US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
The US Navy announced on 6 October its will purchase a Gulfstream G550 modified to carry the conformal airborne early warning system (CAEW).

A request for proposals for a range support aircraft (RSA) was initially released in March 2013, resulting in the non-competitive contract award to Gulfstream because “no other type of supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements,” the document reads. The Navy will take delivery no later than the end of fiscal 2017.

While Gulfstream builds the airframe, Elta Systems, which is a subsidiary of Israel Aerospace Systems, is the prime contractor and systems integrator for the G550 CAEW aircraft. The US Navy will become the system's fourth customer, following orders from the Israeli Air Force, Republic of Singapore Air Force and the Italian Air Force.

asset image

An RSA is needed to support range operations of the Naval Test Wing Pacific and Air and Test and Evaluation Squadron VX-30 at Point Mugu, California. VX-30 flies the Lockheed S-3 Viking, P-3 Orion and C-130. The squadron’s aircraft are aging and need to be replaced because of “significant service life and sustainment challenges,” the navy says. The service is anticipating a 25-year service life for the RSA aircraft.

“The Gulfstream G550 CAEW aircraft is the only known aircraft that will satisfy the NAWC-WD Sea Range Support requirements without significant engineering, development, modification, test, and certification effort,” the navy says. “No other known commercial derivative aircraft that possesses these necessary type certificates is capable of meeting the mission requirements, and therefore the G550 CAEW is the only aircraft that can meet the Government's requirements on a timely basis.”

The G550 has both US Federal Aviation Administration type certification and supplemental type certificates to meet the Defense Department’s airworthiness requirements and is designed to host as many as three telemetry antennas for L, S and C band radio signals. The antennas would have to be mounted to the side of the fuselage and contained within a fairing.

Navy officials sought an aircraft with a minimum range of 4,500nm (8,334km) capable of cruising at low altitudes that could be equipped with an airborne telemetry system and command destruct and flight termination system, a range surveillance and range clearance radar and internal and external communications systems. The G550 CAEW has a range of 6,750nm (12,501km).

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Sikorsky S97 Raider

Yesterday at the Sikorsky Aircraft West Palm Beach, Florida facility they unveiled the first of two S-97 RAIDER™ helicopter prototypes, signaling the start of activities in the program’s test flight phase and a major step toward demonstrating the new – and first – armed reconnaissance rotorcraft featuring X2™ Technology designed for military missions – 3rd October 2014

The S-97 Raider is a light tactical helicopter being developed by Sikorsky to demonstrate the capabilities of the company's X2 Technology. The technology is claimed to offer safer high-speed flights with improved efficiency and safety.

The S-97 Raider will be offered to the US Armed Forces for flight testing and evaluation for future combat missions. The helicopter is suitable for assault and armed reconnaissance missions. The technology is, however, scalable to a range of other missions such as close-air support, combat search and rescue and special operations. It can fly at speeds of more than 220kt at 10,000ft altitude.

Designed with a lower turning radius and acoustic noise signature, the S-97 is expected to be a game-changer in the light military helicopters segment.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Sikorsky built this bird without any funding from the Federal government.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
SSC contenders

A couple of weeks back, we acquainted you with U.S. Navy's program to design and build a new class of warship to fill the gap between today's coastal patrol vessels, and larger vessels -- destroyer-size and up. Dubbed the "Small Surface Combatant," no one's quite certain what the new vessel will look like. What is known, is that the project could mean billions and billions of dollars in revenue for the company chosen to build the ship.


The USS Chesapeake was one of the US Navy's original "six frigates." Its 21st Century variant will be a bit more advanced. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

And now we know the names of the companies that might win the award. As confirmed last week by DefenseNews.com, the usual suspects submitted ideas for the new vessel.

Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT ) , which is offering a larger variant of its Freedom-class monohull Littoral Combat Ship, or LCS, design, scaled up to frigate size.


Australia's Austal (NASDAQOTH: AUTLY ) , which builds the Navy's trimaran-design Independence-class LCS, plans to submit a design in which the Independence's interchangeable weapons bays will be replaced with permanently installed weapon systems.


Photo: Austal.

Huntington Ingalls (NYSE: HII ) is offering the military a scaled-up and armed-up variant of the National Security Cutter that it already builds for the U.S. Coast Guard.


Photo: Huntington Ingalls.

There are also a couple of surprise entrants in this competition.

General Dynamics (NYSE: GD ) , which turned over shipbuilding responsibilities on the LCS to partner Austal (to focus on building the vessel's weapons systems), appears to be having second thoughts. General Dynamics is keeping mum on details of just what, precisely, it proposes to build for the Navy. However, the company was recently tapped to submit designs for a proposed new Offshore Patrol Cutter for the U.S. Coast Guard. The odds are pretty good, therefore, that whatever SSC design General Dynamics has offered the Navy looks a lot like this:


Illustration of what the new Offshore Patrol Cutter might look like. Source: U.S. Coast Guard.

Finally (at least for now), defense contractor Raytheon (NYSE: RTN ) has responded to the Navy's request for information by submitting not a ship design, per se, but a suggested complement of weapons and sensor systems for outfitting whatever vessel the Navy ultimately decides to buy.


Illustration depicting the capabilities of Raytheon's new Air and Missile Defense S-Band Radar (AMDR-S), soon to be installed aboard all new Navy guided missile destroyers. Source: Raytheon.

And these are only the companies that responded to the Navy's request for information. Once the Navy decides on the specs it wants built into the SSC, and invites the submission of firm bids, we could see additional interest emerge from shipbuilders in Spain, Italy, and elsewhere. In fact, I'd be shocked if Britain's BAE Systems doesn't make a bid, considering the success it's enjoyed in international sales of its budget-priced, Khareef-class corvette.

What does it mean to you?
In short, these are still early days in what promises to be a years-long process of:
•reviewing the data submitted in response to the Navy's request for information
•issuing an official request for proposals
•choosing one of these proposals, and picking a company to build the SSC, before finally getting the first prototype built

If it acts true to form, the Navy may even introduce an intermediary step in this process, "shortlisting" two or three of the companies bidding on SSC to firm up their designs, sharpen their pencils, and bid against each other for the right to build the best ship at the least cost to the taxpayer. So it's going to be quite some time before any of the companies named above, or any competitors yet to enter the competition, see much money (other than a handful of millions for development work) from the SSC program.

Still, when the big money does begin flowing, it should be a significant amount.

Experts who follow the progress of the SSC project now estimate that the likely cost of the program will be $700 million-$800 million per Small Surface Combatant vessel built. That's below the "line in the sand" initially drawn by the Navy, which warned defense contractors to steer far away from a ceiling price of $1 billion per ship. It still implies, though, a project value of anywhere from $14 billion (assuming about 20 or so ships are "bought") to perhaps as much as $41.6 billion (if the Navy buys SSCs in the same numbers as for the LCSs that it originally intended to acquire).

For now, let's round it off and call the SSC a $40 billion opportunity. That estimate will probably be close enough for government work.

Top dividend stocks for the next decade
It could take a decade before the U.S. Navy gets to christen its first new Small Surface Combatant -- but if you're lucky, you could be collecting fat dividend checks from the contract winner while you wait. The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term -- and that defense stocks pay some of the fattest dividends on offer. Smart investors also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

Rich Smith has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon Company. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
On the Fury:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Since this is smaller I can imagine it probably can be fitted into the Navy X-47 drone system. Provide less collateral damages plus more affordable than your convention laser guided smart bombs.

fury-in-flight-490x337.png
 

cyan1320

Junior Member
hmmm...
if this turns out to be real, then we have a very serious problem
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


An employee of defense giant Northrop Grumman Inc. claims in a lawsuit that the company’s workers repeatedly took risky shortcuts and faked tests of navigational systems made for use in military fighter jets, drones and submarines.
 

strehl

Junior Member
Registered Member
Latest video on Sikorsky corporate Youtube page. New CGI begins around 2:25.


[video=youtube;cucSg6dd9a0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cucSg6dd9a0&list=UUTJoP1HY16QwaGyTJATWMLw[/video]
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
The following is a pretty comprehensive article about the Zumwalts, their current status, and the design changes that have been implemented.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



zumwalt-ddg1000-02.jpg


Defense News said:
BATH, MAINE — The ship is plainly visible from Front Street, across the Route 1 bridge in downtown Bath. Nothing like this angular, almost hulking giant has ever been seen here, even after well over a century of shipbuilding at Bath Iron Works.

The futuristic shape of the Zumwalt, DDG 1000, has become familiar after more than a decade of graphics presentations and artist drawings, and models of the destroyer have been a staple at naval expositions for years. But now the whole ship is coming together, all construction blocks assembled and set afloat. People walk her decks and she rises and falls with the tide as all that planning turns into a real thing. She’ll take to the sea for the first time in the spring.

The epitome of naval stealth design, Zumwalt’s sleek shapes belie a ship filled with new features. Walking aboard, one of the first impressions is one of size — she is by far the largest ship ever called a “destroyer.” So, one would think, she must be roomy inside.

Ship Description and Layout:

Below decks, a main deck passageway is large and wide, designed to quickly and easily move supplies and ammunition to storage rooms below. But the forward hull is also taken up with the automatic reload equipment and shell magazines for the ship’s two 155mm advanced gun systems — the biggest guns built into a naval ship since World War II.

The guns own the centerline real estate that, on other missile ships, is taken up by vertical launch systems. On Zumwalt, missile cells flank the guns, lining the sides of the hull fore and aft in a peripheral arrangement. Between the guns and the missile, that pretty much takes up the forward hull.

Amidships, the knife-like bow turns into a full, wide hull, crammed with power equipment. Zumwalt is an electric ship, with 78.5 megawatts of installed power — an unheard-of feature in a destroyer. Power units are arranged throughout the ship, reminding everyone of the different nature of its integrated power system, able to shift power from propulsion to sensors to weapons.

The bridge sits low on the superstructure on the O2 level, and will be staffed by a minimum of three watchstanders. During a visit this summer, shipbuilders were busy installing the windows, specially designed to withstand the green water expected to come as the narrow bow slices through, rather than rides, over waves.

Behind the bridge, the ship mission center is taking shape, but scaffolding rose through the space’s two levels. More crew members will be assigned here than any other place, some working in a mezzanine area on the O3 level.

As expected, the machinery spaces are big — but surprisingly crowded. The power plant features two large MT-30 main turbine generators, two MT-5 auxiliary turbine generators and two advanced induction motors to generate all that electrical power.

Aft, a large boat bay sits under the flight deck, able to stow two 11-meter rigid-hull inflatable boats on a ramp with a third parked in the overhead. Doors in the transom open to extend the ramp to launch and recover boats at ship speeds of up to 13 knots.

Throughout, Zumwalt features systems that open or retract or lift or lower, many of them classified or restricted. A towed array system and towed torpedo countermeasures system will be installed aft. Side doors to handle underway replenishment will open to extend handling gear, special radars will rise on retractable masts.

The epitome of stealth design, the destroyer Zumwalt is coming together at Bath Iron Works, Maine, and is expected to go to sea in the spring. At almost 16,000 tons, 610 feet long, about 81 feet abeam, the DDG 1000 is the largest destroyer in history.

Except for the flight deck, sailors will rarely appear topside when the ship is underway. Foredeck lifelines will be retracted when the ship is at sea. Embarkation and mooring stations are hidden behind doors in the hull.

One concession to conventionality has been to install a small mast at the forward end of the superstructure to carry the national ensign, a change made more convenient when a small conical structure carrying sensors was deleted.

Interview with Captain James Kirk:
“You know, she is almost 16,000 tons, 610 feet long, about 81 feet abeam, you imagine that everything must be spacious,” said Capt. James Kirk, Zumwalt’s prospective commanding officer. “But when you get on her, you realize she is packed full of the equipment necessary to operate her and give her the capability to fight.”

While Zumwalt certainly looks like no other destroyer, Kirk insists she’ll be able to mix easily with the fleet.

“From a lot of different aspects, she is a multimission destroyer capable of doing the same kinds of missions that the cruisers and the Arleigh Burkes [destroyers] can do,” he said.

“What makes her unique is the power she generates, the survivability that is inherent within lots of her features, and then that gun. That is a unique aspect for this ship.”

The guns, however, while not designed to shoot at moving targets, will give the three ships of the Zumwalt class an entirely new capability, Kirk insisted.

“When you are carrying hundreds of rounds, your ability to influence what is going on is significantly greater,” he explained. “If you are carrying so many Tomahawk missiles and 600 rounds of long-range land-attack projectiles, you have a significant advantage. I think that is pretty unique.”

One area in which the ship will not be as capable is in its ability to provide area air defense, covering other ships over a wide area.

“It is limited,” Kirk acknowledged. “It is not the same air defense as the cruiser. But it is still quite capable.” All indications, he said, show “that her ability to do air defense is going to be pretty capable but not with the same sort of ranges because of the deletion of volume search radar. You just do not have the same capability as on a destroyer or a cruiser with the Aegis SPY-1 radar.”

The ship’s flight deck is considerably larger than Burke-class destroyers.

“She has got a flight deck almost two times the size of a Burke’s,” Kirk noted. That, along with carrying a special operating force, “is pretty significant. You take it altogether. If I had a military problem that needed to be solved, there are definitely missions this ship can do that other ships would not be as well-suited to do.”

One big question to be answered when the ship goes to sea will be how its unusual tumblehome hull — in which the hull narrows above the waterline — handles in the open ocean.

“This hull form is going to have different stability characteristics about its maneuvering that we are going to have to be very conscious of,” Kirk said. “And I am confident, from what I see, that we are going to have the guidance and technical information we need to have in order to fly her, in order to maneuver her properly given the weather that is around us.”

The Zumwalts will have maneuvering limitations just like any ship, he said.

“If you have a certain wave action with certain speeds, you can have a dynamic stability that becomes compromised,” he explained. “Then you need to make sure you are using the proper amount of turn and speed to limit risks to the dynamic stability of the ship. And I am comfortable with what I see that we know how to operate the ship in whatever seas we face.”

Design Changes to the Sclass:
DDG 1000 Program Manager Capt. James Downey oversees the engineering team that handles all technical matters with the ships. He ticked off several key design or concept changes that have taken place.

“In 2010, we took out the volume search radar, the S-band sensor in the dual-band radar system, leaving the SPY-3 X-band radar, which received modifications from Raytheon to increase its volume-search capabilities. The system, installed for testing at Wallops Island, Virginia, will be tested next year on the self-defense test ship Paul F. Foster, which already has conducted a series of SPY-3 tests,” Downey said. Those earlier tests, he said, “went really well.”

A series of other changes enabled designers to take out about 50 tons from the deckhouse, Downey added, allowing the shift from composite construction to steel in the third ship of the class, the Lyndon B. Johnson. The second ship is named the Michael Monsoor.

Part of that weight reduction came from a change in the ship’s secondary gun system, used for close-in defense. Originally, the Mark 110 57mm gun was specified for the ship — the same weapon used as the primary gun system in littoral combat ships and Coast Guard national security cutters.

But Downey also saw the Mark 46 30mm gun, in use aboard San Antonio-class amphibious ships, as a contender for DDG 1000. The smaller gun, he said, “was half the weight, half the cost, and had more offensive combat capability” than the 57mm. “I asked the team to go back and relook at the gun issue.”

The analysis, he said, showed that the capability of the 57mm “was overstated in the model,” while the 30mm was understated. “They saw a system that did not meet the requirement anymore and one that did.”

A bonus, he pointed out, was a reduction of 24 tons by using the 30mm guns.

The size of the crew continues to be discussed. The ship is fitted with 186 racks, or berths, but the official crew size is 130, with another 28 people in the aviation detachment. Experience with other first-of-class deliveries, Downey said, could lead to a larger crew. The program already has laid out a crew organization with 17 additional crew members, for a crew total of 147, or 175 with the aviation detachment.

The added crew members, Downey said, would come in engineering ratings, gunnery, information systems technology, network and communications areas. A decision, he added, would need to be made in time to be included in the fiscal 2016 budget request.

Other racks have been provided for command and special operations teams. Originally, no flag — or command — facilities were to have been provided, but quarters for a destroyer squadron commodore and a small staff of six officers has been provided. A space able to accommodate 14 special operations team members and their gear is another feature of the ships.

The Zumwalts also were to have been led by an officer at the rank of commander, in line with all other destroyers. That has now changed, and a higher-ranking captain will drive the Zumwalts, on par with cruiser commands.

The ships, Downey explained, are a “pretty significant asset, with pretty complex capability, a very high level of training needed for the crew and officers and enlisted,” requiring a more senior officer to lead.

A decision on whether the 1000s would be a “fleet up” command, where the executive officer is expected to succeed the commanding officer, could also become a consideration. “With the complexity of the ship, that is something I would say should certainly be considered,” Downey said. “Nothing formal has been decided there, but that is, I think, a very real possibility.”

Budget/Cost iSsues and Summary:
The DDG 1000 program is phenomenally expensive — by the time the three ships are delivered, the Navy will have spent about $22 billion on research and development (R&D), procurement and construction, funded over more than 20 years. Planners early on envisioned 28 ships, then seven, then two and finally three — all from the same R&D pool. The Navy claimed the Zumwalts would cost an average of $3.3 billion each, but numerous critics warned they could hit $5 billion apiece or more.

So far at least, those predictions are not coming true, with costs for Zumwalt, Downey said, “around $3.4 billion.”

For the entire program, “I am 3 percent below the [cost] objective,” Downey claimed. “The objective is the low baseline number and the threshold is at the higher end.”

Sometime in the spring, Bath expects to take Zumwalt to sea for the first time, beginning a series of engineering and systems trials that would last through the summer, and the Navy hopes to receive Zumwalt before the end of 2015.

Even then, the ship won’t be complete, with elements of the combat system and computing environment still requiring work. But the time is coming when the hulking ship across Front Street will head down the Kennebec River, and the world will begin to see an entirely different kind of warship

I believe that the change to the 30mm gun away form the 57mm guns for the secondary gun system was a mistake. Yes, it saves wait and cost, but it sacrifices capability too, irrespective of them "getting on board," with the lighter, cheaper system. A decision was made, of course the Prgram Manager is going to be positive about it now that it has been made. but that does not mean that the 30mm is more capable than the 57mm.


Mk-46 30mm gun::
Fire Rate: Up to 200 rounds per minut
Max Range: 3 miles

Mk-110 57mm gun:
Fire Rate: 220 rounds per minute
Max Range: 10 miles

The numbers speak for themselves in terms of capability.

I am also am surprised that no anti-surface PGM has been developed for the AGS. They can certainly do so...and IMHHO, need to do so.
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Sikorsky S97 Raider

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!




Reminds me of the screw on a nuclear attack boat, steel if you don't pick this bird to replace that tired old "hind" as your avatar, I want it, and bd you can be my witness, but really steel, I will give you first pick, in fact bd, if steel doesn't want it, could you make any of these pics my avatar????? I like those rigid rotors, and as much as I normally hate contra-rotating main rotors, even on the black shark, these rigid rotors are no doubt composite and very stiff,,,, hence a very short lovely rotor mast for a contra bird, this thing will no doubt turn on a dime?? well I know it will turn on a dime!!!!!!!! so lets just use the good old exclaimation point!
 
Top