US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Franklin

Captain
US is seeking to counter the rising capabilities of the Chinese air force and seeks new weapons to do so. That includes direct energy weapons.

China aims to challenge U.S. air dominance: Pentagon

China is mounting a serious effort to challenge U.S. military superiority in air and space, forcing the Pentagon to seek new technologies and systems to stay ahead of its rapidly developing rival, Deputy Defense Secretary Robert Work said on Monday.

The Pentagon's chief operating officer, speaking to a group of military and civilian aerospace experts, said China was "quickly closing the technological gaps," developing radar-evading aircraft, advanced reconnaissance planes, sophisticated missiles and top-notch electronic warfare equipment.

While hoping for a constructive relationship with China, the Pentagon "cannot overlook the competitive aspects of our relationship, especially in the realm of military capabilities, an area in which China continues to improve at a very impressive rate," he said.

China's state-run news agency Xinhua late on Monday cited Xu Qiliang, a vice chairman of the powerful Central Military Commission, as saying China must innovate even more.

"Our military's equipment construction is shifting from catch-up research to independent innovations," Xu said.

Work made his remarks to the inaugural conference of the China Aerospace Studies Initiative, a partnership of the U.S. Air Force and the RAND Corporation think tank. The initiative aims to boost U.S. research on China's aerospace ambitions.

The conference came as hundreds of Chinese officials were in Washington for the three-day U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue, wide-ranging talks that look at areas of mutual cooperation and address points of friction.

Asked about the timing of the military conference, Work said U.S. and Chinese leaders both see the bilateral relationship as one in which there are "measures of cooperation and measures of competition."

"We're hoping over time that the cooperative aspects outweigh competitive aspects," Work added. "As the Department of Defense, we're the hedge force. ... We say, 'Look, here are capabilities that we see that the Chinese are developing and it's important for us to be able to counter those."

Work, citing a Harvard study on rising powers confronting established powers, told the conference that interactions between the two often result in war. As a result, the Defense Department must "hedge against this international competition turning more heated."

The United States has generally felt the best hedge is a strong nuclear and conventional deterrence capable of overmatching any rival, he added.

Work said the United States has relied on technological superiority for the past 25 years, but now "the margin of technological superiority upon which we have become so accustomed ... is steadily eroding."

To adjust, he said, the Pentagon is working to develop new technologies to maintain its edge and lower the cost of responding to attacks. Directed energy weapons, for example, might be able to shoot down missiles that cost a hundred times the price of a jolt of energy.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

strehl

Junior Member
Registered Member
thanks TE, I wouldn't have thought it possible for a highest-tech airplane not to have it ... but I don't want to sound as an enemy of the state LOL


It might be a matter of priority and limited funding. Raptors are designed for BVR engagements and the AIM120D has off-boresight capability as provided by the AESA field of view. The Raptor air superiority loadout has 6 AMRAAMS but only 2 Sidewinders. They certainly want to have an HMD for short range dogfighting but that isn't how the F-22 is supposed to fight.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
F-22 have every interest attack with BVR AAM taking advantage of its stealth which is the best in more but it is very manoeuvrable with its vectored thrust ( 2D, Russian engines 3 D ) and realy designed for close combat especially with this 2 AIM-9 and a gun with 480 rounds !

F-35 less manoeuvrable, fast better he attack to long range especially vs new/future 5th gen adversaries nevertheless it would have a lower stealth to them.
 

Brumby

Major
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


While the Navy had originally planned to upgrade all of its 62 Burkes to Baseline 9, the Navy elected as part of the FY 2015 budget submission to reduce the modernizations for its 28 Flight I and II destroyers and only funded seven Baseline 9 ships.

The modernization effort shrunk further as part of the FY 2016 budget submission when the service elected to further reduce its modernization profile cutting five of the more modern
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in its five year funding plan.

The USN needs to make up its mind regarding its objectives. If the plan is to maximise availability of vessels capable of handling multiple type threats than it is simply a case of maximising outcome from available resources. Complaining about the lack of funds is not proactively managing the issue because funding will always be limited. In my view, the USN should pursue the modernisation path and slow down the procurement of new Burkes. Spending $500 million to modernise 5 ships sure beat spending $2.0 billion on a new Burke in effectiveness.
 
I wanted to leave the F-22 topic, but since you quoted me
It might be a matter of priority and limited funding. Raptors are designed for ...
I did additional "research" and I think the helmet is not included in
3.2B
• Integration of AIM-9X and AIM-120D missiles
• Upgraded geolocation and electronic protection subsystems
Increment from p. 4 of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(p. 8 of 24 in that PDF file), which would mean increasing the cost from, quoting that document again,
"When the final aircraft was delivered in 2012, the F-22 acquisition program was completed at a totalestimated cost of over $67 billion." plus "the current cost estimate of $11.3 billion is divided between modernization and improvement efforts" (this quote relates to increments up to 3.2B, I believe), more than $78b, to ... ? I can't find the cost estimate for the helmet
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
US Navy vessels visiting Freemantle, Australia. Ahoy mates!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



USS-Preble-Takes-a-Rest-in-Fremantle-Australia-1024x779.jpg

USS-Green-Bay-Sails-to-Australia-1024x690.jpg

They are a part of the US Expeditionary Strike Group patrolling in the area, where embarked sailors and Marines from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) are visiting to prepare for the upcoming biennial military training exercise Talisman Sabre 2015.

The US and its allies are constantly training like this with multiple in depth exercises each year.
 
Top