US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



7091474743_c86698d236_c.jpg


NavalToday said:
Huntington Ingalls Industries announced yesterday that its Ingalls Shipbuilding division has received a $497 million fixed-price, incentive-fee contract from the U.S. Coast Guard to build a seventh Legend-class National Security Cutter (WMSL 756).

Ingalls has delivered the first three NSCs and has three more under construction. Hamilton (WMSL 753) is 81 percent complete and will deliver in the third quarter of 2014; James (WMSL 754) is 52 percent complete and will launch in April, and the sixth NSC (WMSL 755) began construction late last year and is scheduled for launch in the fourth quarter of 2015. The seventh ship, WMSL 756, is scheduled for delivery in 2018.

Legend-class NSCs are the flagships of the Coast Guard’s cutter fleet. Designed to replace the 378‐foot Hamilton-class high-endurance cutters that entered service during the 1960s, they are 418 feet long with a 54-foot beam and displace 4,500 tons with a full load. They have a top speed of 28 knots, a range of 12,000 miles, an endurance of 60 days and a crew of 110.

NSCs are capable of meeting all maritime security mission needs required of the high-endurance cutter. They include an aft launch and recovery area for two rigid hull inflatable boats and a flight deck to accommodate a range of manned and unmanned rotary wing aircraft. The Legend class is the largest and most technologically advanced class of cutter in the Coast Guard, with robust capabilities for maritime homeland security, law enforcement, marine safety, environmental protection and national defense missions. NSCs play an important role enhancing the Coast Guard’s operational readiness, capacity and effectiveness at a time when the demand for their services has never been greater.

The fourth Legend Class cutter, USCGC Hamilton, WMSL-753, was christened in October of 2013.


[video=youtube;aXzydSw1Y6A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXzydSw1Y6A[/video]

The fifth cutter, USCGC James, WMSL-754, will launch this spring. The sixth vessel, USCGC Munro, WMSL-755, began building in Cotober 2013 after the Hamilton was launched.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
I just pulled this off Military.com
Navy Makes Plans for New Destroyer for 2030s
Share on facebook
1.9K
Share on twitterShare on google_plusone_shareShare on more110 comments
arleigh burke 600x400
Military.comApr 09, 2014 | by Kris Osborn
The U.S. Navy is in the very early stages of developing a new destroyer -- called the Future Surface Combatant -- which will replace the existing Arleigh Burke-class destroyers and enter service by the early 2030s, Navy leaders told Military.com.
Navy officials said it is much too early to speculate on hull design or shape for the new ship but lasers, on-board power-generation systems, increased automation, next-generation weapons, sensors and electronics are all expected to figure prominently in the development of the vessel.
The Future Surface Combatant will succeed and serve alongside the Navy's current Flight III DDG 51 Arleigh Burke-class destroyer program slated to being construction in 2016. Overall, the Secretary of the Navy's long-range shipbuilding plan calls for construction of 22 Flight III DDGs, Navy officials said.
There are a handful of early emerging requirements regarding what admirals want for the ship, Rear Adm. Tom Rowden, director of surface warfare, told Military.com in an interview.
"I could not even draw a picture for you," said Rowden, who went on to explain that greater automation and integrated electrical power are part of the calculus of early discussions.

He emphasized that the new ship will leverage successful next-generation technologies already underway in other platforms such as the DDG 1000 destroyer, Littoral Combat Ship and Ford-class aircraft carriers.
The Future Surface Combatant may draw from the DDG 1000's high-tech electric drive system that propels the ship while generating 58 megawatts of on-board electrical power. On-board power will be in high demand as lasers and directed energy weapons become more prominent, Rowden said.
"We are moving all ahead with respect to the development of lasers as a weapon in the future. You can take the power that is generated on the ship and convert that into a fire control solution without having to shoot a missile that may cost a million to ten million," Rowden explained.
In fact, low-cost laser weapons are a way to help stay ahead of the cost curve on future destroyers, he added.
"One of the things I am concerned about is if our enemy can develop a million dollar missile but we have to shoot ten million dollars worth of missiles in order to ensure that they don't inflict damage on our ship – we're on the wrong side of the cost curve," he said.
Navy leaders will emphasize lethality and survivability as initial requirements are developed for the new destroyer. Rowden explained that the new destroyer will, among other things, be tasked with protecting America's aircraft carriers.
The largest aspect of emphasis for the nascent Future Surface Combatant program is something Rowden called modularity, a term referring to a technological ability to rapidly and effectively make adjustments as needed.
The new ship design will emphasize flexibility to ensure the platform keeps pace with fast-moving technological change and threats, he said.
"You have to understand that in order to maintain the relevance of the combat system, you have to have a combat system that can evolve with the threat. If you integrate the ship so tightly that you have to take the ship apart in order to integrate the combat system -- then that adds significant cost to maintaining the relevance of the ship," Rowden said.
This approach is designed to ensure the platform keeps pace with emerging innovations in weaponry, electronics, computing and sensors.
"The modules that we install in the ship may have no bearing or resemblance to what needs to be there when we decommission the ship. The weapons and sensors will be different. We have to think about how to move through the design, manufacture and subsequent upgrades in the most cost-effective and affordable fashion. We need to design that into the ship," he said.
-- Kris Osborn can be reached at [email protected]

So then a New Detroyer is in the Works


Seahawk cancellations threaten multi-year deal, Sikorsky warns
By: JON HEMMERDINGERWASHINGTON DC Source: an hour ago
The US military's budget request for fiscal year 2015 includes cuts to a number of aircraft programmes, but Sikorsky and analysts call one item unique – the proposed cancellation of orders for 29 MH-60R Seahawks under a multi-year contract.

If approved by Congress, such a move would raise broad concerns about the surety of other contractors’ multi-year procurement deals, and affect orders for UH-60 Black Hawks from the US Army and some foreign partners under the same contract.

"I don’t believe a multi-year contract has ever been cancelled early,” says Tim Healy, Sikorsky's director of maritime programmes. “It’s a big deal for the country.”

"An actual [multi-year procurement] cancellation would be unprecedented," says Richard Aboulafia, vice president of Teal Group.

Healy says Sikorsky is "very concerned" about the US Navy's intentions, noting that multi-year contracts allow companies to reduce costs by investing in infrastructure, processes and staff with confidence in being paid over many years. Sikorsky sells Black Hawks ordered through multi-year deals at a 10% discount over those in single-year contracts, he notes.

A cancellation would reduce “the confidence industry has to invest in cost-reduction,” Healy says. That could result in higher industry costs, which would be passed on to taxpayers, he adds. Cancellations are allowed under the contract terms, but result in termination penalties.

Aboulafia says those penalties tend to make "cancellation prohibitively expensive. That way, all the contractors involved feel confident that they can invest in the future, and keep costs down."

asset image
US Navy

The contract in question calls for the USN, US Army and foreign partners to acquire roughly 650 Black Hawks and Seahawks between fiscal years 2012 and 2016. In its FY2015 budget request, the navy proposes cancelling the last 29 aircraft to be purchased in FY2016.

The move results largely from broad military spending cuts.

USN H-60 programme manager Capt James Glass says it also reflects proposals to retire the aircraft carrier USS George Washington and an ongoing study of the navy's littoral mission.

"I have concern [a Seahawk cancellation] will impact industry long-term," Glass said during the Navy League's Sea-Air-Space Exposition near Washington, DC. "We are still trying to quantify that impact."

A Seahawk cancellation could also affect about 60 US Army Black Hawks and at least two MH-60Rs ordered by Denmark under the same contract, Healy says. “You cannot cancel one service's part of the contract," he says, adding that Sikorsky is in continuing discussions with the military and that the ultimate impact is unknown.

The army confirms that without the 29 navy aircraft the contract with Sikorsky would not have "sufficient quantities in FY2016 to meet a contract minimum buy requirement". The result, it adds, would be "a contract termination with Sikorsky."

The issue is now largely in the hands of Congress, which must approve the navy's plans.

Aboulafia calls USN's proposal a "game of chicken", and "a plea to Congress to insert the cash." But if Congress doesn't blink, "the navy might well need to either re-instate the contract or pay high cancellation fees," he says.
Sikorsky attaches rotors to CH-53K ground test vehicle
By: JON HEMMERDINGERWASHINGTON DC Source: Flightglobal.com 18 hours ago
Sikorsky has attached main rotor blades to its CH-53K ground test vehicle (GTV) and will soon attach the tail rotor blades, according to officials from the company and the US Marine Corps.

The programme is on track to turn the rotors using the aircraft's GE38-1B turboshaft engines – the so-called "shakedown light-off" tests — by the end of the month, says Michael Torok, Sikorsky’s vice president of the programme.

Torok made his comments during a press briefing at the Navy League's Sea-Air-Space Exposition near Washington, DC, on 9 April.

He adds that development is progressing well on the heavy-lift helicopter, with first flight still scheduled for sometime near the end of this year.

The aircraft that will be making the first flight is nearly completed, though the company must still conduct tests of the main gear box, says Torok.

asset image
CH-53K ground test vehicle at Sikorsky's facility near West Palm Beach, Florida. Sikorsky.

USMC Col Robert Pridgen, CH-53K programme manager, says Sikorsky and the military are seeking foreign customers, with potential customers including Germany and Israel, and he predicts interest will further materialise following first flight and as the company moves to production.

Officials say they have also received interest from international partners in the Asia Pacific region.

"Build it and they will come," Pridgen says.

The company has been testing the CH-53K’s seven main all-composite rotor blades and its four tail rotor blades at its headquarters in Stratford, Connecticut.

In December 2013, Sikorsky first powered up the GTV’s auxiliary power unit in Florida as part of the “bare-head light-off” tests of the engines and rotor without blades.

The GTV’s three main engines were started in January.

Despite similarities to the CH-53E Super Stallion, the CH-53K's three turbines can crank out 7,500shp each, compared with the 4,380shp GE T64 powerplants on the legacy platform.

The main and rail rotors have more surface area than the E-model, and a newly designed gearbox will allow the CH-53K to carry an external load of more than 12,200kg (26,900lb) over a mission radius of 110nm (204km).

That is triple the capacity of the E-model, according to Sikorsky.
CH53K Hyper Stallion
 
Last edited:

richardparker07

New Member
Navy researchers at the US Naval Research Laboratory's (NRL) Materials Science and Technology Division have successfully conducted flight trials of a scale-model WWII craft powered by novel-liquid hydrocarbon fuel.

An interesting Research

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
CVN-73 forward deployed is also facing the axe we will know in 2016

Actually present plans call for USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) to replace CVN-73 in Japan in 2016.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Of course all of this is subject to change..

The USN has had a carrier forward deployed in Yokosuka Japan since 05 October 1973 when USS Midway (CVA 41) arrived in Japan..

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Actually present plans call for USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) to replace CVN-73 in Japan in 2016.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Having the "Gipper," and its strike group forward deployed will be a very good thing. She's a great carrier.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


At the same time, it would be nice to see the facilities in Guam upgraded to the point where the US could, if so desired, forward deploy a second carrier to the WESPAC.

Two in the Western Pacific, one in Hawaii, and three on the West Coast would be my preference. Hehehe...but it ain't my call.
 
Last edited:
...

It would be able to house the DBR which is going on the Ford Class carriers and have all the room and power it needs to be able to fully exploit it. Then it would have massive room for VLS cells. In addition to making a strong BMD vessel for use off of the US Coasts or allied coasts, IMHO it would be a GREAT vessel to have as an arsenal ship along with any carrier strike group or amphibious ready group.

Posted on InsideDefense.com: April 10, 2014

Huntington Ingalls Industries executives will meet later this month with the Missile Defense Agency to discuss a new ballistic missile defense ship concept based on an LPD Flight II hull design, a capability the shipbuilder believes could contribute to Ballistic Missile Defense System improvements being considered by the Pentagon for the early 2020s.

Steve Sloan, Ingalls' business development director for LPD programs, said the company pitched the BMD ship concept -- which features space for a radar twice as large as those on current missile-defense destroyers and cruisers -- to MDA on April 1 in response to a solicitation last month to support a BMDS sensor study.

"We responded to the RFI and will meet with MDA one-on-one shortly," Sloan told InsideDefense.com on April 8 during the Navy League's annual convention in Maryland.

On March 14, MDA asked industry for ideas to support government efforts to identify "potential discriminating sensor options, architectural innovations, and lessons learned that could be applied to the future BMDS sensor network."

Industry responses will "inform future sensor architecture planning and technology development investments," according to MDA. The agency is interested in "options that are presented in the context of an overall mixed sensor architecture, potentially consisting of land, sea, airborne and space elements with allocated responsibilities."

MDA is looking for technologies sufficiently mature to be fielded between 2020 and 2025 and has set a series of principles to guide development of a new sensor architecture roadmap, including "maximum exploitation of non-BMD assets for BMD applications" and "no dead-end engineering that blocks extension to evolving threats and countermeasures."

MDA plans to meet one-on-one with respondents on April 23 and April 24, according to the solicitation.

Ingalls, a division of Huntington Ingalls Industries, has designed the LPD Flight II hull with an eye toward extending production once the Navy's planned acquisition of the San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock ship ends. Last summer, the keel was laid for the Portland (LPD-27), the 11th ship of the class and last of the original program of record. Congress has appropriated initial funding for LPD-28 in FY-14, but the Navy has not released funding.

The shipyard believes its Flight II hull design could be used for a wide range of missions, including an LX(R) replacement for the current LSD-41 and LSD-49 fleets, a hospital ship, a humanitarian operations ship or a joint command and control ship.

"We recognized that we had all this space to make a ballistic missile defense ship," Sloan said. "If you look at the ship, it is capable of holding a very large radar array."

The Spy-1 radar in today's Aegis destroyers have a 12-foot array; the planned Air and Missile Defense Radar for the new Flight III destroyer will have a 14-foot array.

"This is a 25-foot radar array," said Sloan. "And you have the ability to go to a 35-foot radar array."

A larger radar, paired with a combat system, could allow the ship to detect and maintain a continuous track on ballistic missiles, whereas Aegis ships lose track at about 250 miles, he said.

"So this is a force multiplier because you could station this ship if you were in a Western Pacific defense scenario, you could put this ship east of Japan, have it looking west and not require as many Aegis ships in the Sea of Japan," Sloan said. "It would extend the coverage of those ships."

The notional concept of operations, he added, would envision allowing the LPD ballistic missile defense ship to detect and track a missile and -- utilizing the "engage on remote" capability the Navy is developing -- direct either guided-missile destroyers or cruisers in the best position to fire on the target.

"So it frees up the number of ships in the Sea of Japan to do the mission," he added.

Ingalls, which Sloan said had developed the BMD ship concept long before the MDA solicitation last month, has told the agency that one of these ships could be placed off the East Coast of the United States in the North Atlantic, or in the North Pacific to defend Seattle and San Francisco.

The currently deployed Ballistic Missile Defense System is primarily oriented toward threats from North Korea and Iran.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Navy Today said:
The U.S. Navy will christen the future USS Zumwalt (DDG 1000) on April 12, during a ceremony at General Dynamics-Bath Iron Works shipyard in Bath, Maine.

The lead ship and class are named in honor of former Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Admiral Elmo R. “Bud” Zumwalt Jr., who served as the 19th CNO from 1970-1974.

Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus will deliver the ceremony’s principal address. In accordance with Navy tradition, the ship’s co-sponsors Ann Zumwalt and Mouzetta Zumwalt-Weathers, daughters of Zumwalt, will break a bottle of sparkling wine across the ship’s bow.

SECNAV said:
The christening of the future USS Zumwalt represents the beginning of another era of service for this great name.

Just as Admiral Elmo R. “Bud” Zumwalt helped shape our nation’s Navy as the 19th chief of naval operations, DDG 1000 will help shape the future of surface combatants. The sophisticated new technology incorporated aboard this ship, combined with its multi-mission capabilities, will ensure it is a relevant and integral part of our battle force for years to come. This day, however, would not be possible without the hard work and dedication of the hundreds of men and women of our nation’s industrial base who worked so diligently to help us reach this exciting moment.”

The Zumwalt-class destroyer represents the next-generation of multi-mission surface combatants and will enable access in the open ocean, littoral and ashore. The Navy has procured three Zumwalt-class destroyers.

The ship includes new technologies that deliver capability now and serve as a springboard for incorporation into future ship classes. DDG 1000 is the first U.S. Navy surface combatant to employ an innovative and highly survivable Integrated Power System which will provide power to propulsion, ship’s service, and combat system loads from the same gas turbine prime movers. DDG 1000′s power allocation flexibility allows for potentially significant energy savings and is well-suited to enable future high energy weapons and sensors.

The ship features two advanced gun systems firing long-range land attack projectiles that reach up to 63 nautical miles, providing precision, high volume and persistent fire support to forces ashore, along with an approximate five-fold improvement in naval surface fire range. DDG 1000 will employ active and passive sensors and a multi-function radar capable of conducting area air surveillance, including over-land, throughout the extremely difficult and cluttered sea-land interface.

Construction on Zumwalt commenced in February 2009, with the keel laying ceremony held in November 2011, and ship launch successfully completed in October 2013. Zumwalt is 610 feet long is with a displacement of more than 15,000 tons when fully loaded. The ship is expected to join the fleet in 2016.
 
Last edited:

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
Having the "Gipper," and its strike group forward deployed will be a very good thing. She's a great carrier.


At the same time, it would be nice to see the facilities in Guam upgraded to the point where the US could, if so desired, forward deploy a second carrier to the WESPAC.

Two in the Western Pacific, one in Hawaii, and three on the West Coast would be my preference. Hehehe...but it ain't my call.

This is what I think is coming

USN right now keeps roughly four carrier fleet operational at anyone time one forward deployed one in the Persian Gulf (Iran) one in the Pacific and one in the Atlantic and a similar number of assault ships

They cut from four to two and withdraw CSG from Atlantic and Mediterranean, this job will be covered more and more by RN once they get two carriers operational

USN will keep CSG in Persian Gulf and Pacific they won't cut them

The bridge in numbers will be made up by RN, JMSDF and RAN

Cus let's be honest Australia will be able to muster a force of a marine expeditionary unit once both LHD and 3 x AEGIS DDG are operational

Sequestration will cut operational deployments but not operational capability

Until 2020 we see a reduction then post 2020 USN builds back up the 300 ship navy
 
Top