US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Pentagon: Iranian boats harassed U.S. Navy ships in Strait of Hormuz

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


By Pauline Jelinek
ASSOCIATED PRESS

7:35 a.m. January 7, 2008

WASHINGTON – In what U.S. officials called a serious provocation, Iranian Revolutionary Guard boats harassed and provoked three U.S. Navy ships in the strategic Strait of Hormuz, threatening to explode the American vessels.
U.S. forces were on the verge of firing on the Iranian boats in the early Sunday incident, when the boats turned and moved away, a Pentagon official said. “It is the most serious provocation of this sort that we've seen yet,” said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak on the record.

The incident occurred at about 5 a.m. local time Sunday as a U.S. Navy cruiser, destroyer and frigate were on their way into the Persian Gulf and passing through the strait – a major oil shipping route.

Five small boats began charging the U.S. ships, dropping boxes in the water in front of the ships and forcing the U.S. ships to take evasive maneuvers, the Pentagon official said.

There were no injuries but the official said there could have been, because the Iranian boats turned away “literally at the very moment that U.S. forces were preparing to open fire” in self defense.

The official said he didn't have the precise transcript of communications that passed between the two forces, but said the Iranians radioed something like “we're coming at you and you'll explode in a couple minutes.”

Iranian officials were not immediately available for comment Monday, and there was no news of the incident on Iranian state-run media.

Historical tensions between the two nations have increased in recent years over Washington's charge that Tehran has been developing nuclear weapons and supplying and training Iraqi insurgents using roadside bombs – the No. 1 killer of U.S. troops in Iraq.

In another incident off its coast, Iranian Revolutionary Guard sailors last March captured 15 British sailors and held them for nearly two weeks.

The 15 sailors from HMS Cornwall, including one woman, were captured on March 23. Iran claims the crew, operating in a small patrol craft, had intruded into Iranian waters – a claim denied by Britain.

This weekend's incident comes as President Bush's first major trip to the Middle East is approaching. While scheduled to meet the leaders of Israel, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and other regional nations Jan. 9-16, Bush is expected to try to bolster the troubled peace process between Israel and the Palestinians but is also likely to seek backing for U.S. concerns about Iran.

Iran is under two sets of U.N. Security Council sanctions for its refusal to freeze uranium enrichment, a potential pathway to nuclear arms, and Washington is pushing for additional U.N. penalties. But a recent U.S. intelligence assessment that it probably shut down a clandestine weapons program three years ago have led to increased resistance to such a move from permanent Security Council members Russia and China, which have strategic and trade ties with Tehran.

At about this time last year, Bush announced he was sending a second aircraft carrier to the Gulf region in a show of force against Iran.

The U.S. Navy quietly scaled back to one carrier group several months later. But while the two were there, they staged two major exercises off Iran's coast.

The war games amounted to U.S. muscle-flexing at a time when Tehran increasingly was at loggerheads with the international community over its disputed nuclear program and threatened to close the strategic Strait of Hormuz for oil transports in case of a U.S. military strike on Iran.

Since then, there have been diplomatic overtures aimed at calming tensions. A May 28 meeting concerning security in Iraq between U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker and his Iranian counterpart, Hassan Kazemi Qomi, broke a 27-year diplomatic freeze between the two countries.

A planned Dec. 18 meeting between Iranian and American security, military and diplomatic experts was canceled a few days before it was to be held. At the time, Iranian officials said it was a scheduling problem while U.S. officials referred questions to the Iraqi Foreign Ministry.

And in the past month or so, U.S. officials have said Tehran appears to have slowed or halted the flow of illegal weapons across the frontier between Iran and Iraq. Iran has denied the arms smuggling accusations, insisting that it is doing its best to help stabilize its embattled western neighbor.

Iranians recently were reported to be upset that although they contributed to the improving security situation in Iraq, U.S. officials have not done enough to acknowledge it.

The United States maintains nearly 40,000 troops in Gulf countries other than Iraq, with the largest group in Kuwait and others in Qatar, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Saudi Arabia.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Guess the Iranian Revolutionary Guard has yet to figure out that if it looks east it sees American and Nato in Afghanistan and west it sees Americans and Who ever is still there with us in Iraq.
 

crazyinsane105

Junior Member
VIP Professional
Guess the Iranian Revolutionary Guard has yet to figure out that if it looks east it sees American and Nato in Afghanistan and west it sees Americans and Who ever is still there with us in Iraq.

Actually, the Iranians are pretty much in love with the fact that nearly 200,000 US personnel are in Iraq and Afghanistan. Why? Because the US can't afford to start a military confrontation with Iran. Once there is a complete pullout from Iraq and Afghanistan, then the Iranians will be much more reserved and cautious. Otherwise, this behavior is to be expected from them for the next several years...
 

Schumacher

Senior Member
Good to see they're talking again & that Adm Keating is back after the Kitty Hawk incident.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


US Pacific Commander in China for Talks

By HENRY SANDERSON – 9 hours ago

BEIJING (AP) — The U.S. military commander for the Asia-Pacific region met Chinese officials Monday on his first visit since Beijing upset the U.S. by rejecting port calls by an American aircraft carrier and other navy ships in Hong Kong.

Adm. Timothy Keating, head of the U.S. Pacific Command, met Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi in a closed meeting early Monday. Yang urged the U.S. side to maintain stability in the Taiwan Strait, saying it was the key to developing bilateral relations, the official Xinhua News Agency reported.

"The Chinese side appreciates the United States government's adherence to the one-China policy" and its opposition to Taiwanese efforts to hold a referendum on U.N. membership, he said, according to Xinhua.

The one-China policy holds that China and Taiwan are part of the same country, despite their split amid civil war in 1949. Plans by Taiwanese President Chen Shui-bian to hold a March referendum on Taiwanese membership in the U.N. have angered Beijing and concerned Washington because the wording of the measure appears to call the policy into question.

Keating, on his second visit to Beijing since he took up his post in March, was also to hold meetings with top military officials later Monday. He goes to Shanghai on Tuesday and then southern Guangdong province.

The visit comes after the Chinese turned away the USS Kitty Hawk and five ships accompanying it for a Hong Kong port call in November. During the same week two U.S. Navy minesweepers were also turned away after seeking shelter during a storm.

China had hinted that its actions were triggered by the U.S. Congress' honoring of the Dalai Lama and U.S. arms sales to Chinese rival Taiwan. China views the Dalai Lama as a "splittist" intent on separating Tibet from China, and views self-governing Taiwan as a breakaway province that it hopes to reclaim.

At the time, Keating said China's decision was "perplexing" and was not "conduct that is indicative of a country that understands its obligations as a responsible nation."

Keating was to meet Monday with Gen. Chen Bingde, the new chief of general staff in charge of day-to-day operations for the 2.3 million-member People's Liberation Army, Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission General Guo Boxiong, and Lt. Gen. Ma Xiaotian, deputy chief of the general staff for foreign affairs.

Their discussions were expected to center on China-US military ties, Taiwan and international and regional issues, the official China Daily newspaper said.

"China has a positive attitude toward developing military relations with the U.S. and hopes Keating's visit could further enhance understanding, expand consensus and boost cooperation, so as to promote the steady growth of military ties in the new year," the newspaper said, quoting a statement from China's Defense Ministry.
Hosted by Google
Copyright © 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
 

Norfolk

Junior Member
VIP Professional
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
by David Hughes, Aviation Week and Space Technology, 28 January, 2008:

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) is researching how computers reading brain waves may one day speed up the ways intelligence analysts detect targets in satellite images and also alert platoon leaders when soldiers are losing situational awareness.

This may sound like a scenario out of the science fiction movie 2001: A Space Odyssey, in which a computer named Hal overrides instructions from an astronaut to take control of a spaceship. But in the Darpa experiments, the computer is just a tool that processes brain waves, of which the human being isn’t even aware, and turns them into actionable information.

Actually, this struck me as being closer to Firefox than 2001: A Space Odyssey, but to each his own.

The latest project Kruse has been working on is the Neurotechnology for Intelligence Analysts (NIA) program. This effort builds on an earlier one titled Augmentated Cognition, or AugCog. One of the leading contractors on both efforts has been Honeywell.

Under a $4-million, multiphase contract, the company has been developing what it calls the Honeywell Image Triage System (HITS) for Darpa. Bob Smith, vice president for advanced technology at Honeywell Aerospace, explains that HITS takes a satellite image and breaks it up into smaller image “chips” that can be shown to an intelligence analyst like flash cards at a rate of 5-20 images per second.

Intriguingly more at the link.
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


U.S. Navy Breaks Record with Railgun Test-Shot

By ZACHARY M. PETERSON

DAHLGREN, VA. — The Navy set a new world record for the most powerful electromagnetic railgun when it fired a test shot here Thursday morning.

The gun fired an aluminum projectile at 10.68 megajoules. A joule is the work needed to produce one watt of energy for one second. A megajoule is 1 million joules.

Guests including Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead and Rear Adm. William Landay, head of the Office of Naval Research, witnessed the shot via a live video feed at the Naval Surface Warfare Center in Dahlgren. The gun was launched from a control center after approximately four minutes of charging the electromagnetic rails. After the charge, the gun fired and witnesses saw a quick burst of flame as the projectile, traveling at 2,500 meters per second, or Mach 7, hit its target.

Roughead called the gun a “revolutionary approach to naval warfare.” He acknowledged the Navy is “a ways from seeing this in the fleet,” but said it is important that the service “never loses sight of the next big thing.”

The previous railgun record of 9 megajoules was held by the Center for Electromagnetic Materials and Devices at the University of Texas, according to the Office of Naval Research. The Institute for Advanced Technology, also at the university, certifies electromagnetic railgun launches.

An EM railgun is powered by electricity rather than gunpowder. A shell is launched at Mach 7 through the electromagnetic rails into the atmosphere for about one minute, flies out of the atmosphere for four minutes, and then descends to Earth toward its target at Mach 5 in approximately one minute. The projectile is guided using the Global Positioning System.

In November, defense contractor BAE Systems delivered a 32-megajoule laboratory gun and launcher to Dahlgren. Eventually, the Navy wants to produce a 64-megajoule railgun that will be able to strike targets on land from more than 200 nautical miles away. General Atomics is also building a gun, program officials said. In years to come, the Navy will decide which gun will work better on a ship.

The program wants to demonstrate more than 100 shots by fiscal 2011. The objective is to fire 3,000 rounds per gun barrel. The barrels should be changeable onboard ship, according to program officials.
The Navy hopes an EM railgun onboard a ship could increase ship design options because the gun weighs less and requires less infrastructure than traditional guns that use gunpowder and magazines.

Traditional fire-protection and ammunition-handling requirements are not necessary using an electromagnetic-pulse power system. Potentially, this could change the way the service thinks about naval gunnery, Landay, the head of ONR, told reporters after the test firing.

The Navy plans to have an EM railgun onboard a ship, potentially its next-generation cruiser CG(X), between 2020 and 2025. Officials declined to say what ship would be a good candidate for the gun.
“The gun can fit on any electric ship,” said Elizabeth D’Andrea, the EM railgun program manager at ONR.

Program officials are “watching ships that are being planned,” D’Andrea added.

The Marine Corps is particularly interested in the EM railgun because it could provide high-speed, over-the-horizon fire support from the sea. The Army is developing a much smaller version of the gun for use on land. The Navy and Army programs share information regularly as their programs progress, Landay said.

Nonetheless, the EM railgun remains in the early stages of development. The program faces four major technological challenges, D’Andrea noted: insuring the gun tube can withstand multiple shots; reducing the size of the gun’s power generator; ensuring the projectile is safe and reliable; and ship integration.

The Navy has yet to determine a cost estimate for an EM railgun, Landay said. The program is conscious of cost and is working with Naval Sea Systems Command to monitor “cost drivers,” the admiral explained, but for now the Navy is “trying to get the science and technology right” before moving toward a finished product.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Norfolk

Junior Member
VIP Professional
B-2 Spirit crashes on Guam.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, BBC News, Saturday, 23 February 2008:


The jet crashed shortly after taking off from the island's Andersen Air Force Base, but both pilots ejected and survived, the US Air Force (USAF) said.

Black smoke could be seen billowing from the site, witnesses said.
More at the link.

Thankfully, both crewmen are okay; unfortunately, with only 21 B-2 bombers, minus the one mowing the turf at Andersen AFB, the modern USAF bomber force is decidely few, and getting fewer. The B-52 is very elderly, and proposals to extend its life in service to 2043 or so are simply incredible. The B-1 has finally got most of its bugs ironed out, but has already been in service for well over twenty years now. The Air Force even began withdrawing the B-1 from service in 2006, but realized that by doing so, it would lose most of its heavy bomber capability, and quickly reversed itself.
 

SampanViking

The Capitalist
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
That was a $1.2 Billion Bonfire!!

It goes to show how risky this high tech strategy can be, too many losses in time of crisis and you are very quickly in trouble.
 

Norfolk

Junior Member
VIP Professional
Two pieces of Doctrine news today. U.S. Joint Forces Command has released
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to the public, and the U.S. Army has also released
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, to the public as well. These are the primary Operational-level doctrinal publications for the U.S. Armed Forces as a whole, and the U.S. Army, respectively.

So take that FAS, SDF beat you to posting the link to the new FM 3-0!;):D
 
Last edited:
Top