US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Nuclear power school is very difficult. But this cheating by these sailors is reprehensible.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


WASHINGTON - At least 34 sailors are being kicked out of the Navy for their roles in a cheating ring that operated undetected for at least seven years at a nuclear power training site, and 10 others are under criminal investigation, the admiral in charge of the Navy's nuclear reactors program told The Associated Press.

The number of accused and the duration of cheating are greater than was known when the Navy announced in February that it had discovered cheating on qualification exams by an estimated 20 to 30 sailors seeking to be certified as instructors at the nuclear training unit at Charleston, South Carolina. Students there are trained in nuclear reactor operations to prepare for service on any of the Navy's 83 nuclear-powered submarines and aircraft carriers.

Neither the instructors nor the students are involved in handling nuclear weapons.

After further investigation the Navy determined that 78 enlisted sailors were implicated. Although the cheating is believed to have been confined to a single unit at Charleston and apparently was not known to commanding officers, the misconduct had been happening since at least 2007, according to Adm. John M. Richardson, director of naval reactors. The exact start of the cheating was not pinpointed.

"There was never any question" that the reactors were being operated safely, he said in an AP interview, yet the cheating was a stunning violation of Navy ethics.

Richardson said he was "loaded for bear" at the outset of the investigation, unconvinced the cheating was confined to a single training unit. But he now believes that it had not spread, and that this was one reason that the ring managed to operate so long without being discovered.

In addition to the 34 enlisted sailors who were removed from the nuclear power program and are being administratively discharged from the Navy, two more who were implicated as "minimal" participants had their non-criminal punishment suspended due to their "strong potential for rehabilitation."

Also, 32 sailors were implicated by investigators but later exonerated by Richardson, and he gave one officer a verbal warning. The officer, whom Richardson declined to identify by name or rank, was not accused of participating in the cheating. He was faulted for "deficiencies" in his oversight of the exam program, but Richardson said this was not severe enough to merit punishment.

The 68 implicated sailors are in addition to the 10 whom Richardson said are believed to have been "at the centre" of the cheating ring and remain under investigation by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service.

The scandal rocked the Navy, but details until now had remained under wraps as senior Navy officials sought to determine the scope of the cheating — including whether it was happening elsewhere — as well as the root causes and possible remedies.

Unlike an Air Force exam-cheating scandal that came to light in January at a Montana base that operates land-based nuclear-armed missiles, the sailors involved in the Navy cheating had no responsibility for nuclear weapons.
 

HMS Astute

Junior Member
LRASM - Long Range Anti-Ship Missile
tza8vpP.jpg


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Nothing beats the AGM-129 ACM with its 3700+km range. :)

h04Mbh2.jpg
 

HMS Astute

Junior Member
Pentagon researches 'more mobile' hi-tech tank

The research arm of the US military is looking at designs for new hi-tech tanks, focusing less on armour and more on mobility and speed.

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) says it wants to "revolutionise" tank design.

The body says advancements in weaponry in recent years have made heavily armoured tanks less effective.

The next generation of tanks will instead be better able to avoid attacks in the first place.

"It's about breaking the 'more armour' paradigm and revolutionising protection for all armoured fighting vehicles," said Kevin Massey, Darpa program manager.

"Inspired by how X-plane programs have improved aircraft capabilities over the past 60 years, we plan to pursue groundbreaking fundamental research and development to help make future armoured fighting vehicles significantly more mobile, effective, safe and affordable."

The agency is planning to award contracts to companies and researchers in these fields over the coming months.

It expects new tanks to be more mobile and agile, allowing them to dodge attacks, cover all types of terrain and avoid detection.

The objective is to make tanks half the weight and twice as fast.

It also wants more technology for tank crews, with aids like driver assistance and automation of some functions, "similar to the capabilities found in modern commercial airplane cockpits".

Darpa says it hopes to start work on developing the new technology before April next year.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


bold text is permissible for headlines. Please do not use larger fonts. Thank you!
bd popeye super moderator
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Nothing beats the AGM-129 ACM with its 3700+km range. :)
The AGM-129 was an air launched cruise missile carried exclusively by the B-52H.

Each aircraft could carry 12 missiles externally and 8 in the rotary bay, or a total of 20 missiles.

All AGM-129s were decommissioned and destroyed in 2012.

The US still operates hundreds of AGM-86 misiles which has a range of over 2,400 km. The Bavo version is the nuclear variety. They are getting a SLEP to extend their life to 2030. The Charlie version is the conventional weapon, and the Delta is the penetator verion for deeply inbedded targets. The US maintains about 600 Cs and Ds, and about 530 Bs.

A new Long-Range Stand-Off (LRSO) missile development progam is on tract for award in 2018.
 
I woke up late today ... now a major Czech news-server informed (with one deriding comment included) about the unsuccessful attempt to rescue hostages, I used google:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


etc. and also:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(in Russian)

I mean what's the reason to talk to journalists about it?!
 

navyreco

Senior Member
Northrop Grumman Wins Full Deployment Contract for Next-Gen Tactical Afloat Network
GLCSYsB.jpg

The first CANES was installed on board Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS McCampbell (DDG 85) in November 2013
The U.S. Navy has selected Northrop Grumman Corporation as one of five contractors for the Consolidated Afloat Networks and Enterprise Services (CANES) full deployment production contract to upgrade cybersecurity, command and control, communications and intelligence (C4I) systems across the fleet. The indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity multiple award contract has a potential value of $2.5 billion over eight years.
...
The CANES program eliminates many legacy, standalone networks and provides a common computing environment for dozens of C4I applications. This strengthens the network infrastructure, improves security, reduces existing hardware footprint and decreases total ownership costs. The CANES effort enhances operational effectiveness and quality of life for deployed sailors.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
US Navy seeks nano-, small-sized UAVs
By: DAN PARSONSWASHINGTON DC Source: Flightglobal.com 19:43 20 Aug 2014
The US Navy has put out a call for small and "nano-sized", vertical take-off and landing unmanned air systems (UAS) for use by Marine infantry units to collect battlefield intelligence.
Col Eldon Metzger, the navy’s small tactical UAS programme manager, said in an email that the Marine Corps is “conducting a capabilities-based assessment on the future of small UAS technology that will provide day and night imagery of the tactical environment to troops at the battalion, company, or detachment level.”

Marines are looking for a man-portable UAS that can provide intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance in real time during the day and at night, in all weather conditions. The RFI specifically says the aircraft should operate in rocky, uneven, urban, forested and maritime environments where Marines routinely operate. Proposals are due by 1 September.

The service stresses the need for lightweight, easy-to-use systems that require minimal training or logistical tail and will not burden troops in the field. Unlike larger UAS, the navy is looking for a single system – aircraft, control station and information monitoring device – that can be carried in the field by a Marine.

Other attributes of the navy’s desired UAS include an electro-optical and/or infrared sensor payload that can provide real-time full motion video of a tactical landscape. The vertical takeoff and landing requirement includes the ability to launch and land within a “confined area” by either autonomous or manual means.

Jamie Cosgrove, a spokeswoman for Navy Air Systems Command, said small UAS, also designated Group I aircraft, are categorised as weighing less than 9.07kg (20lb). The RFI describes nano UAS as weighing between 2.27kg and 9.07kg, with a range of between 0.27nm (0.5km) and 2.7nm. It also should have a flight duration of between 15min and 45min, the document states.

The Navy currently has no nano UAS in its portfolio, Cosgrove said. Sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, California-based AeroVironment in 2011 finalised development of the Hummingbird nano UAS. The tiny UAS, which flies with the same mechanics as an actual hummingbird’s rapidly beating wings, can hover and project full-motion video to an operator with an onboard micro-camera. AeroVironment declined to comment for this story.

DARPA officials envisioned the Hummingbird could allow troops to peek at potential threats inside buildings or behind cover from a safe distance.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This reminds me....
US Army solicits nano-UAV concepts
By: ZACH ROSENBERGWASHINGTON DC Source: 22:49 3 Apr 2013
The US Army is soliciting technology concepts for a "cargo pocket" unmanned air vehicle (UAV), capable of providing "around the corner" tactical intelligence.

The solicitation requires only that concepts fit within certain size, weight and power requirements, and be capable of station-keeping - hovering - indoors and outside.

The US Army currently has no such technology deployed among field troops. British soldiers have recently sent to Afghanistan the Prox Dynamics Black Hornet, pocket-sized rotary-wing UAV, which they have operated with rave reviews.

Similar concepts from US companies have included everything from a miniature quad-rotor to a live beetle controlled via electric brain stimulation.

The Army did not immediately respond to questions.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I wonder if they can joint.

US Navy poised for UCLASS bidding after unmanned demo
By: STEPHEN TRIMBLE Source: Flightglobal.com 01:41 20 Aug 2014
Two aircraft – an unmanned Northrop Grumman X-47B and the Boeing F/A-18C Hornet – launched and landed on the USS Theodore Roosevelt multiple times on 17 and 18 August, validating a decade-long, on-and-off quest to prove such a pairing is possible on a carrier deck.

Operating fixed-wing unmanned aircraft side-by-by side with manned fighters from a carrier deck was first conceived with the US Navy’s short-lived mid-range endurance programme of the late-1990s. The challenge was then passed to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, but the joint unmanned combat air systems programme was cancelled in 2006.

Eight years later with more than $1.5 billion spent, the navy finally operated a Hornet and Northrop’s cranked-kite unmanned air vehicle aboard the Roosevelt – the graduation exercise of the unmanned combat air systems-demonstration (UCAS-D) programme.

“What you saw today was history – history in the making,” said Rear Adm Mathias Winter, programme executive officer of Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR), addressing a group of reporters who witnessed the first catapult and trap of manned and unmanned aircraft.

asset image
With the demonstration now largely complete, the navy is poised now to take the next step. The competitive phase of an acquisition programme estimated to cost between $3-$6 billion could begin by mid-September, Winter says.

The unmanned carrier launched airborne surveillance and strike (UCLASS) programme will solicit bids from Boeing, General Atomics Aeronautics Systems, Lockheed Martin and Northrop, with the goal of developing a carrier-based, tailless, unmanned aircraft that can evade radar, collect intelligence and launch weapons.

The Defense Acquisition Board – a panel of senior US military and civilian leaders – has a meeting scheduled on 10 September, Winter says. Their authorization will allow NAVAIR to release the request for proposals, with bids due in 60 days, he says.

As one of the few new weapons acquisition programmes available for bidding, UCLASS has received great attention from inside and outside the military. As an all-new capability with no manned equivalent in operation today, UCLASS also has invited controversy, with industry officials, the intelligence community, naval aviators and Congress expressing a diverse range of opinions over how such a system should be operated.

asset image
Several key aspects of the UCLASS force remain unknown. Winter acknowledges the navy does not know if the UCLASS fleet will operate as a standalone unit or as an adjunct to a manned fighter squadron or a detachment of Northrop E-2D Hawkeyes.

On the other hand, Winter emphasises that operational requirements for the UCLASS aircraft have remained stable despite the uncertainty and controversy. The bidders will be asked to design an aircraft that can take-off from a carrier and maintain a constant surveillance orbit up to 600nm (1,110km) away.

More controversially, the navy has diluted the penetrating capability of the UCLASS fleet. The selected aircraft will be required to operate in unchallenged airspace, with the capability to “grow” into a long-range, stealthy, penetrating aircraft, Winter says.

The two X-47Bs used in the UCAS-D programme were never intended to serve in an operational role, but the navy is trying to keep it beyond the demonstration. One option under review is to add the X-47Bs to the VX-23 squadron, the navy’s flight test unit, Winter says. If approved, the move would allow the aircraft to serve as testbeds for new technologies in development by NAVAIR or other research and acquisition centers, he says.

Until then, the X-47Bs may still have a role to play in the UCAS-D programme. The navy has not determined whether it needs a sixth carrier deployment next year to collect more data.

asset image
Winter described the demonstration on 17-18 August as a “floating laboratory” that presented unique challenges. In fact, the X-47B assigned to perform the demonstration took off from NAS Patuxent River in Maryland early on 17 August, but had to turn back because of a fuel pump failure.

The back-up aircraft was already onboard the Roosevelt’s deck, but its initial launch off the carrier was delayed. As the nose-wheel was moved into the shuttle connecting the aircraft to the ship’s steam-driven catapult, the deck angle off the ship was measured as slightly negative, meaning the aircraft may not generate enough lift to get airborne after leaving the deck.

The ship’s captain pumped fuel aft and re-arranged hardware in the hangar bay, allowing the bow of the ship’s deck to return to level.

In all, the two X-47Bs completed three of four planned testing periods over the two-day period, according to the navy.

(Photos by Stephen Trimble)
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

GAO: Pentagon broke law in Bergdahl swap
Aug. 21, 2014 - 05:48PM |
7 Comments

A
A
Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl prepares to be interviewed by Army investigators.
Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl prepares to be interviewed by Army investigators. (Eugene R. Fidell / AP)

By Chuck Vinch
Staff writer
FILED UNDER
News
Congress & DOD
Related Links
More time given for Bergdahl disappearance probe
Report: Bergdahl's platoon mates seek book, movie deal
Joint Chiefs all backed Bergdahl prisoner swap
The Defense Department broke the law when it transferred five Taliban detainees from the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to Qatar in exchange for former prisoner of war Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, the Government Accountability Office said Thursday.

In a seven-page opinion, the GAO said a provision of the 2014 Defense Appropriations Act bars defense officials from using taxpayer funds to transfer any prisoner from Guantanamo unless the secretary of defense gives Congress at least 30 days’ advance notice.

The Pentagon made the transfer May 31. In response to the GAO legal opinion, defense officials acknowledged that Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel sent written and telephonic notice to congressional leaders on May 31 and June 1 and 2.

Also, because appropriated funds were used to carry out the transfer when no money was expressly available for that purpose, the legal opinion said DoD violated the Antideficiency Act, which bars federal agencies from incurring obligations that exceed an amount approved by Congress in an appropriation. The Pentagon spent just under $1 million on the prisoner exchange, according to the GAO.

Defense officials argued that the transfer was lawful in the context of the executive branch’s constitutional obligations in “protecting the lives of Americans abroad and protecting U.S. service members.”

At a House Armed Services Committee hearing in June less than two weeks after the Bergdahl swap, Hagel said the administration was unable to notify Congress in advance because it was an “extraordinary situation” with a “unique set of dynamics.”

“First, we weren’t certain that we would transfer those detainees out of Guantanamo until we had Sgt. Bergdahl in hand,” Hagel said. “Second, we had Sgt. Bergdahl in hand only a few hours after making the final arrangements. I would never sign any document or make any agreement, agree to any decision, that I did not feel was in the best interest of this country. Nor would the president of the United States, who made the final decision with the full support of his national security team.”

In its new legal opinion, the GAO disagreed. “In our view, DoD has dismissed the significance of the express language” in the relevant provision of the 2014 Defense Appropriations Act that calls for DoD to meet the notification requirement before using taxpayer funds for a prisoner transfer. To read the provision any other way, the GAO said, “would render the notification requirement meaningless.”

The GAO opinion is already renewing criticism of the prisoner exchange among lawmakers. Both Democrats and Republicans in Congress were angered by the deal, with some saying the cost was too high, and others expressing concern that the exchange could end up jeopardizing the lives of U.S. troops in Afghanistan. Still others likened the deal to negotiating with terrorists, although the White House worked the swap through the government of Qatar.

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, released a statement late Thursday in which she said the GAO opinion “confirms my belief that the administration violated the law when it released and transferred these dangerous Taliban detainees without notifying Congress as the law clearly and unequivocally requires.”

“It is highly likely that these men will return to the fight against our country after their year in Qatar — that is the assessment of the administration’s own intelligence experts,” Collins said.

She claimed that “dozens” of administration officials knew about the swap well in advance. “It simply doesn’t make sense that members of Congress, particularly the leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee, were not informed. It’s not hard to imagine that the President didn’t notify us until after the fact because he knew the proposed transfer would have been met with opposition. The President’s decision is part of a disturbing pattern where he unilaterally decides that he does not have to comply with provisions of laws with which he disagrees.”

Bergdahl, 28, is still under investigation by the Army for leaving his unit in Afghanistan five years ago. He is in a “holding pattern” doing administrative duties at Fort Sam Houston in San Antonio, according to his attorney, Eugene Fidell, a military justice expert.

The Army has extended the time line of its investigation. “It is possible that [Bergdahl] will have to follow up on issues that may require additional witness interviews,” the Army said in a statement earlier this week.

The investigation is now expected to wrap up some time in September.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



p8-08.jpg


Fox News said:
A Chinese jet fighter flew dangerously close to a U.S. Navy P-8 anti-submarine warfare aircraft near Japan this week in an encounter that highlights China’s continued aggressiveness in the region.

The P-8, a new, militarized Boeing-737 anti-submarine warfare aircraft, was conducting routine surveillance of the Chinese coast over the East China Sea on Monday when the incident occurred, said U.S. defense officials familiar with reports of the encounter.

Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Jeffrey Pool had no immediate comment but said he would provide “an explanation of the event” on Friday.

The defense officials said the Chinese Su-27 interceptor jet flew within 50 feet of the P-8 and then carried out a barrel roll over the top of the aircraft—a move described by officials as dangerous and meant to threaten the surveillance aircraft.

It was the second threatening encounter of a U.S. surveillance aircraft this year. In April, a Russian Su-27 flew within 100 feet of a U.S. Air Force RC-135 aircraft during another dangerous intercept over waters north of Japan.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Northrop Unveils XS-1 Spaceplane Design For Darpa
Aug 19, 2014 Graham Warwick | AWIN First
EMAIL
INSHARE



COMMENTS 3

Northrop Grumman has unveiled its vertical-launch, horizontal-landing reusable booster design for the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency’s (Darpa) XS-1 experimental spaceplane program.

Northrop, teamed with subsidiary Scaled Composites and Virgin Galactic, is working under a 13-month, $3.9 million Phase 1 preliminary-design contract, awarded in July. Contracts also went to Boeing with Blue Origin, and Masten Space Systems with XCOR Aerospace.

Northrop’s unmanned spaceplane is launched vertically from a transporter/erector/launcher, in a "clean pad"-operation with minimum infrastructure and ground crew. The spaceplane is designed for highly autonomous flight operations, the company says.

The reusable first stage would accelerate to Mach 10 or beyond and release an expendable upper stage designed to carry a 3,000-lb.-class payload into low Earth orbit, then return to a horizontal landing and recovery on a standard runway.

Key goals of the XS-1 flight demonstration are to fly 10 times in 10 days, exceed Mach 10 at least once and launch a small payload into orbit. Darpa’s target is to reduce the cost of access to space for 3,000-5,000-lb. payloads to less than $5 million per flight.

Under Phase 1, the three teams will evaluate the technical feasibility of the program goals, explore alternative technical approaches and assess potential suitability for near-term transition of the reusable spaceplane to military, commercial and civil users.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top