US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
to a point yes. Virginia is targeted to take the title of the USN's backbone Attack Submarine. but with way more missions for Virginia which is built not just to patrol the sea but get in close to enemy coasts and sit there deploying SF, Launching missiles and causing all kinds fun for the enemy.
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
If we can replace the LA boats with the Virginias on a one on one basis the USN will definitely be able to maintain undersea superiority for the next 25 yrs to come to come. The next generation of SSNs (after the Virginia) is no doubt probably in the drawings as we speak.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
It sounds like it will be a improved Virginia

[video=youtube_share;NmsFSG0xXRc]http://youtu.be/NmsFSG0xXRc[/video]
PEO Soldier NETT warrior
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
to a point yes. Virginia is targeted to take the title of the USN's backbone Attack Submarine. but with way more missions for Virginia which is built not just to patrol the sea but get in close to enemy coasts and sit there deploying SF, Launching missiles and causing all kinds fun for the enemy.
Personally, I believe they need to get the new dry SEAL delivery system worked out so they can deliver SEALs from a good distance out, like 50 miles.

Getting a large nuclear boat in closer to hostile shores is asking for trouble IMHO. SSKs, particularly the AIP variety are simply too good these days.

But, from a better stand off range, it is not a bad mission.

Upgrading later blocks by lengthening them and making SSGNs out of them makes a lot of sense. 40 SLCMs will be a good number to spread out over numerous vessel, without them having to sacrifice any of their attack capabilities.

Yes, I expect they will end up building at least 30 more of them over then next 15-20 years. They will serve for a long time, as they are being improved as they go.
 

thunderchief

Senior Member
Army: Don’t say Christmas

Don’t say Christmas.

That’s the message that was conveyed to a group of soldiers at Camp Shelby by an equal opportunity officer from the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute, according to a soldier who attended a recent briefing.

“It’s unbelievable that the Army would ban ‘Christmas’ like it’s a bad word,” said Michael Berry, an attorney with the Liberty Institute, a legal firm representing the unidentified soldier.

Two weeks ago, a routine meeting was held at the Mississippi base with various leaders of the 158th Infantry Brigade. During the meeting, they discussed an upcoming Christmas football tournament. The equal opportunity officer immediately objected to the usage of the word “Christmas.”

“Our equal opportunity representative stopped the briefing and told us that we can’t say Christmas,” the soldier told me. “Almost the entire room blew up. Everybody was frustrated. The equal opportunity rep told our commander that not everyone celebrates Christmas and we couldn’t say Christmas celebration. It had to be holiday celebration.”

The soldier said there was a brief, but heated discussion about political correctness. At one point, the equal opportunity representative tried to deflect the criticism by pointing out it was the Army’s rules – not hers.

“She said an individual can say Christmas, but as an organization in the Army you can’t say Christmas,” the soldier told me.

So what does the Army have to say about the DEOMI officer’s edict?

“There is no policy at the 158th Infantry Brigade, First Army Division East or First Army that forbids using the word ‘Christmas’,” Public Affairs Chief Amanda Glenn told me.

She confirmed that there was a discussion in the meeting about the football tournament. She said it was meant to be a team building event and it had no tie to a specific religious event or holiday celebration.

“The Equal Opportunity advisor simply stated that it would be more appropriate to call it a holiday football event,” she said.

But Attorney Berry tells me that it was made very clear to the soldiers in the room that the name change was not merely a suggestion.

“She stated that the word Christmas had to be replaced with the word holiday,” Berry said.

The soldier who contacted me said it was just another instance of the military trying to curtail public expressions of the Christian faith.

“Between the Air Force and the Army – it’s like they don’t like Christian values, they don’t like the word Christ or Christmas,” the soldier said. “They don’t like you talking about it.”

Berry said it’s a shame that the Army has implemented word police.

“Are they going to have the ‘Merry Christmas’ police going around issuing citations to an soldier who slips and says the word?” he wondered. “They’re treating Christmas like it’s pornography. As a matter of fact, the Army actually treats pornography better than it does Christmas.”

It’s not the first time Equal Opportunity officers have caused trouble at Camp Shelby. Earlier this year, I reported exclusively about a briefing at Camp Shelby that labeled the American Family Association as a domestic hate group.

After my story was published, the Secretary of the Army ordered military leaders to halt all briefings on extremist organizations that labeled Evangelical Christian ministries as domestic hate groups.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


What a hell is a "equal opportunity officer" ? :confused: Is this something like political commissar in Soviet army ?
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


What a hell is a "equal opportunity officer" ? :confused: Is this something like political commissar in Soviet army ?
That's the "political correctness" officer...or, just shorten it to a name more commonly used in other places around the world..."political officer".

We didn't need those types of blokes for well over 200 years...we don't need them now.

As the higher level officer said, there is no regulation against members of the military using the word, Christmas. IMHO, this was that women's attempt to try and stamp her desires and understanding, and maybe that of a few people around and above her, onto that meeting.
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


What a hell is a "equal opportunity officer" ? :confused: Is this something like political commissar in Soviet army ?


That comrade is exactly what it is, furthermore expect further "wussification", eeerrrrrrrr "feminization" of the military from top to bottom, (mods feel free to edit, brat is NOT very PC), the military is "purging" flag officers of "old school". Yep, when the BHO team finishes their top to bottom scrubbing, the only one in danger on the planet will be those bigoted "Christians", MERRY CHRISTMAS Comrade! comrade brat
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


story by Phil Stewart and Missy Ryan 17 hours ago

By Phil Stewart and Missy Ryan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. military on Monday deployed about 150 Marines to a base in the Horn of Africa to prepare for possible further evacuations of American citizens from the deepening conflict in South Sudan, U.S. officials said on Monday.

The deployment of a special crisis-response team of Marines, who are normally stationed at Moron Air Base in Spain, follows a thwarted evacuation attempt in South Sudan over the weekend in which four U.S. soldiers were wounded by gunfire.

Three U.S. officials, speaking to Reuters on condition of anonymity, said the Marines were sent to a base in Djibouti, a move that would allow them to deploy to South Sudan more quickly, if asked.

Colonel Steve Warren, a Pentagon spokesman, said earlier in the day that the U.S. repositioning of troops would allow for possible "evacuations and the security associated with an evacuation," should the State Department make such a request.

South Sudan's government said on Monday it would start a major offensive to retake two strategic towns controlled by rebels loyal to former Vice President Riek Machar.

On Saturday, four U.S. service members were wounded when their military aircraft were hit by ground fire as they attempted to evacuate U.S. citizens from the South Sudanese town of Bor. U.S. citizens and other foreigners were later evacuated from the same area a day later.

So far, about 380 U.S. officials and private U.S. citizens have been evacuated from South Sudan, according to the State Department. It is unclear how many U.S. citizens still are left in the country because many do not register with the U.S. Embassy when they enter the country.

President Barack Obama told Congress in a weekend letter that "approximately 46 additional U.S. military personnel" had been deployed by aircraft on Saturday to evacuate Americans.

Warren said three of the U.S. injured troops, all of whom took gunshot fire to their lower extremities during the attempted evacuation, were expected to be evacuated from Nairobi, where they have been treated, to a U.S. military medical center in Germany later on Monday.

The fourth service member was not yet stable enough to be moved, Warren said. He was being cared for by a specialized team that arrived in Nairobi over the weekend.

"We expect he'll be evacuated as soon as his condition stabilizes," Warren said.

(Reporting by Phil Stewart and Missy Ryan; Editing by Andrew Hay and Bill Trott)
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

might not even need to send the minisub all the way into a enemy shoreline Jeff.
Good for small groups...but it also seems bulky and is probably very expensive.

I just do not see an entire squad being outfitted with such devices. And since they are meant to replace finning, what happens when one malfunctions? Does the guy just have to swim the rest of the way? What is the range? My bet it is far less than a 50 mile two way range...meaning 100 miles.

IMHO, the Shallow Water Combat Submersible (SWCS) program
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
is the answer. It is the replacement for the failed Advanced Seal Delivery System (ASDS) which tried to use a very un-stealthy rectangular shaped pressure hull, with problem prone batteries and a noisy propulsion system. This one is a different and IMHO better design.

Teledyne is operating on a $400 million dollar contract to develop it and has been working on it for over three years now. But, as you might expect, specifics are very compartmentalized and very classified.


swcs.jpg

Concept Art of Teledyne's new SWCS

As we have learned, the US Navy is now considering a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which is already operating commercially, and would need to be refitted for military use.


s301_1.jpg

S301 COTS SWCV alternative

I have always wondered why the US Navy does not simply modify its Deep Submergence Rescue Vehicle to do the job. I know it's hull is meant for deep sea diving (operational to 2000 ft, max 5000 ft) but it seems they could create a less strong pressure hull with the same innards, because there is good room in these vessels...enough for 24 people.


640px-DSRV-Mystic.jpg

US Navy DSRV on a LA Class nuclear attack submarine

And they can be carried on C-5s


640px-DSRV_2_Avalon_1.jpg

US Navy DSRV being loaded on a C-5 Galaxy aircraft
 
Last edited:
Top