US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
I take it as a high compliment Mr. Brumby to be mentioned in the same sentence as Spanky, he is a true international Hero, and a gentlemen who proved himself capable of fitting in to a German fighter sqdn. Spanky walks the walk. One of our Russian or German posters may also have hands on experience with the Mig-29, and I would of course defer to them, our own Mr. Scratch may actually have a little face time with the 29 as well?

Most pilots of the true bird man blood, will rate the F-22 as far superior to the poor little ThunderHogge II, but make no mistake as the Brat has come to love her and see her as Raptor Light, she will be a winner, she will come out on top, and gentlemen of Mr. Spanky's caliber will fight her to victory. As the reality and the Bitter Anger at killing the Raptor production wore off, the Brat had to come to the Old Man's favorite admonition,,,,,,in the USAF, On the FARM, he would say "you've got to GO with what you GOT!"

Thank you Mr. Brumby and ThunderChief, you young gentlemen are students of Fighter 101, trust the old Brat and the Headmaster, when we say, the F-35 will be a winner, the men and women of the United States Military, and our Partners will make it so! Heh! Heh! Heh! they are the true heroes, the AFB is just a cheerleader!
 
I think that's important:
CNO wants more high-tech assets, delivered quickly
Nearly half of the Navy's $2 billion science and technology budget will be spent on discovery and the invention of technologies that may not reach the fleet for another five to 20 years. Leaders are therefore looking at ways to more quickly put emerging technologies in the hands of sailors and Marines.

The funding will focus on nine areas: assured access to maritime battlespace; autonomy and unmanned systems; electromagnetic maneuver warfare; expeditionary and irregular warfare; information dominance — cyber; platform design and survivability; power and energy; power projection and integrated defense; and warfighter performance.

Adm. Jonathan Greenert, chief of naval operations, was direct in listing his priorities for the nearly 3,000 in attendance at the Naval Future Force Science and Technology Expo, being held in Washington, D.C., Wednesday and Thursday. The CNO's priorities are:

1. Getting off gun powder. Lasers and railguns will provide an incredibly deep magazine at remarkably low cost, he said.

2. Developing unmanned underwater vehicles with greater propulsion capacity that will help the U.S. maintain underwater dominance and bridge the gap when the sub fleet begins a 10-year dip in mid-2020.

3. Protecting proprietary data. Greenert said this keeps him up at night, as the high-tech innovations of today will be classified top secret tomorrow.

Greenert noted that he didn't come into his job "with a thing for science and technology," but quickly realized the need to focus on this area. Now, it drives many of his strategy and budget decisions. He urged a focus on relevant capability resulting in swift delivery to the fleet.

Though Rear Adm. Mat Winter, the Navy's new chief of naval research, has only been in the job for about a month, he has a long history in acquisitions as well as research and development. Science and technology is an "awesome mission," he said, adding "if you're not having fun, you're not doing it right."

Part of his strategy to meet Greenert's challenge is to find "the next flubber and flux capacitor." Indeed, 12 percent of the budget will be spent on leap-ahead innovations.

While many programs are classified, Winter said some key efforts will be made in underwater and electromagnetic maneuver warfare. The next-generation fighter also is a top focus.

Greenert said it must have manned and unmanned capabilities and carry a spectrum of weapons. Stealth and speed are not top priorities; in fact, "stealth may be overrated," he said.

The fighter must have full spectrum dominance, autonomous sensor and payload integration and next-generation advanced propulsion, Winter said. What is that? "We will let you know when we get it," he said.

Just a stone's throw away from the Walter E. Washington Convention Center, lawmakers are beginning to address the president's budget. Defense Secretary nominee Ash Carter is expected to call for "sweeping defense reforms" in his opening remarks at Wednesday's confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Greenert believes there is also a need for a "national debate on defense investment." The Budget Control Act will again dramatically reduce investment in defense, and the "pressing need" for modernization over the next decade will be pushed further into the future if sequestration budget cuts continue.

"If this happens, we will fall behind our adversaries," Greenert said.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Scratch

Captain
One of our Russian or German posters may also have hands on experience with the Mig-29, and I would of course defer to them, our own Mr. Scratch may actually have a little face time with the 29 as well?
Unfortunately no. She left just a little too early. Although I think I came across one in a museum once. But there's some rememberable stories of former Fulcrum jocks providing an unpleasent suprise to unkowing western pilots. Especially with the HMS / Archer combo. An experiance that in part triggered development of the IRIS-T and AIM-9X. And I would guess also the british AIM-132, although that one follows a slightly different concept than the previous two.
And it could do some good maneuvering too, although with really rather short legs.

Additionally I feel a little validation on my earlier statements that the usefullness / advantage of TVC over other jets in maneuvering fights is somewhat overhyped. Quite a bit of data on that also came from the X-31 project, a programm in wich german industry, through MBB, had a considerable stake. With all that data it was decided that TVC was not a requirement to achieve the EFs design objective of superb maneuverablitiy.
There's been reports about german EF in India going against MKIs. While they were generally very strong aircraft and could suprise a non exspecting pilot, after pulling such a cobra stunt in the mid 20k feet, their only exit was pretty much down, wich made them easy prey for a EF pilot being ready for it. Using the vertical and their high kinematic energy to maneuver for a kill.
________________________________________________________________________

Also, the USN budget with new shipbuilding plan is out. On the list are 10 Burkes & Virginias each. Advanced procurement for the SSBN(X) and 14 LCS. The first two modified ones will arrive in 2019.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


USN Budget Includes $10B for New Missile Sub
Christopher P. Cavas 4:19 p.m. EST February 3, 2015

WASHINGTON — The Navy plans to fund a total of 48 ships through fiscal 2020, according to the 2016 budget sent today to Congress, including 10 new Arleigh Burke-class destroyers and 10 Virginia-class submarines from 2016 through 2020.

Advanced procurement for the SSBN(X) strategic missile submarine begins in 2017, with the first ship to be ordered in 2021. The cost to build a class of 12 submarines is expected to dominate service shipbuilding budgets through the 2020s.

Last summer, the Navy estimated the procurement cost for the first of 12 planned SSBN(X) subs to cost about $12.4 billion, but is working to get the average cost of each submarine down to about $5 billion.

[...]

Elsewhere in the shipbuilding budget, 14 littoral combat ships (LCS) are planned, with the first two modified littoral frigates scheduled for 2019. The newly updated ship construction program includes a new carrier in 2018, the LHA 8 assault ship in 2017, a new LXR) amphibious transport dock replacement ship in 2020, an afloat forward staging base ship in 2017, and a new class of fleet tugs, with the first of five coming in 2017. ...

In other news, the USN UCLASS programm is delayed by 3 years, however.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Washington DC
Source: Flightglobal.com
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
The US Navy's 2016 budget request is just slightly higher than planned for a year ago, in line with overall Pentagon plans to ask for funding at levels above Budget Control Act restrictions.
In Monday's request to Congress, the Navy Department is asking for baseline funding of $161 billion, up from last year's projected $159.5 billion. Another $7 billion requested under supplemental funding brings the total 2016 Navy and Marine Corps budget request to $168 billion.
Future years' funding projections for 2017-2019 also have been raised about $1.5 billion per year.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Totals for most individual Navy accounts are higher than last year. Procurement funding shows an overall jump of $6 billion, up to $44.4 billion from last year's requested $38.4 billion.
Three billion comes from new aircraft buys — in particular the restoration of 29 Sikorsky MH-60R helicopters deleted from last year's request as part of a now-canceled plan to decommission the aircraft carrier George Washington. Funding to complete the carrier's mid-life reactor refueling overhaul accounts for much of the $2.2 billion increase in shipbuilding, which rises to $16.6 billion from $14.4 billion a year ago.
Overall, procurement is 28 percent of the budget request, a jump from 25 percent last year.
Operations and maintenance funding rises $3.6 billion to $50.4 billion, comprising 31 percent of the request versus 32 percent in 2015.
US Navy Budget Request Funds Carrier GW

Military personnel spending rises $1 billion to $46 billion, 29 percent of the request. Last year's personnel spending took up 31 percent of overall Navy spending. Navy personnel strength shows a jump of 4,900 people, largely due to restoration of the carrier and its associated air wing, plus crews for several cruisers the Navy is keeping in service. Small increases come from the planned introduction of two new helicopter maritime strike squadrons — HSM-79 in 2016 and HSM-76 in 2017 — for the additional MH-60R helos.
The number of civilians directly employed by the Navy shows a significant reduction, dropping more than 14,000 people to 200,959 employees from last year's total of 215,014.
Research and development funding jumps $1.6 billion to $17.9 billion, largely due to $1.3 billion in cyber spending.
The Navy is asking for nine new ships in 2016 — all eight ships projected a year ago plus the balance of funding for a 12th San Antonio-class ship, LPD 28, that Congress added and partially funded in 2015. The shipbuilding request is filled out with two Virginia-class submarines, two Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, three littoral combat ships, and the first T-AO(X) fleet oiler. A new LHA(R) assault ship continues to be programmed for 2017.
Aircraft buys reflect the additional MH-60R helicopters and the restoration of MQ-8C Fire Scout unmanned helicopters for littoral combat ships, soon to be called frigates. A year ago, the Navy decided to end Fire Scout procurement in 2015, but two aircraft per year have been added to this year's request. Procurement of RQ-21A Black Jack unmanned aerial vehicles has also been increased, with seven vehicles in 2016 — compared with none a year ago — although last year's plan to buy four MQ-4C Triton large maritime reconnaissance UAVs is reduced to three aircraft.
As usual, the Navy tweaks its buys of the F-35 joint strike fighter. Buys of the F-35B short-takeoff vertical landing version for the Marine Corps continue as planned, with nine aircraft in 2016, while requests for the F-35C carrier variant rise to four aircraft in 2016 — up from two a year ago — but are reduced by two aircraft per year in 2017 and 2018.
In line with last year's budget-driven reductions in weapons buys, the Navy again is slashing some munitions procurement. Buys of Standard SM-6 surface-to-air missiles drop from 125 to 113; Evolved Sea Sparrow Missiles drop from 89 to 30; and upgrades for Mark 54 lightweight torpedoes are cut from 216 to 140.
On the plus side, 100 Tactical Tomahawk cruise missiles have been added to 2016, up from zero last year, and 24 new, yet-to-be-identified surface-to-surface missile for littoral combat ships now appear in 2017. Buys of air-to-air weapons show increases — AIM-9X Sidewinders jump from 215 to 273, and AIM-120 advanced medium-range air-to-air missiles rise from 138 to 167, but buys of the Joint Standoff Weapon-C were zeroed out from last year's planned 200 units.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



GD-NASSCO-to-Christen-US-Navys-Future-MLP-3-1024x589.jpg

Naval Today said:
US Navy’s future USNS Lewis B. Puller (MLP 3 AFSB) will be christened on Saturday, February 7, at General Dynamics NASSCO Shipyard, in San Diego.

The MLP AFSB is designed to provide dedicated support for Airborne Mine Countermeasures (AMCM) as well as special warfare missions.

The ship is capable of supporting additional missions including: counter-piracy operations, maritime security operations, humanitarian aid and disaster relief missions and Marine Corps crisis response. As reported by IHS Jane’s 360, Puller is scheduled for delivery in September.

USNS Lewis B. Puller, the third vessel of the Mobile Landing Platform (MLP) class, is the first purpose-built Afloat Forward Staging Base (AFSB) vessel for the US Navy. The 764-foot vessel will feature a flight deck, a hangar and will be able to accommodate about 250 persons.


Lewis Puller (MLP-3) and its unnamed
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(MLP-4) will differ quite a bit from the first two Mobile Landing Platform support vessels, Montofrd Point (MLP-1) and John Glenn (MLP-2) . The first two ships serve as "Sea Bases" for
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
forces by acting as a floating base and transfer station well off of the target area.

The Lewis Puller and MLP-4 will act as afloat forward staging bases (AFSB) to support air and amphibious assault missions to some extent, but will also be used to support mine clearance missions,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, as well as
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
missions.

AFSB vessels are designed to operate further away form higher intensity combat, allowing more expensive, high-value
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to be not have to address those missions and thus be available for more demanding operational missions for the U.S. Navy.

The AFSB vessels are slated to operate in the Middle East and the Pacific Ocean.
After full completion later in 2015, the USNS Lewis Puller will replace the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the current, interim AFSB support ship.


Depiction of AFSB operations
USNS_Lewis_B__Puller_(MLP-3)_artist_impression.jpg
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
Hey Jeff do you see in the future these AFSB vessels will be a replacement for any over seas bases OR as a support addition to those bases?
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
USAF speeds up development of new air-launched cruise missile
By:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

WASHINGTON DC
Source: Flightglobal.com
19 hours ago
The US Air Force has both accelerated development of its long-range standoff weapon (LRSO) and dramatically increased funding to the programme over the next five years.

LRSO seeks a nuclear-capable replacement for the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
AGM-86 air launched cruise missile (ALCM) carried by the Boeing B-52 and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
bombers.

Since 2012, four companies have been working on trade studies for the LRSO design: Boeing,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, Northrop
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and Raytheon.

The programme had been gearing up to release a request for proposals in the first half of 2017, but the FY2016 budget request moves up the start date in the fourth quarter this year. A technology maturation and risk reduction contract award is now expected by the end of 2016.

LRSO netted $36 million in fiscal 2016, but that figure increases exponentially to a peak of $650 million in FY 2019. Just short of $5 million was allocated to the programme in the current fiscal year and the programme was set to top out at $144 million in fiscal 2019 in that spending plan.

Despite hastening the pace of development, the LRSO is one of a handful of air force programmes where officials are planning to sacrifice capability to save money.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Secretary Deborah Lee James in January announced that four programmes, including LRSO, will undergo a cost/capability analysis (CCA) to identify capability downgrades that could yield significant cost savings while still achieving prescribed requirements.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Railgun News:
3-star: 'Lot of work' before railgun arrives in fleet
The Navy's weaponeers have built a working railgun. Now it falls to Vice Adm. William Hilarides to figure out what to do with it.

The electromagnetic railgun comes in at about 30 feet. It will be loaded aboard a joint high-speed vessel later this year, with an at-sea live fire demonstration set for next year. Beyond that, it falls to Hilarides and the systems engineers at Naval Sea Systems Command to turn what's essentially a lab gun into the fleet's most fearsome deck gun — capable of firing a shell 100 nautical miles.

Hilarides listed three barriers to surmount at the Naval Future Force Science and Technology Expo in Washington Thursday:

Space. The JHSV has 600 tons of excess payload capacity, "but I have to sit [the railgun] on a destroyer that has 20 tons of excess payload capacity," he said. "You got it out at sea and it's wet, OK. But once it's done ... how do I get it on destroyers?"

Power. The railgun also uses 34 mega joules of power to launch a 23-pound projectile to distances greater than 100 miles at speeds topping Mach 7 (better than 5,300 mph). While Zumwalt-class destroyers will generate roughly 78 mega joules (twice the power the railgun needs), most destroyers have in reserve less than one-third of the power the railgun needs. And there are a whole bunch of limitations on what can be done inside the ship to add power generators. Developers will house power generators in con-ex boxes during the JHSV demonstration, but a permanent power solution will be needed before the railgun lands in the fleet.

Control. Aegis is a fully integrated combat system on cruisers and destroyers, and the railgun's fire control loop doesn't yet know how to talk to that system. Engineers will need to build controls into Aegis, programming and hardware changes that could take months or years.

"Well, I can shoot it from a laptop," Hilarides said. "That's not combat capable. That's not what you want to do. You want to get the railgun to a fight, you're going to be on a ship like the DDG and it's got to fit, and fit tight. So, there's a lot of work to be done."
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

navyreco

Senior Member
U.S. Navy Hawkeye Crew Evaluated USAF's E-8C JSTARS for Future Maritime Missions
mUypFug.jpg

The E-8C Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System, also known as JSTARS, flown by the 116th and 461st Air Control Wings, recently participated in naval exercises to enhance joint service training in a contested environment. The U.S. Navy’s Composite Training Unit Exercise tested crews’ ability to respond to a variety of threats for which the E-8C Joint STARS long range radar capability provided land and sea radar information to the Carrier Strike Group 4 based out of Norfolk, Virginia.
...
Flying on board JSTARS was Navy Lt. j.g. John Duffner, a naval flight officer with the Carrier Airborne Early Warning Squadron 126 out of Norfolk.

“The precision of the radar and the sheer size of the crew on JSTARS enables them to do more things simultaneously than we can do,” said Duffner. “It’s been a very interesting week, and I definitely know a lot more about how JSTARS works than I did before and I’ve been impressed.”

During the missions, the naval aviator received hands-on training and got to compare the E-2C Hawkeye command and control platform that he’s accustomed to with the JSTARS platform.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top