417 million in fiscal 18 to continue development of the JSTARS recap, with a contract award to a single vendor — either , or Northrop Grumman — expected in calendar year 2018.
But service leadership including and Chief of Staff that modified commercial planes would not be able to survive a battle with a peer competitor in a contested environment. By September, the service had acknowledged that it was seeking .
Some that the service should move forward with JSTARS recap and pursue a more disaggregated solution later, citing previous analysis supporting the effort and more than $265 million already spent on the recap program.
According to the bill, the defense secretary must submit a report to congressional defense committees that includes the following information:
In February, said the service is still working out the finer details of its new Advanced Battle Management System plan, but the general idea is that the Air Force could network together some of its existing capabilities to fill the JSTARS role.
- The plan for retiring the current E-8C JSTARS fleet and options for retaining them
- Whether the Air Force can address concerns about the survivability of the JSTARS recap by changing requirements, such as , weight, power and cooling margins of the aircraft
- The cost and schedule of the Advanced Battle Management System plan from FY19 to FY23
- The cost and schedule of procuring Army and Navy platforms that could help conduct the battle management and surveillance mission currently done by JSTARS
Near-term plans include retaining seven E-3 Airborne Warning and Control System aircraft and upgrading them with new communications gear, as well as outfitting some MQ-9 Reaper drones with a new ground moving target indicator radar.
Laser air defense system developed on JLTV by USMC
JLTV General Purpose variant fitted with a Boeing CLWS and a heavy machine gun-armed RWS (Picture source: Wikipedia)
JLTV or L-ATV made by Oshkosh defence is a bit of a Hybrid. Protection of an MRAP, Terrain ability of a Humvee without straining to deal with bolt on armor. It's one of a number of vehicles that seem to be aimed to replace the Humvee and better fill the more modern mission needs of the US DOD